Cited by 15Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Effect of 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Auditory Cortex on Audiometry and Otoacustic Emissions

Schönfeldt-Lecuona, C., Cárdenas-Morales, L., Moreno-Aguirre, A., Dorn, K., Langguth, B., Brühl, A. B., Kammer, T., Herwig, U.·2012·Brain Topography

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at low frequencies (≤1 Hz) delivered to the primary motor cortex for 15 min or longer has been shown to reduce motor cortex excitability. Over the visual cortex, 1 Hz rTMS led to increased phosphene thresholds and over the auditory cortex rTMS reduced auditory evoked potentials. rTMS above the auditory or temporo-parietal cortex has also been reported to reduce the severity of auditory hallucinations and the perception of tinnitus. However, possible unwanted effects on hearing function have not yet been investigated systematically. 12 right-handed normal hearing subjects (5 male, mean age 28.2 ± 4.3) received a single session of 18 min 1 Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold intensity using an established coil positioning method targeting the Heschl's area of the left superior temporal gyrus. Standard pure tone audiometry and distortion-products otoacustic emissions (DPOAE) were performed before and immediately after stimulation. The main finding was that one session of 1 Hz rTMS over the temporal cortex modified neither the auditory threshold meaningfully nor the presence of DPOAE in healthy subjects. In conclusion, we found in this pilot approach no obvious indication for auditory dysfunctions due to direct electromagnetic stimulation of the superior temporal gyrus after one session of rTMS in healthy controls that may be interpreted as unwanted side effects. Nevertheless monitoring of auditory functions is strongly recommended in future clinical trials stimulating the auditory cortex, as this has not been done systematically in the past.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10548-012-0218-1

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schönfeldt-Lecuona, C., Cárdenas-Morales, L., Moreno-Aguirre, A., Dorn, K., Langguth, B., Brühl, A. B., Kammer, T., & Herwig, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
2012-01-19
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
241-247
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W2043794126
Cited by
15
References
55
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, 1 Hz rTMS, auditory cortex, superior temporal gyrus, pure tone audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory function, hearing threshold, auditory evoked potentials, auditory hallucinations, tinnitus
MeSH terms
Adult, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Threshold, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review