Cited by 108Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationPersonality Traits and Psychology

A Meta–Analytic and Conceptual Update on the Associations between Procrastination and Multidimensional Perfectionism

Sirois, Fuschia M., Molnar, Danielle S., Hirsch, Jameson K.·2017·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

The equivocal and debated findings from a 2007 meta–analysis, which viewed perfectionism as a unidimensional construct, suggested that perfectionism was unrelated to procrastination. The present meta–analysis aimed to provide a conceptual update and reanalysis of the procrastination–perfectionism association guided by both a multidimensional view of perfectionism and self–regulation theory. The random–effects meta–analyses revealed a small to medium positive average effect size ( r = .23; k = 43, N = 10 000; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.19, 0.27]) for trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns and a small to medium negative average effect size ( r = −.22; k = 38, N = 9544; 95% CI [−0.26, −0.18]) for procrastination and perfectionistic strivings. The average correlations remained significant after statistically accounting for the joint variance between the two perfectionism dimensions via semi–partial correlations. For perfectionistic concerns, but not perfectionistic strivings, the effects depended on the perfectionism measure used. All effects did not vary by the trait procrastination measure used or the respondent's sex. Our findings confirm that from a multidimensional perspective, trait procrastination is both positively and negatively associated with higher–order perfectionism dimensions and further highlights the value of a self–regulation perspective for understanding the cognitive, affective and behavioural dynamics that characterise these traits. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This meta-analysis updates the 2007 Steel meta-analysis by treating perfectionism as multidimensional and finds trait procrastination is positively associated with perfectionistic concerns and negatively associated with perfectionistic strivings. The authors interpret the pattern through a self-regulation/control-theory framework.

Key findings

  • Trait procrastination had a small-to-medium positive average association with perfectionistic concerns, r = .23, k = 43, N = 10,000, 95% CI [0.19, 0.27], and a small-to-medium negative average association with perfectionistic strivings, r = -.22, k = 38, N = 9,544, 95% CI [-0.26, -0.18] (Table 2).
  • After statistically accounting for the shared variance between perfectionism dimensions via semi-partial correlations, effects remained significant and slightly larger: PC–TP semi-partial r = .256, k = 32, N = 7,909, 95% CI [.21, .30]; PS–TP semi-partial r = -.235, k = 32, N = 7,909, 95% CI [-.29, -.22].
  • For perfectionistic concerns, effects varied by perfectionism measure: APSR r = .333, MPS-HF r = .172, FMPS r = .140; for perfectionistic strivings, effects did not vary by perfectionism measure, procrastination measure, or sample type. Effects did not vary by respondent sex.
  • Publication-bias tests showed no evidence of bias: fail-safe N = 5,566 for PC (threshold 225) and 4,211 for PS (threshold 205); trim-and-fill and Egger’s tests were non-significant.

Methods

  • Systematic search of PsycINFO/PsycARTICLES (1985–Dec 2015) plus informal channels, forward/backward searches, and a Jan 1–Jun 30 2016 scan; 586 studies screened, 88 assessed, 44 retained. Included studies had usable effect sizes, trait/chronic procrastination, multidimensional trait perfectionism (PC or PS), unique effects, English, adult human samples.
  • Effect sizes were Pearson r; random-effects meta-analyses in CMA used Fisher’s z; dependent effects were averaged; semi-partial correlations were computed for studies reporting PC–PS correlations. Heterogeneity was assessed with Q and I²; moderators (perfectionism scale, procrastination scale, sample type, publication status, sex) were tested with mixed-effects models when ≥3 studies per subgroup; publication bias was assessed with fail-safe N, funnel plots, trim-and-fill, and Egger’s test.
  • For PC, 43 studies (14 published, 13 theses, 16 unpublished); for PS, 38 studies (11 published, 11 theses, 16 unpublished). Coding was double-coded by two authors with 98% agreement.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it used a broad multidimensional trait view of perfectionism; other conceptualizations (e.g., perfectionistic cognitions, perfectionistic self-presentation) and procrastinatory cognitions were not examined.
  • The paper states that semi-partial moderator analyses had too few studies to compare all three PC measures, several moderator subgroups had only 3–5 studies, and self-efficacy/impulsivity could not be formally tested because they were rarely included; none of the 44 studies assessed impulsivity.
  • The paper states that many unpublished studies/data sets were included, many from the authors’ labs, raising possible selection/quality concerns and the possibility of unfound studies; supplemental analyses mostly showed similar results. Evident from the text: the included effects are correlational/cross-sectional (unpublished data were cross-sectional or baseline), so causal direction cannot be established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.2098

