Cited by 77Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Developing an item pool to assess processes of change in psychological interventions: The Process-Based Assessment Tool (PBAT)

Ciarrochi, Joseph, Sahdra, Baljinder, Hofmann, Stefan G., Hayes, Steven C.·2022·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.02.001

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ciarrochi, J., Sahdra, B., Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ciarrochi, Joseph
  • Hayes, Steven C.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
23
Pages
200-213
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211035740
Cited by
77
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
process-based therapy, change processes, item pool development, intensive longitudinal data, need satisfaction, need thwarting, psychological intervention, measurement validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review