CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Management Theory and PracticeManagement and Organizational StudiesGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’

Greenwood, Michelle, Van Buren, Harry J.·2017·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z

Cites

109 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 116 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fox, A. (1966). Industrial sociology and industrial relations. London: HMSO.
  2. Friedman, M. (1962/1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of Ameruican business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
  5. Walton, R. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, March–April, pp. 76–84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Related

Metadata

Authors
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
ORCID
Greenwood, Michelle
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-03-07
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
663-678
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z
OpenAlex
W2293092496
Cited by
66
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
employment relationship, validity claims, epistemic analysis, workplace power, employee interests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review