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

18 of 114 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Overview of the Present Research

    Recent evidence indicates that the associations between different dimensions of perfectionism and various outcomes differ depending on whether the raw or the semi-partial correlation is used.

    “We include tests using semi-partial correlations as well as raw correlations in light of recent evidence indicating that the associations between different dimensions of perfectionism and various outcomes differ depending on whether the raw or the semi-partial correlation is used (A. P. Hill & Curran, 2015; Stoeber & Otto, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites A. P. Hill & Curran, 2015 source
    • cites Stoeber & Otto, 2006 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Recent psychometric tests of the APSR suggest that the discrepancy subscale includes items which tap negative affectivity, a key defining feature of trait procrastination.

    “However, recent psychometric tests of the APSR suggests that the discrepancy subscale includes items which tap negative affectivity, a key defining feature of trait procrastination (Sirois & Pychyl, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sirois & Pychyl, 2013 source

      The paper discusses negative mood and procrastination in “Procrastination and mood-regulation failure” (p. 12), but that does not address what APSR items measure. Searches for APSR, the discrepancy subscale, and psychometric tests found no passage assessing the scale or identifying negative affectivity as a defining feature of trait procrastination. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Alternative Views of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Trait procrastination demonstrates moderate-sized associations with avoidant coping.

    “trait procrastination demonstrates moderate-sized associations with avoidant coping, (Sirois & Kitner, 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sirois & Kitner, 2015 source
  • Premisecitation
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    For the chronic procrastinator, activation of negative self-evaluations that increase negative affect can trigger avoidant responses to the goal as a means of reducing mood and protecting self-esteem.

    “For the chronic procrastinator, activation of negative self-evaluations that increase negative affect can also trigger avoidant responses to the goal as a means of reducing mood and protecting self-esteem (Pychyl & Sirois, 2016; Sirois, 2004a; Sirois & Pychyl, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pychyl & Sirois, 2016 source
    • cites Sirois, 2004a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sirois & Pychyl, 2013 source
  • Premisecitation
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    Negative self-evaluations tend to plague both chronic procrastinators and those high in perfectionistic concerns.

    “negative self-evaluations, which tend to plague both chronic procrastinators and those high in perfectionistic concerns (Flett et al., 1995; McCown et al., 2012; Sherry et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Flett et al., 1995 source
    • cites McCown et al., 2012 source
    • cites Sherry et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims. 79
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualisations of Procrastination

    In behaviour genetics research with over 300 same-sex twin pairs, procrastination and impulsivity were indistinguishable at the genetic level, suggesting a shared evolutionary development of the two traits.

    “Indeed, in behaviour genetics research with over 300 same-sex twin pairs, procrastination and impulsivity were indistinguishable at the genetic level, suggesting a shared evolutionary development of the two traits (Gustavson et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gustavson et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    In one study, perfectionistic concerns was associated with lower self-efficacy prior to task performance and decreases in self-efficacy after failure feedback, whereas perfectionistic strivings were positively associated with self-efficacy.

    “For example, in one study perfectionistic concerns was associated with lower selfefficacy prior to task performance and decreases in self-efficacy after failure feedback, whereas perfectionistic strivings were positively associated with self-efficacy (Stoeber, Hutchfield, et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stoeber, Hutchfield, et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Conceptualisations of Procrastination

    As a trait, procrastination involves some degree of impulsiveness, but the needless delay of intended actions that defines the expressed trait of procrastination cannot be wholly attributed to impulsivity.

