CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 196Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of a Positive Psychology Intervention and a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Clinical Depression

Chaves, Covadonga, Lopez-Gomez, Irene, Hervas, Gonzalo, Vazquez, Carmelo·2017·Cognitive Therapy and Research
DOI 10.1007/s10608-016-9778-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-016-9778-9

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck anxiety inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  2. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  3. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders Research Version (SCID-I). New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute. Biometrics Research.
  4. Hervas, G., & Jodar, R. (2008). The Spanish version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Clínica y Salud, 19, 139–156.
  5. Hervas, G., & Vázquez, C. (2006). Enjoying every little thing: Orientation to daily gratifications as a mediator between extraversion and well-being. In Comunication in the III European conference on positive psychology. Braga, Portugal.
  6. Lewinsohn, P. M., Antonuccio, D. O., Breckenridge, J. S., & Teri, L. (1984). The ‘Coping with Depression’ course. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing Company.
  7. Vázquez, C. (2006). Cuestionario de pensamientos automáticos ATQ-30. In V. Caballo (Ed.), Manual para la evaluación cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos psicopatológicos. Madrid: Pirámide.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 196

Related

Metadata

Authors
Chaves, C., Lopez-Gomez, I., Hervas, G., & Vazquez, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
ORCID
Chaves, Covadonga
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-04-23
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
417-433
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
DOI
10.1007/s10608-016-9778-9
OpenAlex
W2341883060
Cited by
196
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
FWCI
42.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (PSI2012-35500, FPU12/02342)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PSI2014-56303-REDT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, group therapy, treatment efficacy comparison, well-being, positive affect, negative affect, life satisfaction, women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review