Cited by 58Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cross-cultural flexibility: Validation of the traditional Mandarin, simplified Mandarin, and Japanese translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory

Lin, Yi-Ying, Rogge, Ronald D., Swanson, Dena Phillips·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y.-Y., Rogge, R. D., & Swanson, D. P.
Affiliations
  • College of Saint Rose (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Rogge, Ronald D.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
15
Pages
73-84
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990894117
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-07-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological flexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, cross-cultural adaptation, Mandarin translation, Japanese translation, measurement invariance, experiential avoidance, defusion, self-as-context, cross-cultural validation, well-being, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review