Cited by 2,755Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth, psychology, and well-beingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality as a Dynamic Reflection of Well‐Being

Ryan, Richard M., Frederick, Christina·1997·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we examine subjective vitality, a positive feeling of aliveness and energy, in six studies. Subjective vitality is hypothesized to reflect organismic well‐being and thus should covary with both psychological and somatic factors that impact the energy available to the self. Associations are shown between subjective vitality and several indexes of psychological well‐being; somatic factors such as physical symptoms and perceived body functioning; and basic personality traits and affective dispositions. Subsequently, vitality is shown to be lower in people with chronic pain compared to matched controls, especially those who perceive their pain to be disabling or frightening. Subjective vitality is further associated with self‐motivation and maintained weight loss among patients treated for obesity. Finally, subjective vitality is assessed in a diary study for its covariation with physical symptoms. Discussion focuses on the phenomenological salience of personal energy and its relations to physical and psychological well‐being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Southern Utah University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-09
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
529-565
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2122447448
Cited by
2,755
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 189 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 216 · 2019: 166 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 132 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 90
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd019914-08, 5t32mh018922-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 18922)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-19914)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
subjective vitality, energy, well-being, psychological well-being, somatic symptoms, personality traits, affective dispositions, chronic pain, pain perception, self-motivation, obesity, weight loss, diary study
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Chronic Disease, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Obesity, Pain, Personality, Psychological Theory, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Psychophysiology, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review