Cited by 74Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Multidimensional Perfectionism and Test Anxiety: a Meta-analytic Review of Two Decades of Research

Burcaş, Sylvia, Creţu, Romeo Zeno·2021·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-020-09531-3

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burcaş, S., & Creţu, R. Z.
Affiliations
University of Bucharest (RO)
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
249-273
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W3033330481
Cited by
74
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
multidimensional perfectionism, test anxiety, perfectionistic concerns, perfectionistic strivings, cognitive test anxiety, publication bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review