Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society

Lämsä, Anna-Maija, Vehkaperä, Meri, Puttonen, Tuomas, Pesonen, Hanna-Leena·2008·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Alvesson M. and Y. D. Billing: 1997, Understanding Gender and Organizations (Sage, London)
  2. Aspen Institute: 2001, Where Will They Lead? MBA Students’ Attitudes About Business and Society. (Aspen Institute for Social Innovation Through Business, New York)
  3. Baetz M. C. and D. J. Sharp: 2004, Integrating Ethics Content into the Core of Business Curriculum: Do Core Teaching Materials Do the Job?, Journal of Business Ethics 51, 53–63 · doi:10.1023/b:busi.0000032343.68115.dd
  4. Berger P. L. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The Social Construction of Reality. (Doubleday, New York)
  5. Borkowski S. C. and Y. J. Ugras: 1998, Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1117–1127 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons 34, 39–48 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Carroll, A. B.: 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business & Society 38(3), 268–295 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carroll, A. B. and A. K. Buchholtz: 2000, Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 4th Edition. (South-Western College Publishing)
  9. Chodorow, N.: 1978, The Reproduction of Mothering (University of California Press, Berkeley) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Derry, R.: 1989, An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 855–862 · DOI
  11. Deshpande S. P., J. Joseph and V. V. Maximow: 2000, Perceptions of Proper Ethical Conduct of Male and Female Russian Managers, Journal of Business Ethics 24(2), 179–183 · DOI
  12. Donaldson, T.: 1999, Are Business Managers “Professionals”, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1), 83–94 · DOI
  13. Ekin, M. G. S. (Atakan) and S. H. Tezölmez: 1999, ‹Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender’, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 17–34 · DOI
  14. Elias, R. F.: 2004, An Examination of Business Students’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibilities Before and After Bankruptcies, Journal of Business Ethics 52, 267–281 · DOI
  15. Ergeneli A. and S. Arikan: 2002, Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey, Journal of Business Ethics 40, 247–260 · doi:10.1023/a:1020550916408
  16. Fishbein M. and I. Ajzen: 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
  17. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston)
  18. Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
  19. Gini, A.: 1998, Women in the Workplace, Business and Society Review 99, 3–17 · doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00002
  20. Ghoshal, S.: 2005, Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practises, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), 75–91 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gomez-Mejia, L. R.: 1983, Sex differences during occupational socialization, Academy of Management Journal 26(3), 492–499 · DOI
  22. Hall, D. T.: 1987, Careers and Socialization, Journal of Management 13(2), 301–321 · DOI
  23. Joyner B. E. and D. Payne: 2002, Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics 41, 297–312 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kashyap R., R. Mir and E. Iyer: 2006, Toward Responsive Pedagogy: Linking Social Responsibility to Firm Performance Issues in the Calssroom, Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(3), 366–376 · DOI
  25. Kollmuss A. and J. Agyeman: 2002, Mind the Gap: Why do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?, Environmental Education Research 8(3), 239–260 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lämsä A-M. and T. Sintonen: 2001, A Discursive Approach to Understanding Women Leaders in Working Life, Journal of Business Ethics 34, 255–267 · DOI
  27. Lämsä A-M., A. Säkkinen and P. Turjanmaa: 2000, Values and Their Change During Business Education, International Journal of Value-Based Management 13(3), 203–213 · doi:10.1023/a:1007884005732
  28. Lämsä A-M., P. Turjanmaa and A. Säkkinen: 2003, The Values of Business Education and Working Life From a Gender Viewpoint, in Samuel M. Natale, Anthony F. Libertella (eds.), Business Education and Training: A Value Laden Process. Instructed by Reason (University Press of America, Lanham), pp. 91–102
