Effects of ChatGPT and Argument Map(AM)-Supported Online Argumentation on College Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Perceptions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability of GenAI tools to provide immediate feedback and model complex argumentative structures can facilitate the construction and evaluation of opposing perspectives.
“Furthermore, the ability of GenAI tools to provide immediate feedback and model complex argumentative structures can also facilitate the construction and evaluation of opposing perspectives [55].”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
Dewey, J. (1910) · D C Heath eBooks · doi:10.1037/10903-000 · Cited by 9,413 · see citing works
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552 · see citing works
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919899220 · Cited by 3,871 · see citing works
Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923640109527071 · Cited by 3,044 · see citing works
Dual coding theory and education
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320076 · Cited by 2,257 · see citing works
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20035 · Cited by 1,596 · see citing works
Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Cooper, G. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y · Cited by 1,263 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From this perspective, ChatGPT, capable of providing instant feedback for complex tasks (Cooper, 2023), could be utilized to facilitate students’ reevaluation of arguments and improve their critical thinking skills.”
Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649509526885 · Cited by 1,117 · see citing works
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.33.3 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
An Experiment in Development of Critical Thinking
Glaser, E. M. (1942) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146814204300507 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115 · Cited by 535 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in non-argumentative instructional activities, it is still common for students to over-rely on AI systems, utilizing ChatGPT to complete assignments without contributing to their original thoughts (Javaid et al., 2023).”
Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving
Cho, K.-L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02505022 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Weiler, A. (2004) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.09.009 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
PARTICIPATION AND CRITICAL THINKING IN ONLINE UNIVERSITY DISTANCE EDUCATION
Bullen, M. (1998) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 413 · see citing works
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13100998 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Studies in Reflecting Abstraction
Piaget, J. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315800509 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Hadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Juho Kim, J., Zhou, P., D. Kwon, Y., Hosny Saleh Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., et al. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: what questions should we ask of ChatGPT?
Rospigliosi, P. ‘. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Almulla, M. A. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2172929 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15042940 · Cited by 298 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When scaffolded by ChatGPT, learners are more inclined to reflect on their learning experiences, critically analyze diverse viewpoints, and articulate their ideas (Deng & Yu, 2023; Kim & Adlof, 2024), thereby facilitating the formulation of effective rebuttals.”
The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
In Search of Conversational Grain Size: Modeling Semantic Structure using Moving Stanza Windows
Siebert-Evenstone, A., Irgens, G. A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2017) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2017.43.7 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666 · Cited by 201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, teachers often encounter difficulties in providing comprehensive feedback due to the time-consuming nature of the process (Guo et al., 2022; Xu & Zhang, 2022).”
Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 · Cited by 188 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Another possible explanation is that in Guo et al. (2023), students were asked to formulate arguments individually without a chatbot or peer interaction during the post-test; they were still challenged to propose rebuttals by themselves.”
McKenzie, L. (1989) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1989.11775044 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
ChatGPT—A Challenging Tool for the University Professors in Their Teaching Practice
Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13101056 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills
Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation
Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104041 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
ChatGPT's capabilities in providing feedback on undergraduate students’ argumentation: A case study
Wang, L., Chen, X., Wang, C., Xu, L., Shadiev, R., & Li, Y. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101440 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationExtrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation
Hennessey, B. A., Moran, S., Altringer, B., & Amabile, T. M. (2015) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Management · doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom110098 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The Pros and Cons of Using ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Scoping Review
Mohammad, B., Supti, T., Alzubaidi, M., Shah, H., Alam, T., Shah, Z., & Househ, M. (2023) · Studies in Health Technology and Informatics · doi:10.3233/shti230580 · Cited by 114 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Contrary to previous study that have demonstrated the inappropriate output of ChatGPT misled students and weaken their critical thinking skills (Mohammad et al., 2023), argumentation, in which arguers aim to convince opponents of their viewpoints to win arguments (Hennessey et al., 2015),…”
Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking
Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P., & Mauriz, B. P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning
Pham, T. T., Nguyen, T. B., Ha, S., & Ngoc, N. T. N. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8825 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Lee, H., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., Lord, T., Mulholland, M., & Liu, O. L. (2019) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21504 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments
Kim, M., & Adlof, L. (2024) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-023-00899-x · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When scaffolded by ChatGPT, learners are more inclined to reflect on their learning experiences, critically analyze diverse viewpoints, and articulate their ideas (Deng & Yu, 2023; Kim & Adlof, 2024), thereby facilitating the formulation of effective rebuttals.”
Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Kadir, M. A. B. A. (2016) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.011 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
How to Better Engage Online Students with Online Strategies.
Britt, M. (2015) · College student journal · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Lee, H., Gweon, G.-H., Lord, T., Paessel, N., Pallant, A., & Pryputniewicz, S. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09889-7 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Tawfik, A. A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.035 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing
Fan, C., & Chen, G. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Demircioğlu, T., Karakuş, M., & Uçar, S. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
On critical thinking and content knowledge: A critique of the assumptions of cognitive load theory
Ellerton, P. J. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100975 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Penkauskienė, D., Railienė, A., & Cruz, G. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1586323 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Teaching critical thinking in a GE class: A flipped model
Smith, T. E., Rama, P., & Helms, J. (2018) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.010 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Murphy, E. (2004) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1349 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Darmawansah, D., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104516 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
de la Puente, M., Torres, J., Troncoso, A. L. B., Meza, Y. Y. H., & Carrascal, J. X. M. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00347-0 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
New Interpretations of Cohen’s Kappa
Warrens, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1155/2014/203907 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kaeppel, K. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100809 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Muhdhar, M. H. I. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.17.1.6 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
DOES PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IMPROVE CRITICAL THINKING SKILL?
