Cited by 202Environmental Sustainability in BusinessMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The Effect of Misleading Environmental Claims on Consumer Perceptions of Advertisements

Newell, Stephen J., Goldsmith, Ronald E., Banzhaf, Edgar J.·1998·Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice

Abstract

This study investigates whether consumers who are exposed to an ad containing a deceptive environmental claim have significantly different attitudes about the ad than those consumers exposed to a similar non-deceptive ad. As hypothesized, higher levels of perceived deception were associated with lower levels of perceived corporate credibility, less favorable attitudes toward the ad, less favorable attitudes toward the advertised brand, and decreased purchase intentions toward the product in the ad. In addition, the study found that the perception of deception was enough to create negative feelings toward the ad, whether the ad was objectively misleading or not. Consequently, marketing and advertising managers need to proceed with caution when developing environmentally focused ad campaigns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10696679.1998.11501795

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newell, S. J., Goldsmith, R. E., & Banzhaf, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
Published
1998-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
48-60
ISSN
  • 1069-6679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7175
OpenAlex
W2252707738
Cited by
202
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
misleading environmental claims, misleading advertising, perceived deception, institutional credibility, consumer attitudes toward advertising, brand attitude, purchase intention, green advertising, environmental claims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review