Cited by 233Fatty Acid Research and HealthLipid metabolism and disordersLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Omega-3 free fatty acids for the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia: The EpanoVa fOr Lowering Very high triglyceridEs (EVOLVE) trial

Open access
Kastelein, John J.P., Maki, Kevin C., Susekov, Andrey, Ezhov, Marat, Nordestgaard, Borge G., Machielse, Ben N., Kling, Douglas, Davidson, Michael H.·2014·Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Abstract

Background Omega-3 fatty acids in free fatty acid form have enhanced bioavailability, and plasma levels are less influenced by food than for ethyl ester forms.Objective The aim was to evaluate the safety and lipid-altering efficacy in subjects with severe hypertriglyceridemia of an investigational pharmaceutical omega-3 free fatty acid (OM3-FFA) containing eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid.Methods This was a multinational, double-blind, randomized, out-patient study. Men and women with triglycerides (TGs) ≥ 500 mg/dL, but <2000 mg/dL, took control (olive oil [OO] 4 g/d; n = 99), OM3-FFA 2 g/d (plus OO 2 g/d; n = 100), OM3-FFA 3 g/d (plus OO 1 g/d; n = 101), or OM3-FFA 4 g/d (n = 99) capsules for 12 weeks in combination with the National Cholesterol Education Program Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes diet.Results Fasting serum TGs changed from baseline by -25.9% (P < .01 vs OO), -25.5% (P < .01 vs OO), and -30.9% (P < .001 vs OO) with 2, 3, and 4 g/d OM3-FFA, respectively, compared with -4.3% with OO. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, remnant-like particle cholesterol, apolipoprotein CIII, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and arachidonic acid were significantly lowered (P < .05 at each OM3-FFA dosage vs OO); and plasma eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid were significantly elevated (P < .001 at each OM3-FFA dosage vs OO). With OM3-FFA 2 and 4 g/d (but not 3 g/d), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased compared with OO (P < .05 vs OO). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein responses with OM3-FFA did not differ significantly from the OO response at any dosage. Fewer subjects reported any adverse event with OO vs OM3-FFA, but frequencies across dosage groups were similar. Discontinuation due to adverse event, primarily gastrointestinal, ranged from 5% to 7% across OM3-FFA dosage groups vs 0% for OO.Conclusions OM3-FFA achieved the primary end point for TG lowering and secondary end point of non-HDL-C lowering at 2, 3, and 4 g/d in persons with severe hypertriglyceridemia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01242527.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.10.003

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Discussion

    The regression-predicted triglyceride reductions of 32.8% and 38.4% were similar to the observed least-squares geometric mean reductions of 30.9% and 44.3%.

    “These values are similar to the observed LSGM reductions of 30.9% and 44.3%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    OM3-FFA at 2, 3, and 4 g/d significantly reduced VLDL-C compared with olive oil.

    “Non-HDL-C, total-Cto-HDL-C ratio, VLDL-C, RLP-C, and Apo CIII concentrations were also significantly reduced in each OM3-FFA treatment group compared with responses in the OO group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Plasma DHA and EPA increased significantly in all OM3-FFA groups compared with olive oil.

    “plasma DHA and EPA concentrations increased significantly, and AA concentrations were reduced significantly in all OM3-FFA treatment groups compared with the OO group (all P , .001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Apo AI increased more with olive oil than with OM3-FFA 2 or 4 g/d.

    “Apo AI concentration was increased in the OO group compared with responses to the 2 and 4 g/d OM3-FFA groups (P ,.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Total-C was significantly reduced versus olive oil in the 2 and 4 g/d OM3-FFA groups.

    “Total-C was reduced in all OM3-FFA treatment groups.Comparisons of the 2-and 4-g/d treatment groups vs OO showed statistical significance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Lp-PLA2 was significantly lowered in all OM3-FFA groups, by about 11% to 17%, compared with about 2% with olive oil.

    “Lp-PLA 2 , an enzyme that participates in inflammation and that has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease risk, 6,[52][53][54] was significantly lowered in all OM3-FFA treatment groups (changes from 211% to 217%) compared with the OO control group (22%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    LDL-C was significantly increased versus olive oil in the 2 and 4 g/d OM3-FFA groups, with about 19% increases versus 3% for olive oil.

