Recent advances in 3D-printed polylactide and polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications.
Open accessAbstract
The three-dimensional printing (3DP) also known as the additive manufacturing (AM), a novel and futuristic technology that facilitates the printing of multiscale, biomimetic, intricate cytoarchitecture, function-structure hierarchy, multi-cellular tissues in the complicated micro-environment, patient-specific scaffolds, and medical devices. There is an increasing demand for developing 3D-printed products that can be utilized for organ transplantations due to the organ shortage. Nowadays, the 3DP has gained considerable interest in the tissue engineering (TE) field. Polylactide (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) are exemplary biomaterials with excellent physicochemical properties and biocompatibility, which have drawn notable attraction in tissue regeneration. Herein, the recent advancements in the PLA and PCL biodegradable polymer-based composites as well as their reinforcement with hydrogels and bio-ceramics scaffolds manufactured through 3DP are systematically summarized and the applications of bone, cardiac, neural, vascularized and skin tissue regeneration are thoroughly elucidated. The interaction between implanted biodegradable polymers, in-vivo and in-vitro testing models for possible evaluation of degradation and biological properties are also illustrated. The final section of this review incorporates the current challenges and future opportunities in the 3DP of PCL- and PLA-based composites that will prove helpful for biomedical engineers to fulfill the demands of the clinical field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulties to manufacture personalized scaffolds with precise pore interconnections make it difficult to meet clinical use needs.
“difficulties to manufacture personalized scaffolds with precise pore interconnections [11,12]”
From A strategy to tailor the mechanical and degradation properties of PCL-PEG-PCL based copolymers for biomedical application (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
When applied in vivo, PCL is stable and shows no visible degradation after 6 months.
“When applied in vivo, PCL proves to be stable and shows no visible degradation after 6 months [18].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Askari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00973c · Cited by 369 · see citing works
3D printing to innovate biopolymer materials for demanding applications: A review
Li, N., Qiao, D., Zhao, S., Lin, Q., Zhang, B., & Xie, F. (2021) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100459 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
3D-poly (lactic acid) scaffolds coated with gelatin and mucic acid for bone tissue engineering
Ashwin, B., Abinaya, B., Prasith, T. P., Chandran, S. V., Yadav, L. R., Vairamani, M., Patil, S., & Selvamurugan, N. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.157 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Vidakis, N., Petousis, M., Michailidis, N., David, C., Mountakis, N., Papadakis, V., Sfakiotakis, E., Sagris, D., & Argyros, A. (2024) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-024-05851-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Saidin, S., Zubairi, S. I., Ambreen, J., Md Lazim, N. A., Sadia, M., Lim, J. T. W., Ulum, M. F., Elliyanti, A., & Sefat, F. (2026) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-026-01550-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Liu, Y.-Y., Blázquez, J. P. F., Yin, G.-Z., Wang, D.-Y., Llorca, J., & Echeverry-Rendón, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15503 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arif, Z. U., Khalid, M. Y., Noroozi, R., Sadeghianmaryan, A., Jalalvand, M., & Hossain, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Management and Technology (PK)
- University of Tehran (IR)
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Swansea University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Arif, Zia Ullah
- Khalid, Muhammad Yasir
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 218
- Pages
- 930-968
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4286792084
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- 3D printing, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, biodegradable polymers, tissue engineering scaffolds, composite hydrogels, bone regeneration, cardiac regeneration, neural tissue regeneration, skin regeneration, vascularized tissue engineering, biocompatibility, polymer degradation, patient-specific scaffolds
- MeSH terms
- Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Polyesters, Polymers, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review