Cited by 20Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Leadership beyond Narcissism: On the Role of Compassionate Love as Individual Antecedent of Servant Leadership

Open access
Brouns, Tim, Externbrink, Kai, Blesa Aledo, Pablo Salvador·2020·Administrative Sciences

Abstract

While we already know a lot about the outcomes and boundary conditions of servant leadership, there is still a need for research on its antecedents. Building on the theory of purposeful work behavior and further theorizing by van Dierendonck and Patterson (2015), we examine if leaders’ propensity for compassionate love will evoke servant leadership behavior. At the same time, we contrast compassionate love to leaders’ narcissism as psychological counterpart to compassionate love, because narcissism is not associated with leader effectiveness, but with leader emergence instead. We collected data from 170 leader-follower-dyads in a field study in Germany, while measuring leaders’ compassionate love and narcissism, and followers’ perceptions of servant leadership. We found a positive association between leaders’ compassionate love and servant leadership behavior, while narcissism was negatively associated with servant leadership. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as pathways for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/admsci10020020

Cites

36 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leader's narcissism is negatively associated with servant leadership behaviour.

    “Narcissism was negatively associated with servant leadership”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Brouns et al. (2020)

  • Compassionate love is positively associated with servant leadership.

    “Compassionate love is positively associated with servant leadership”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Brouns et al. (2020)

  • Leaders' self-assessment of compassionate love is positively correlated with servant leadership behaviour as perceived by employees.

    “Leaders’ self-assessment of compassionate love was positively co-related with the servant leadership behaviour as perceived by the employees”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Brouns et al. (2020)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Brislin, Richard W. 1970. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185-216.
  2. Campbell, W. Keith, Eric A. Rudich, and Constantine Sedikides. 2002. Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Positivity of Self-Views: Two Portraits of Self-Love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 358-68.
  3. Conway, James M., and Charles E. Lance. 2010. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research. Journal of Business and Psychology 25: 325-34.
  4. Eva, Nathan, Mulyadi Robin, Sen Sendjaya, Dirk van Dierendonck, and Robert C. Liden. 2019. Servant Leadership: A Systematic Review and Call for Future Research. The Leadership Quarterly 30: 111-32.
  5. Externbrink, Kai, and Christian Dormann. 2015. Führen Und Entscheiden: Evidence-Based Management. In Trends Der Psychologischen Führungsforschung. Edited by Jörg Felfe. Göttingen: Hogrefe, pp. 429-39.
  6. Externbrink, Kai, and Moritz Keil. 2018. Narzissmus, Machiavellismus Und Psychopathie in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  7. Flynn, C. Brian, James W. Smither, and Alan G. Walker. 2016. Exploring the Relationship Between Leaders' Core Self-Evaluations and Subordinates' Perceptions of Servant Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 23: 260-71.
  8. Greenleaf, Robert K. 1977. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
  9. Grijalva, Emily, Peter D. Harms, Daniel A. Newman, Blaine H. Gaddis, and R. Chris Fraley. 2015. Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships. Personnel Psychology 68: 1-47.
  10. Haidt, Jonathan. 2003. The Moral Emotions. In Series in Affective Science. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Edited by R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer and H. H. Goldsmith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 852-70.
  11. Higgs, Malcolm. 2009. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Leadership and Narcissism. Journal of Change Management 9: 165-78.
  12. Hoch, Julia E., William H. Bommer, James H. Dulebohn, and Dongyuan Wu. 2018. Do Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership Explain Variance Above and Beyond Transformational Leadership? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management 44: 501-29.
  13. Hu, Li-tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6: 1-55.
  14. Hunter, Emily M., Mitchell J. Neubert, Sara Jansen Perry, L. A. Witt, Lisa M. Penney, and Evan Weinberger. 2013. Servant Leaders Inspire Servant Followers: Antecedents and Outcomes for Employees and the Organization. Leadership Quarterly 24: 316-31.
  15. Lee, Angela, and Nichelle C. Carpenter. 2018. Seeing Eye to Eye: A Meta-Analysis of Self-Other Agreement of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 29: 253-75.
  16. Liden, Robert C., Sandy J. Wayne, Hao Zhao, and David Henderson. 2008. Servant Leadership: Development of a Multidimensional Measure and Multi-Level Assessment. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 161-77.
  17. Podsakoff, Philip M., and Dennis W. Organ. 1986. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management 12: 531-44.
  18. Rosseel, Yves. 2012. Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48: 1-36.
  19. Sendjaya, Sen, James C. Sarros, and Joseph C. Santora. 2008. Defining and Measuring Servant Leadership Behaviour in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies 45: 402-24.
  20. Sprecher, Susan, and Beverley Fehr. 2005. Compassionate Love for Close Others and Humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22: 629-51.
  21. Van Dierendonck, Dirk, and Inge Nuijten. 2011. The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. Journal of Business and Psychology 26: 249-67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouns, T., Externbrink, K., & Blesa Aledo, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
  • FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management (DE)
  • Economía y Empresa, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain
Corresponding author
Brouns, Tim
Venue
Administrative Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-26
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
20
ISSN
2076-3387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013925275
Cited by
20
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administrative Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RIUCAM (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
servant leadership, compassionate love, narcissism, leadership emergence, leader-follower dyads

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review