    “LDL-C was significantly increased, compared with OO, in the 2-g/d and 4-g/d OM3-FFA groups (3% for OO vs 19% for both 2 g/d [P , .01] and 4 g/d [P , .001]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Lp-PLA2 declined significantly versus olive oil in every OM3-FFA group, with reductions of about 11% to 17%.

    “Lp-PLA 2 declined significantly vs OO in each OM3-FFA treatment group (P , .01);changes in the OM3-FFA groups ranged from 211% to 217%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Adverse events leading to study discontinuation occurred at similar overall rates across omega-3 free fatty acid doses (5% to 7%) and at 0% with olive oil.

    “The overall frequencies of AEs, inclusive of all types of events, leading to study discontinuation were similar across OM3-FFA dosages (5% to 7%) vs 0% for OO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Omega-3 free fatty acids were safe and generally well tolerated.

    “OM3-FFA was safe and generally well tolerated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Arachidonic acid fell by 15.1%, 16.0%, and 23.2% with 2, 3, and 4 g/d omega-3 free fatty acids, respectively, while it rose by 2.2% with olive oil.

    “AA was reduced by 15.1%, 16.0%, and 23.2%, respectively, with the 2-, 3-, and 4-g/d dosages of OM3-FFA, compared with a 2.2% increase with OO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The randomized subjects were predominantly white (92%) and men (77%), with mean age 51.5 years and BMI 31.2 kg/m2.

    “The subjects were predominantly white (92%) and men (77%) with an average age of 51.5 years and body mass index of 31.2 kg/m 2 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Any adverse event was reported by 26% of the olive oil group, a lower proportion than in the omega-3 free fatty acid groups.

    “Fewer subjects reported any AE with OO (26%) than with OM3-FFA”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistical analyses

    Efficacy comparisons used analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates and a stratification factor for users and nonusers of permitted lipid-altering drugs.

    “Efficacy end points for each OM3-FFA arm were compared with OO with the use of analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates and a stratification factor for users and nonusers of permitted lipid-altering drugs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    Mean compliance with study product was 97.3%, with no marked differences between groups.

    “Overall mean 6 SD compliance with study product was 97.3% 6 9.0% of expected doses, and no marked differences were observed in compliance between treatment groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistical analyses

    The targeted sample size of 332 gave at least 80% power to detect a 20% triglyceride difference versus olive oil, assuming a 35% standard deviation, two-sided alpha 0.05 with Bonferroni adjustment, and 10% attrition.

    “The targeted sample size of 332 subjects (83 per treatment arm) was expected to provide at least 80% power to detect a difference of at least 20% in TG percentage changes compared with OO, assuming a common standard deviation (SD) in percentage change of 35%, a 2-sided a 5 0.05 adjusted for 3 pairwise tests vs OO (Bonferroni method), and 10% attrition rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistical analyses

    Efficacy results are reported from the modified intent-to-treat sample because per-protocol results did not differ materially.

    “Only the results from the modified intent-to-treat sample are described herein because those from the per protocol sample did not differ materially.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Statistical analyses

    The sample size also gave 80% power to detect about 10% differences from olive oil in non-HDL-C and HDL-C, assuming a 17% standard deviation.

    “This sample size was also expected to provide 80% power to detect approximately 10% differences from OO in percentage changes of non-HDL-C and HDL-C, assuming a common SD of 17% in each variable”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Apo B is more predictive of coronary heart disease risk than LDL-C.

    “Apo B has also been shown to be more predictive of risk of coronary heart disease than LDL-C.39”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Sondermeijer, 2013, Non-HDL cholesterol vs. Apo B for risk of coronary heart disease in healthy individuals: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study, Eur J Clin Invest source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Study design

    The trial was double-blind, randomized, parallel, four-arm, with eight clinic visits at 74 sites.

    “This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel, 4-arm study with 8 clinic visits conducted at 74 clinical sites”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    In severe hypertriglyceridemia, baseline LDL-C is typically below average because a larger fraction of total cholesterol is carried in VLDL particles, partly due to inefficient triglyceride hydrolysis and reduced VLDL-to-LDL conversion.

