Cited by 26Fatty Acid Research and HealthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements on Arrhythmias

Parish, Sarah, Mafham, Marion, Offer, Alison, Barton, Jill, Wallendszus, Karl, Stevens, William, Buck, Georgina, Haynes, Richard +4 more·2020·Circulation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044165

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methodological concerns have been raised regarding prior interventional analyses, including inconsistent reporting of AF outcomes, potential informative censoring due to longer survival in omega-3 treated groups compared to placebo groups, and/or discrepancies in AF case ascertainment.

    “methodological concerns have been raised regarding prior interventional analyses including inconsistent reporting of AF outcomes, potential informative censoring due to longer survival in omega-3 treated groups compared to placebo groups5, and/or discrepancies in AF case ascertainment6.”

    From Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Treatment on Risk for Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 35 Trials including 114 592 Individuals (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The results section (pp. 331–333; exact page unavailable in our copy) reports fewer cardiac deaths in the omega-3 group than in the placebo group (1.7% versus 2.2%). That supports a mortality difference, but the paper does not establish longer overall survival or raise informative censoring as a concern for AF analyses. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parish, S., Mafham, M., Offer, A., Barton, J., Wallendszus, K., Stevens, W., Buck, G., Haynes, R., Collins, R., Bowman, L., Armitage, J., & On behalf of the ASCEND Study Collaborative Group
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2020-01-28
Volume
141
Issue
4
Pages
331-333
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2994308405
Cited by
26
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • British Heart Foundation (SP/08/010/25939, CH/1996001/9454, SP/14/3/31114, PG/05/013/18296, SP/03/002)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00017/5)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, dietary supplements, cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic effect, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Female, Humans, Male, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review