Narmaditya, B. S., Wulandari, D., & Sakarji, S. R. (2018) · Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/cp.v38i3.21548 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives
Xu, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089 · Cited by 40 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, teachers often encounter difficulties in providing comprehensive feedback due to the time-consuming nature of the process (Guo et al., 2022; Xu & Zhang, 2022).”
Exploration of a group assessment model to foster student teachers’ critical thinking
Zhang, S., Li, H., Wen, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, T., & He, X. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101239 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Simonovic, B., Vione, K. C., Stupple, E. J. N., & Doherty, A. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101362 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rhoder, C., & French, J. N. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056110 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Students’ perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study
Rodger, D., & Stewart-Lord, A. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102681 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2021.1966633 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Zulkifli, N. N., Halim, N. D. A., Yahaya, N., & van der Meijden, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968960 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Fostering Sustainability and Critical Thinking through Debate—A Case Study
Rodríguez-Dono, A., & Hernández-Fernändez, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116397 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
An argumentation experience regarding concepts of calculus with ChatGPT
Urhan, S., Gençaslan, O., & Dost, Ş. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2308093 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The effect of online argumentation upon students' pseudoscientific beliefs
Tsai, C., Lin, C.-N., Shih, W.-L., et al. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.018 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Yilmaz-Na, E., & Sönmez, E. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104683 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Chen, X., Zhai, X., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101035 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, X., Zhao, H., Jin, H.-Y., & Li, Y. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101467 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationUcar-Longford, B., & Çevik, Y. D. (2020) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2020.1815107 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ngajie, B. N., Li, Y., Tiruneh, D. T., & Cheng, M. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100742 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Chen, X., Wang, L., Zhai, X., & Li, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856462 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationAppleTree system for effective computer-supported collaborative argumentation: an exploratory study
Chen, W., Tan, J. S. H., Zhang, S., Pi, Z., & Lyu, Q. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10258-5 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Technology-Enhanced CT: A Systematic Review
Sönmez, E. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100913 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Argument mapping as a pre-writing activity: Does it promote writing skills of EFL learners?
Liu, Q., Zhong, Z., & Nesbit, J. C. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12098-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The Practitioners' Guide to Teaching Thinking Series
Pritchard, M. S. (1992) · Thinking The Journal of Philosophy for Children · doi:10.5840/thinking199210210 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Kairu, C. (2020) · EdMedia + Innovate Learning · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Evaluation of Argument Mapping as a Learning Tool
Dwyer, C. P. (2011) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.13025/16650 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y., & Lin, C. J. (2021) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2021.118444 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Yilmaz-Na, E., & Sönmez, E. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101216 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., Zhang, E., Liu, H., & Han, S. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101588 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Assessment of structured classroom debate to teach an antimicrobial stewardship elective course
McGee, E.-A. U., Pius, M., & Mukherjee, K. (2019) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2019.11.016 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Archila, P. A., Molina, J. A., & de Mejía, A. T. (2020) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1800586 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Students’ Argumentation in Science Lessons
Anisa, A., Widodo, A., Riandi, R., & Muslim, M. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00320-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Constructs of argumentative writing in assessment tools
Hartwell, K. D., & Aull, L. L. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100675 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Challenges to improving higher education students' critical thinking capacity in China
Zhang, Q., Liu, Z., & Shen, H. (2023) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12570 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Archila, P. A., Gravier, G., Levy, L., Ortiz, B. T., Rodríguez, A., Wilches, L., de Mejía, A. T., & Restrepo, S. (2022) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2022.2062218 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“A Friend or A Foe” Determining Factors Contributed to the Use of ChatGPT among University Students
Yifan, W., Mengmeng, Y., & Omar, M. K. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/17400 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sönmez, E., Akkaş, B. N. Ç., & Memiş, E. K. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.33200/ijcer.791430 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Archila, P. A., Barbosa, V., Gravier, G., Levy, L., Ortiz, B. T., Wilches, L., de Mejía, A. T., & Restrepo, S. (2022) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2022.2119899 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Alsmari, N. A. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0131013 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
An evaluation of the perceptions of socio-humanities students on the skills of critical thinking
Mihail, R. (2023) · Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala · doi:10.18662/rrem/15.2/740 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Science and Mathematics Education in Multicultural Contexts: New Directions in Teaching and Learning
Forawi, S. (2020) · Common Ground Research Networks eBooks · doi:10.18848/978-1-86335-225-3/cgp · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Student Perceptions of a New Course Using Argumentation in Medical Education
Foy, A., Vrana, K. E., Haidet, P., Hausman, B. L., Adams, N. E., Ropson, I. J., Wolpaw, D. R., Rabago, D., Mailman, R. B., & Huang, X. (2023) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s394219 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kaya, S. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13067 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Using a Dialogical Approach to Examine Peer Feedback During Chemistry Investigative Task Discussion
Seng, M. G. J., & Hill, M. W. (2014) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9403-4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balart, T., Díaz, B., & Shryock, K. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19030179 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the ability of GenAI tools to provide immediate feedback and model complex argumentative structures can also facilitate the construction and evaluation of opposing perspectives [55].”
Alubthane, F. O. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1863931 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, X., Jia, B., Peng, X., Zhao, H., Yao, J., Wang, Z., & Zhu, S.
- Affiliations
- Henan University (CN)
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Shuhui
- Venue
- Education and Information Technologies
- Published
- 2025-03-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 17623-17658
- ISSN
- 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7608
- OpenAlex
- W4408379046
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 43.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, argument maps, online argumentation, critical thinking skills, university students, collaborative argumentation, rebuttal, information literacy, student perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