    “In severe hypertriglyceridemia the baseline LDL-C level is typically below average because a larger-than-normal fraction of total-C is carried in VLDL particles, in part because of inefficient TG hydrolysis and reduced rate of conversion of VLDL to LDL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31][32][33]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Study design

    Randomization was stratified to balance treatment groups for use of allowed lipid-altering medications.

    “A stratified randomization scheme was used to ensure that treatment groups were balanced for the use of other allowed lipid-altering medications”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Apo CIII inhibits lipoprotein lipase, slowing triglyceride hydrolysis, and interferes with hepatic Apo B/E receptor interactions, slowing removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.

    “Apo CIII appears to play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertriglyceridemia, particularly for inhibiting the action of lipoprotein lipase, thus slowing TG hydrolysis.47 Apo CIII also interferes with the interactions of TG-rich lipoproteins with hepatic Apo B/E receptors, slowing the removal of these particles from the circulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Kawakami, 2009, Apolipoprotein CIII links dyslipidemia with atherosclerosis, J Atheroscler Thromb source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    The LDL-C increase with OM3-FFA was not accompanied by a significant Apo B increase, and non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, and RLP-C were reduced, so the LDL-C increase was not associated with more circulating atherogenic lipoprotein particles.

    “Thus, the increase in LDL-C with OM3-FFA was not associated with an increase in the circulating concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    Of 399 randomly assigned subjects, 364 completed, with no significant difference in discontinuation among groups.

    “Of the 399 persons randomly assigned to treatment, 364 completed the study.No significant differences were found among treatment groups in the number who discontinued (P 5 .146).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Statistical analyses

    Normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and if rejected, data were rank-transformed before analysis.

    “Normality assumptions were investigated with the Shapiro-Wilk test on the residuals.If the normality assumption was rejected (P , .01),data for that variable were ranked before the final analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    The 4 g/d OM3-FFA triglyceride results in the overall sample and in subjects with baseline triglycerides above 885 mg/dL were close to predictions from a regression of 16 published trials of 4 g/d OM3 products.

    “are close to the line of best fit determined from an unweighted regression analysis of the relationship between mean or median baseline TGs and TG response to 4 g/d of pharmaceutical OM3 products”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10][11][12]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Study design

    The study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki, and US regulations; the protocol and consent were approved by ethics committees; and informed consent was obtained.

    “This study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki (2000), and the United States 21 Code of Federal Regulations.The study protocol and informed consent documents were approved by the local responsible institutional review boards/independent ethics committees in North America, Europe, and India before the study was initiated.A signed informed cons”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Omega-3 fatty acid treatment lowers triglycerides by reducing hepatic triglyceride secretion and enhancing triglyceride clearance from circulation.

    “OM3 fatty acid treatment lowers the TG level by both reducing the amount of hepatic TG secretion and by enhancing the rate of TG clearance from circulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 17,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Lp-PLA2 participates in inflammation and is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease risk.

    “Lp-PLA 2 , an enzyme that participates in inflammation and that has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease risk, 6,[52][53][54]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 6,[52][53][54]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Laboratory and safety assessments

    Investigators were blinded to triglyceride results unless values exceeded 2000 mg/dL.

    “Investigators were blinded to the TG results, unless the values were .2000mg/dL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Discussion

    The smaller triglyceride reduction in the 3 g/d group than in the 2 or 4 g/d groups could be explained by random variation.

    “It is notable that the degree of TG reduction was smaller in the 3-g/d group than in the 2-or 4-g/d treatment groups.However, random variation cannot be excluded as an explanation for this unexpected pattern”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.
    • Rests on an assumption: Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    The placebo-corrected hs-CRP decrease seen with EPA ethyl ester may be explained by a non-neutral mineral oil control, because the differences arose from rises in control groups rather than falls from baseline with EPA ethyl ester.

    “a potential explanation for that effect could be a non-neutral effect of the mineral oil control on hs-CRP levels, because the significant differences in hs-CRP responses were attributable to increases in the control groups of these trials and not to reductions from baseline with EPA-EE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    In earlier omega-3 free fatty acid studies, gastrointestinal disturbance was common, prompting development of a coated capsule that prevents free fatty acid release in the stomach.

