Cited by 1Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and Assessment

From diagnostic criteria to change processes: validation of the Korean process-based assessment tool using a machine learning approach

Jo, Duckhyun, Im, Sojeong, Lee, Eunbi, Sundström, Felicia, Yang, Eunjoo·2025·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-025-10693-z

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent methodological developments, such as the Process-Based Assessment Tool (PBAT), use machine learning-based variable selection to identify constructs with the strongest predictive value for mental health outcomes.

    “For example, recent methodological developments, such as the Process-Based Assessment Tool (PBAT), use machine learning-based variable selection to identify constructs with the strongest predictive value for mental health outcomes, 40,41 offering a novel approach for this purpose.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jo, D., Im, S., Lee, E., Sundström, F., & Yang, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Yang, Eunjoo
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2025-12-03
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W4416933287
Cited by
1
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Korean adaptation, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, Boruta algorithm, psychological distress, life satisfaction, frustration, culturally adapted assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review