Cited by 27Fatty Acid Research and HealthAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Association between omega-3 fatty acid treatment and atrial fibrillation in cardiovascular outcome trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jia, Xiaoming, Gao, Feng, Pickett, June K., Al Rifai, Mahmoud, Birnbaum, Yochai, Nambi, Vijay, Virani, Salim S., Ballantyne, Christie M.·2021·Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Abstract

Purpose Data on the relationship between omega-3 fatty acid (n-3 FA) therapy with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been inconsistent. We investigate the association between n-3 FA and risk for AF by pooling data from available large, cardiovascular outcome trials. Methods We performed a systematic search on PubMed and Embase for studies on n-3 FA with AF as an outcome measure. Large (≥ 1000 participants) randomized controlled trials with ≥ 1-year follow-up period were included. The association between n-3 FA and risk of AF or stroke was assessed. Mantel-Haenszel random effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We then performed meta-regression to evaluate effect on AF by dose of n-3 FA therapy. Results A total of 8 randomized control trials encompassing 83,112 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, five trials assessed a lower dose of n-3 FA (≤ 1 g daily, n = 61,096) while 3 trials assessed a higher dose (> 1 g daily, n = 22,016). In meta-analysis, a significant association was noted between n-3 FA treatment and risk of AF (4.0% vs 3.3%; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.38, p = 0.0002). There was a modest but still significant association in the lower dose (n-3 FA ≤ 1 g daily) sub-group (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21, p = 0.004) and stronger association in the higher dose (n-3 FA > 1 g daily) sub-group (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.26-1.80, p Conclusion While overall AF event rates were low, n-3 FA treatment is associated with increased…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10557-021-07204-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jia, X., Gao, F., Pickett, J. K., Al Rifai, M., Birnbaum, Y., Nambi, V., Virani, S. S., & Ballantyne, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jia, Xiaoming
Venue
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
793-800
ISSN
  • 0920-3206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7241
OpenAlex
W3165493665
Cited by
27
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, dose-response relationship, cardiovascular outcome trials, omega-3 supplementation, cardiovascular risk factors, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, triglyceride metabolism, endothelial dysfunction, blood pressure, coagulation
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Drug Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Dietary Supplements, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review