Cited by 357Workplace Spirituality and LeadershipLeadership and Management in OrganizationsEthics in Business and Education

Compassionate Love as a Cornerstone of Servant Leadership: An Integration of Previous Theorizing and Research

van Dierendonck, Dirk, Patterson, Kathleen·2015·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-014-2085-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K.
Affiliations
Regent University (US)
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2014-02-13
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
119-131
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W1995329261
Cited by
357
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
34.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
servant leadership, compassionate love, Greenleaf, virtue, humility, gratitude, forgiveness, altruism, empowerment, authenticity, stewardship, leadership behavior, organizational community

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review