    “In past studies with OM3-FFA, the incidence of gastrointestinal disturbance was high, which led to the development of a capsule with a coating to prevent the release of the free fatty acids into the stomach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Davidson, 2012, A novel omega-3 free fatty acid formulation has dramatically improved bioavailability during a low-fat diet compared with omega-3-acid ethyl esters: The ECLIPSE (Epanova® compared to Lovaza® in a pharmacokinetic single-dose evaluation) study, J Clin Lipidol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Arachidonic acid is associated with greater platelet aggregation and with production of prostaglandins and leukotrienes that increase platelet activation and vasoconstriction.

    “which is linked to increased platelet aggregation and production of prostaglandins and leukotrienes that enhance platelet activation and vasoconstriction.59”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] DeCaterina, 1990, Vascular prostacyclins is increased in patients ingesting omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids before coronary artery bypass graft surgery, Circulation source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Investigators have described ethnicity as a possible source of inconsistent findings in studies of omega-3 fatty acid intake and cardiovascular outcomes.

    “Ethnicity has been described as a factor that may contribute to inconsistencies in results from studies of the effects of OM3 fatty acid consumption on cardiovascular disease outcomes.60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] Patel, 2010, Omega-3 polyunsaturated acids and cardiovascular disease: notable ethnic differences of unfulfilled promise?, J Thromb Haemost source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Earlier studies of omega-3 ethyl esters found lower lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2.

    “Previous studies with OM3-EEs have also shown reduced Lp-PLA 2 ,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] Davidson, 2009, Effects of prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters on lipoprotein particle concentrations, apolipoproteins AI and CIII, and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass in statin-treated subjects with hypertriglyceridemia, J Clin Lipidol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] Maki, 2011, Effects of prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters, coadministered with atorvastatin, on circulating levels of lipoprotein particles, apolipoprotein CIII and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass in men and women with mixed dyslipidemia, J Clin Lipidol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Recent EPA ethyl ester studies reported a placebo-corrected decrease in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

    “Although recent investigations of EPA-EE have reported a placebo-corrected reduction on hs-CRP, 23,26,55”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Ballantyne, 2012, Efficacy and safety of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in statin-treated patients with persistent high triglycerides (from the ANCHOR study), Am J Cardiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Bays, 2011, Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in patients with very high triglyceride levels (from the Multi-center, plAcebo-controlled, Randomized, double-blInd, 12-week study with an open-label Extension [MARINE] trial), Am J Cardiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [55] Bays, 2013, Icosapent ethyl, a pure ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid: effects on circulating markers of inflammation from the MARINE and ANCHOR studies, Am J Cardiovasc Drugs source

      Not checked in the free run.

33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Olive oil 4 g/d is an inert control that does not itself meaningfully alter triglycerides or non-HDL-C, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to OM3-FFA.

    “control (olive oil [OO] 4 g/d)”
    “compared with 24.3% with OO”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Subjects adhered to the TLC diet and maintained weight during the trial, so observed lipid changes are not due to diet or weight changes.

    “Subjects were instructed to follow the National Cholesterol Education Program Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes (TLC) diet”
    “be willing to maintain their customary activity level, follow the TLC diet with weight maintenance”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The olive oil control does not itself alter the lipid or inflammatory endpoints, so differences from olive oil can be attributed to omega-3 free fatty acids.

    “hs-CRP was not reduced with OM3-FFA compared with OO.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Gastrointestinal withdrawals use the wrong denominator

    Minor

    The discussion says gastrointestinal events accounted for 3% of discontinuations. Earlier, the paper reports three gastrointestinal withdrawals in each active-treatment group-3% of subjects in each group-while total AE-related discontinuations were 5% to 7% of subjects per group. Gastrointestinal events therefore accounted for substantially more than 3% of discontinuations.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kastelein, J. J. P., Maki, K. C., Susekov, A., Ezhov, M., Nordestgaard, B. G., Machielse, B. N., Kling, D., & Davidson, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • BioFortis (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kastelein, John J.P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
94-106
ISSN
  • 1876-4789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-2874
OpenAlex
W2099767767
Cited by
233
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of clinical lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
severe hypertriglyceridemia, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, triglyceride lowering, olive oil, lipid-lowering efficacy, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein C-III, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, C-reactive protein
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Triglycerides, Hypertriglyceridemia, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review