    “This evidence indicates that, as a trait, procrastination involves some degree of impulsiveness, but that the needless delay of intended actions that defines the expressed trait of procrastination cannot be wholly attributed to impulsivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gustavson et al., 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Current procrastination research is often criticized for focusing primarily on university student samples.

    “Despite the fact that current procrastination research is often criticized for focusing primarily on university student samples (Beutel et al., 2016; Sirois & Pychyl, 2016a), research on the correlates of procrastination have tended to demonstrate that the effects found in community adult samples tend to be quite similar to those found in student samples (e.g., Sirois, 2016b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beutel et al., 2016 source
    • cites Sirois & Pychyl, 2016a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analyses

    In general, I2 values of 25 percent reflect low heterogeneity, 50 percent reflect moderate heterogeneity, and 75 percent or more reflect high heterogeneity.

    “In general, I 2 values of 25 percent reflect low heterogeneity, 50 percent reflect moderate heterogeneity, and 75 percent or more reflect high heterogeneity. (Viechtbauer, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Viechtbauer, 2010 source

      The Random-effects model section (p. 14) explains that I² measures the percentage of variability attributable to heterogeneity, and the confidence-interval discussion (p. 14) describes a roughly 92% estimate as indicating considerable heterogeneity. Our copy does not give the claimed 25%, 50%, and 75% thresholds or their low, moderate, and high labels. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Alternative Views of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    In their behavioural genetics analysis, Gustavson and colleagues found that there was little shared variation between procrastination and impulsivity at the phenotypic and genotypic levels that was due to perfectionistic concerns, and concluded that perfectionism did not account for the procrastination-impulsivity relationship.

    “in their behavioural genetics analysis of procrastination and impulsivity, Gustavson and colleagues (2014) found that there was little shared variation between procrastination and impulsivity at the phenotypic and gentotypic levels that was due to perfectionistic concerns (as measured by the concerns over mistakes and the parental criticisms subscales of the FMPS; (Frost et al., 1990), and concl”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gustavson et al., 2014 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Frost et al., 1990 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    This account of the role of negative self-evaluations in the expectancy-assessment process and subsequent self-regulation failure dovetails with the emotion regulation models of procrastination and with the proposed associations between negative affect and end-state thinking in perfectionistic concerns.

    “This account of the role of negative self-evaluations in the expectancy-assessment process and subsequent self-regulation failure dovetails with the emotion regulation models of procrastination (Pychyl & Sirois, 2016; Sirois & Pychyl, 2013), and with the proposed associations between negative affect and end-state thinking in perfectionistic concerns (Flett, Hewitt, Blankstein, & Gray,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pychyl & Sirois, 2016 source
    • cites Sirois & Pychyl, 2013 source
    • cites Flett, Hewitt, Blankstein, & Gray, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    For perfectionistic strivings, more optimistic views of one's ability to reduce the discrepancy during the expectancy-assessment process will result in continued effort and thus greater chance of successful goal regulation.

    “For perfectionistic strivings, more optimistic views of one's ability to reduce this discrepancy during the expectancy-assessment process will result in continued effort (Eddington, 2013; Stoeber, Hutchfield, et al., 2008), and thus greater chance of successful goal regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eddington, 2013 source
    • cites Stoeber, Hutchfield, et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that perfectionistic striving was associated with higher self-efficacy and aspirations, and with choosing a more difficult task after success. This supports the claim about optimistic views of ability, but the paper does not establish that an expectancy-assessment process leads to continued effort. The statement about a greater chance of successful goal regulation follows the citations and is not judged as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Implications of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Associations

    Both trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are associated with low levels of mindfulness and self-compassion.

