Cited by 344Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Structural Brain Alterations following 5 Days of Intervention: Dynamic Aspects of Neuroplasticity

May, A, Hajak, G, Gänßbauer, S, Steffens, T, Langguth, B, Kleinjung, T, Eichhammer, P·2007·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Activation-dependent brain plasticity in humans on a structural level has been demonstrated in adults after 3 months of training a visio-motor skill. The exact timescale of usage-dependent structural changes, whether days, months, or years, is, however, still debated. A better understanding of the temporal parameters may help elucidate to what extent this type of cortical plasticity contributes to fast adapting cortical processes that may be relevant to learning and effects of treatments. Using voxel-based morphometry, we are able to show that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the superior temporal cortex causes macroscopic cortical changes in gray matter (GM) in the auditory cortex as early as within 5 days of continuous intervention. These structural alterations are mirrored by changes in cortical evoked potentials attributed to the GM changes and demonstrate the rapid dynamics of these processes, which occur within a time range characteristic for the onset of behavioral effects induced by a variety of treatment methods for neuropsychiatric diseases. Our finding suggests that cortical plasticity on a structural level in adult humans is already detectable after 1 week, which provides support for fast adjusting neuronal systems, such as spine and synapse turnover, and contradicts slow evolving mechanisms, such as neuronal or glial cell genesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhj138

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that short-term interventions of 1-3 months can elicit significant changes in brain structure and function, including alterations in grey matter volume, functional connectivity, and activation patterns in regions associated with cognitive functions.

    “Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that even short-term interventions of 1–3 months can elicit significant changes in brain structure and function, including alterations in grey matter volume, functional connectivity and activation patterns in regions associated with cognitive functions.4245”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, A., Hajak, G., Gänßbauer, S., Steffens, T., Langguth, B., Kleinjung, T., & Eichhammer, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2006-02-15
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
205-210
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2118408136
Cited by
344
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
structural neuroplasticity, transcranial magnetic stimulation, superior temporal cortex, gray matter changes, auditory cortex, cortical evoked potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review