Cited by 58Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyMental Health Research Topics

A “triple W”-model of rumination on sadness: why am I feeling sad, what's the meaning of my sadness, and wish I could stop thinking about my sadness (but I can't!)

Raes, Filip, Hermans, Dirk, Williams, J. Mark G., Bijttebier, Patricia, Eelen, Paul·2008·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-007-9137-y

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Leuven adaptation of the Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS) is a 17-item self-report questionnaire with good psychometric properties, designed to measure ruminative responses to sadness on three subscales: Analysis, Understanding, Uncontrollability.

    “To examine rumination, the Leuven adaptation of the Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS) (Raes et al., 2008) was assessed: a 17-item self-report questionnaire with good psychometric properties, designed to measure ruminative responses to sadness on three subscales: Analysis, Understanding, Uncontrollability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., Bijttebier, P., & Eelen, P.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Raes, Filip
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
526-541
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2072366011
Cited by
58
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depressive rumination, three-factor model, causal analysis, depression maintenance, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review