    “given that both traits are associated with low levels of these two qualities (Sirois & Pascual-Leone, 2013; Sirois & Tosti, 2012; Wimberley, Mintz, & Suh, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sirois & Pascual-Leone, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sirois & Tosti, 2012 source

      The Descriptive Statistics section reports that mindfulness measures were negatively associated with procrastination, supporting the trait-procrastination/low-mindfulness part of the claim. Our copy does not report an association involving perfectionistic concerns or measure self-compassion; its discussion of self-criticism does not establish the claimed self-compassion association. Page numbers were not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wimberley, Mintz, & Suh, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Implications of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Associations

    Self-regulation failure via problems in managing setbacks and failures has been linked to perfectionism and procrastination individually within other domains, and may therefore also be relevant for understanding how perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings relate to procrastination within the health domain.

    “Self-regulation failure via problems in managing setbacks and failures (i.e., the discrepancy between current and desired states) have been linked to perfectionism and procrastination individually within other domains (e.g., Pychyl & Sirois, 2016; Sagar & Stoeber, 2009; Sirois et al., 2010), and may therefore also be relevant for understanding how perfectionistic concerns and perfectionist”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pychyl & Sirois, 2016 source
    • cites Sagar & Stoeber, 2009 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sirois et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    All effects did not vary by the trait procrastination measure used or the respondent's sex.

    “All effects did not vary by the trait procrastination measure used or the respondent's sex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    For perfectionistic concerns, but not perfectionistic strivings, the effects depended on the perfectionism measure used.

    “For perfectionistic concerns, but not perfectionistic strivings, the effects depended on the perfectionism measure used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Moderator Analyses of Procrastination and Perfectionistic Concerns

    The effect sizes of procrastination with perfectionistic concerns varied significantly across the three different perfectionism measures, with studies that assessed perfectionistic concerns using the APSR having the largest effect sizes in comparison to studies that used FMPS or MPS-HF.

    “As expected, the effects sizes of procrastination with perfectionistic concerns varied significantly across the three different perfectionism measures, with studies that assessed perfectionistic concerns using the APSR having the largest effect sizes in comparison to studies that used FMPS or MPS-HF.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Moderator Analyses of Procrastination and Perfectionistic Concerns

    The effects for procrastination and perfectionistic concerns were significantly larger in studies using community samples than in studies using student samples.

    “However, the hypothesis that the effects with perfectionistic concerns would be consistent across samples was not supported, as the effects in the studies using community samples were significantly larger than those garnered from student samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Moderator Analyses of Procrastination and Perfectionistic Concerns

    The associations between perfectionistic concerns and procrastination were consistent across respondent sex for the raw correlations, b = .206 [-.09, .51], Qmodel (1) = 1.82, p = .18, Qresidual (41) = 34.98, p = .73, and the semi-partial correlations, b = .306 [-.02, .63], Qmodel (1) = 3.38, p = .07, Qresidual (30) = 31.29, p = .40.

    “As expected, the meta-regression revealed that the associations between perfectionistic concerns and procrastination were consistent across respondent sex for the raw correlations, b = .206 [-.09, .51], Qmodel (1) = 1.82, p = .18, Qresidual (41) = 34.98, p = .73, and the semi-partial correlations, b = .306 [-.02, .63], Qmodel (1) = 3.38, p = .07, Qresidual (30) = 31.29, p = .40.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Publication Bias Tests

    Egger's test of the intercept for procrastination and perfectionistic concerns was non-significant, b0 = -1.24 [-3.17, .69], t(41) = 1.29, p = .20, supporting a lack of publication bias.

    “Egger's test of the intercept was also non-significant, b 0 = -1.24 [-3.17, .69], t (41) = 1.29, p = .20, further supporting a lack of publication bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results Meta-analysis of Procrastination and Perfectionism Dimensions

    Tests of heterogeneity of the semi-partial correlations for perfectionistic concerns, Qtotal (31) = 159.25, p < .001; I2 = 80.53%, and perfectionistic strivings, Qtotal (31) = 81.83, p < .001; I2 = 62.12%, were also significant.

