Cited by 23Advanced Cellulose Research Studiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Optimization of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) concentration in polycaprolactone bio-composites for bio-plotting: A robust interpretation of the reinforcement mechanisms

Open access
Vidakis, Nectarios, Petousis, Markos, Michailidis, Nikolaos, David, Constantine, Mountakis, Nikolaos, Papadakis, Vassilis, Sfakiotakis, Evangelos, Sagris, Dimitrios +1 more·2024·Cellulose

Abstract

Abstract Bioabsorbable and biodegradable composites have experienced rapid growth, owing to their high demand in the biomedical sector. Polymer-cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) compounds were developed using a medical-grade poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) matrix to improve the stiffness and load-bearing capacity of pure PCL. Five PCL/CNCs filament grades were melt-extruded, pelletized, and fed into an industrial bioplotter to fabricate specimens. To assess the effects of CNCs on pure PCL, 14 tests were conducted, including rheological, thermomechanical, and in situ micro-mechanical testing, among others. The porosity and dimensional accuracy of the samples were also documented using micro-computed tomography while scanning electron microscopy was employed for morphological characterization. Overall, the 4.0 wt % CNCs loading accomplished the optimum mechanical response, with an increase in its tensile (19.1%) and flexural strength (12.6%) compared to pure PCL. Concurrently, this grade exhibited the highest MFR, minimum porosity, and highest nominal-to-actual geometric accuracy, thereby convincingly interpreting the reinforcement mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10570-024-05851-7

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vidakis, N., Petousis, M., Michailidis, N., David, C., Mountakis, N., Papadakis, V., Sfakiotakis, E., Sagris, D., & Argyros, A.
Affiliations
  • Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • International Hellenic University (GR)
  • University of West Attica (GR)
Corresponding author
Vidakis, Nectarios
Venue
Cellulose
Published
2024-03-29
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
3657-3680
ISSN
  • 0969-0239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-882X
OpenAlex
W4393310952
Cited by
23
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cellulose (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Hellenic Mediterranean University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
cellulose nanocrystals, polycaprolactone, biocomposites, reinforcement mechanism, tensile strength, flexural strength, porosity, dimensional accuracy, melt extrusion, biodegradable polymers, additive manufacturing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review