Cited by 310Occupational Health and BurnoutTeacher Professional Development and MotivationEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preschool Teacher Well-Being: A Review of the Literature

Hall-Kenyon, Kendra M., Bullough, Robert V., MacKay, Kathryn Lake, Marshall, Esther E.·2014·Early Childhood Education Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10643-013-0595-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hall-Kenyon, K. M., Bullough, R. V., MacKay, K. L., & Marshall, E. E.
Venue
Early Childhood Education Journal
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
153-162
ISSN
  • 1082-3301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1707
OpenAlex
W2019179310
Cited by
310
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
24.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Early Childhood Education Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
preschool teachers, teacher well-being, teacher self-efficacy, life satisfaction, financial stability, teacher health, teacher autonomy, early childhood education reform, teacher accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review