Cited by 25Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceEducation and Technology IntegrationGender and Technology in Education

A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Multimedia Technology on Creative Performance

Liu, Mengrong, Pang, Weiguo, Guo, Jiajun, Zhang, Yiwen·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-10981-1

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Pang, W., Guo, J., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
East China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Jiajun
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-03-10
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
8603-8630
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4220745195
Cited by
25
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
multimedia technology, creativity, human-computer interaction, originality, fluency, flexibility, elaboration, intervention duration, research design, creativity education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review