Cited by 15Advanced Cellulose Research Studiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Reactive melt crosslinking of cellulose nanocrystals/poly (ε-caprolactone) for heat-shrinkable network

Open access
Avella, Angelica, Idström, Alexander, Mincheva, Rosica, Nakayama, Koyuru, Evenäs, Lars, Raquez, Jean-Marie, Lo Re, Giada·2022·Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing

Abstract

Focusing on the challenge of non-biodegradable plastics replacement, we propose a design for peroxide-initiated crosslinking of biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and renewable cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) bionanocomposites. An industrially scalable water-assisted reactive melt-processing (REx) is studied to explore the hypothesis of synergy between simultaneous effects of water on improving CNC dispersion and boosting PCL branching/crosslinking. We demonstrate that the melt processing control enables the preparation of targeted thermoplastic/thermoset bionanocomposites with gel content up to ≈ 40 %, identified as the limit of their melt-processability. Structural characterization reveals that ≈ 70 wt% of the initial CNC content is irreversibly incorporated in a percolating network, enhancing the crosslinked bionanocomposites properties. The bionanocomposites' complex viscosity and elastic character increase with the gel content, thus improving PCL melt performance. Furthermore, the irreversible entrapment of CNCs in the 3D percolating network provides heat-shrinkability, indicating a potential of the reacted bionanocomposites for heat-triggered shape-memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107166

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Melt blending offers scalability and solvent-free processing, but achieving uniform NC dispersion in PCL remains a challenge due to the hydrophilic nature of NC and its tendency to agglomerate within the hydrophobic PCL matrix.

    “Melt blending offers the advantage of scalability and solvent-free processing, although achieving uniform NC dispersion remains a challenge due to its hydrophilic nature and tendency to agglomerate within the hydrophobic PCL matrix [21,66]”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction says CNC surface hydroxyl groups promote agglomeration and describes wet-feeding as easier to scale up; the Melt rheology section reports CNC aggregation and poor adhesion after traditional melt processing. However, the paper uses a water-assisted process rather than establishing the claimed solvent-free advantage, and it does not explicitly attribute the dispersion problem to hydrophilic CNCs in a hydrophobic PCL matrix. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treated CNCs improve interfacial adhesion and dispersion within PCL, resulting in enhanced mechanical performance compared to unmodified fillers.

    “Avella et al. [66] demonstrated that treated CNCs improved interfacial adhesion and dispersion within PCL, resulting in enhanced mechanical performance compared to unmodified fillers.”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    Section 3.5 reports better CNC dispersion in the crosslinked PCL composite than in the unreacted composite, along with stronger network reinforcement and more efficient stress transfer. It also reports increased storage modulus, but reduced deformability. The paper studies reactive crosslinking of the composite, rather than showing that separately treated CNC fillers generally improve mechanical performance over unmodified fillers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NC can enhance the thermal stability and crystallinity of PCL composites, although this effect is strongly dependent on the type of NC and its dispersion quality.

    “TGA and DSC analyses from multiple studies indicate that NC can enhance the thermal stability and crystallinity of PCL composites, although this effect is strongly dependent on the type of NC and its dispersion quality [22,66,67,68]”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    Section 3.5 (page not available) reports greater crystallinity in crosslinked PCL–CNC than in its crosslinked PCL reference, but lower overall crystallinity in the unreacted PCL–CNC composite. It also links improved CNC dispersion to delayed degradation, while the reported shift to a higher degradation temperature is for CNC, not PCL. The paper studies CNCs, not different types of nanocellulose, so it does not establish dependence on NC type. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Darwis D, Mitomo H, Enjoji T, Yoshii F, Makuuchi K. Heat resistance of radiation crosslinked poly(ε-caprolactone). J Appl Polym Sci 1998;68:581-8. Doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4628(19980425)68:4<581::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-I.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avella, A., Idström, A., Mincheva, R., Nakayama, K., Evenäs, L., Raquez, J.-M., & Lo Re, G.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • University of Mons (BE)
  • Wallenberg Wood Science Center (SE)
Venue
Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
163
Pages
107166
ISSN
1359-835X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292641161
Cited by
15
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Umeå Universitet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
cellulose nanocrystals, polycaprolactone, bionanocomposites, gel content, shape memory materials, biodegradable plastics, complex viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review