Cited by 26Machine Learning and AlgorithmsTopic ModelingAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Uncertainty Estimation and Reduction of Pre-trained Models for Text Regression

Open access
Wang, Yuxia, Beck, Daniel, Baldwin, Timothy, Verspoor, Karin·2022·Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

State-of-the-art classification and regression models are often not well calibrated, and cannot reliably provide uncertainty estimates, limiting their utility in safety-critical applications such as clinical decision-making. While recent work has focused on calibration of classifiers, there is almost no work in NLP on calibration in a regression setting. In this paper, we quantify the calibration of pre- trained language models for text regression, both intrinsically and extrinsically. We further apply uncertainty estimates to augment training data in low-resource domains. Our experiments on three regression tasks in both self-training and active-learning settings show that uncertainty estimation can be used to increase overall performance and enhance model generalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/tacl_a_00483

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past work on uncertainty for LLMs has focused on simpler settings, such as classifiers and regressors, whereas the most exciting applications of LLMs relate to free-form generations.

    “Past work on uncertainty for LLMs has focused on simpler settings, such as classifiers16,17 and regressors18,19, whereas the most exciting applications of LLMs relate to free-form generations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Beck, D., Baldwin, T., & Verspoor, K.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Yuxia
  • Beck, Daniel
  • Baldwin, Timothy
  • Verspoor, Karin
Venue
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
680-696
ISSN
2307-387X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285298706
Cited by
23
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
uncertainty estimation, calibration, text regression, pre-trained language models, uncertainty reduction, self-training, active learning (machine learning), low-resource domains, data augmentation, model generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review