Cited by 551Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression

Papageorgiou, Costas, Wells, Adrian·2003·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023962332399

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Papageorgiou, Costas
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2003-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
261-273
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2157247065
Cited by
550
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 31
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rumination, depression, metacognition, metacognitive beliefs, metacognitive model, cognitive therapy, structural equation modeling, model fit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review