  29. Lopez Y. P., P. L. Rechner and J. B. Olson-Buchanan: 2005, Shaping Ethical Perceptions: An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Business Education, Culture, and Demographic Factors, Journal of Business Ethics 60, 341–358 · DOI
  30. Luthar H. K. and R. Karri: 2005, Exposure to Ethics Education and the Perception of Linkage Between Organizational Ethical Behavior and Business Outcomes, Journal of Business Ethics 61, 353–368 · DOI
  31. MacLellan C. and J. Dobson: 1997, Women, ethics, and MBAs, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1201–1209 · DOI
  32. Mainieri T., E. G. Barnett, T .R. Valdero, J. B. Unipan and S. Oskamp: 1997, Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behaviour, The Journal of Social Psychology 137(2), 189–204 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mason E. S. and Mudrack, P. E.: 1996, Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 599–604 · DOI · Paper page
  34. McPhail, K.: 2001, The Other Objective of Ethics Education: Re-humanising the Accounting Profession – A Study of Ethics Education in Law, Engineering, Medicine and Accountancy, Journal of Business Ethics 34, 279–298 · DOI
  35. Mikkola, T.: 1997, Arvot ja ympäristö. Uuden keskiluokan ympäristöarvot ja -asenteet maailmankuvallisen muutoksen heijastajina in H. Helve (ed.), Arvot, maailmankuvat ja sukupuoli, (Helsinki, Yliopistopaino), pp. 95–139
  36. Näsi, J. (ed.): 1995, Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (LSR-Publications, Helsinki)
  37. Osgood C., G. Suci and P. Tannenbaum: 1957, The Measurement of Meaning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana)
  38. Paine, L. S.: 1997, Cases in Leadership, Ethics, and Organizational Integrity. A Strategic Perspective (Irwin, Chigago)
  39. Pfeffer, J.: 2005, Why Do Bad Management Theories Persit? A Comment on Ghoshal, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), 96–100 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Powell G. N. and L. Graves: 2003, Women and Men in Management (Sage, Thousand Oaks)
  41. Ritter, B. A.: 2006, Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students, Journal of Business Ethics 68, 153–164 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ruegger D. and E. W. King: 1992, A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender Upon Student Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179–186 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Sims R. R. and J. Brinkmann: 2003, Business Ethics Curriculum Design: Suggestions and Illustrations, Teaching Business Ethics 7, 69–86 · doi:10.1023/a:1022602521549
  44. Statistics Finland: 2002, Suomalaiset ja ympäristö (Tilastokeskus, Helsinki)
  45. Statistics Finland: 2006, Naiset ja miehet Suomessa (Tilastokeskus, Helsinki)
  46. Suhonen, P.: 1994, Suomalaisten arvot ja politiikka (WSOY, Helsinki)
  47. Uliczka H., P. Angelstam, G. Jansson and A. Bro: 2004, Non-industrial Private Forest Owners’ Knowledge of and Attitude Towards Nature Conservation, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19(3), 274–288 · doi:10.1080/02827580410029318
  48. Vagg P. R., C. D. Spielberger and C. F. Wasala: 2002, Effects of Organizational Level and Gender on Stress in the Workplace, International Journal of Stress Management 9(4), 243–261 · doi:10.1023/a:1019964331348
  49. Vanhala, S.: 2003, Johtajuus yksityisissä yrityksissä: Naiset etenevät hitaasti uraputkessa, Hyvinvointikatsaus 4, 31–37
  50. Wehrmeyer W. and M. McNeil: 2000, Activists, Pragmatists, Technophiles and Tree-Huggers? Gender Differences in Employees’ Environmental Attitudes, Journal of Business Ethics 28, 211–222 · doi:10.1023/a:1006253212744
  51. Witt, H. E.: 1993, Essential Tensions – Phase Two: Feminist, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Science. A Mind of One’s Own Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity (Westriew Press, Boulder)

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Lämsä, A.-M., Vehkaperä, M., Puttonen, T., & Pesonen, H.-L.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-09-11
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
45-58
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7
OpenAlex
W2114854380
Cited by
207
References
4
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7
The paper
Lämsä, A.-M., Vehkaperä, M., Puttonen, T., & Pesonen, H.-L. (2008). Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.