    “Tests of heterogeneity of the semi-partial correlations for perfectionistic concerns, Qtotal (31) = 159.25, p &lt; .001; I 2 = 80.53%, and perfectionistic strivings, Qtotal (31) = 81.83, p &lt; .001; I 2 = 62.12 %, were also significant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results Meta-analysis of Procrastination and Perfectionism Dimensions

    Statistically accounting for the overlapping variance between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, the average effect of procrastination with perfectionistic strivings remained negative and significant, and was larger by .017.

    “Statistically accounting for the overlapping variance between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, the average effect with procrastination remained negative and significant, and was larger by .017.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Analyses

    Supplemental analyses excluding studies using the doubts about actions, parental expectations, or parental criticism subscales of the FMPS and recoding remaining FMPS studies to the concern over mistakes subscale produced results that remained essentially the same for the overall meta-analysis of perfectionistic concerns and procrastination raw correlations, the semi-partial correlations, and the

    “Overall, the results remained essentially the same for the overall meta-analysis of the perfectionistic concerns and procrastination raw correlations, the semi-partial correlations, and the perfectionistic strivings and procrastination semi-partial correlations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Analyses

    The moderator analyses were nonsignificant for both the overall and semi-partial associations of trait procrastination and perfectionistic strivings when comparing effects from the authors' labs to other studies.

    “The moderator analyses were nonsignificant for both the overall and semi-partial associations of trait procrastination and perfectionistic strivings (see supplemental Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Publication Bias Tests

    The fail-safe N for perfectionistic strivings was 4,211, which exceeded the threshold of 205.

    “The fail-safe N for perfectionistic strivings was 4,211, which exceeded the threshold of 205.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Moderator Analyses of Procrastination and Perfectionistic Concerns

    The effect sizes for procrastination and perfectionistic concerns were equivalent across the different procrastination scales used, for both the raw correlations and the semi-partial correlations.

    “The hypothesis that the effect sizes would be equivalent across the different procrastination scales used was supported for both the subgroup analysis of the raw correlations, and the semi-partial correlations of perfectionistic concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Publication Bias Tests

    The funnel plot for procrastination and perfectionistic concerns showed no signs of asymmetry, and the trim and fill test resulted in no studies being trimmed, with identical obtained and imputed effects, r = .232 [.19, .27].

    “The funnel plot (see supplemental Figure 1) showed no signs of asymmetry and the trim and fill test resulted in no studies being trimmed, and thus identical values for the obtained and imputed effects, r = .232 [.19, .27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Analyses

    For perfectionistic concerns, the moderator analysis was significant at p = .04 for the raw correlations, with the effects from the authors' labs being significantly larger than those from other studies.

    “For perfectionistic concerns, the moderator analysis was significant at p = .04 for the raw correlations, with the effects from the authors' labs being significantly larger than those from other studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Moderator Analyses of Procrastination and Perfectionistic Concerns

    There were no sex-related differences concerning associations between perfectionistic strivings and procrastination, b = .118 [-.17, .41], Qmodel (1) = 0.64, p = .43, Qresidual (37) = 47.73, p = .11, or semi-partial correlations, b = .063 [-.17, .30], Qmodel (1) = 0.28, p = .60, Qresidual (30) = 35.41, p = .23.

    “There were also no sex-related differences concerning associations between perfectionistic strivings and procrastination, b = .118 [-.17, .41], Qmodel (1) = 0.64, p = .43, Qresidual (37) = 47.73, p = .11, or semi-partial correlations, b = .063 [-.17, .30], Qmodel (1) = 0.28, p = .60, Qresidual (30) = 35.41, p = .23.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results Meta-analysis of Procrastination and Perfectionism Dimensions

    The tests of heterogeneity of the effect sizes were significant for both perfectionistic concerns, Qtotal (42) = 198.08, p < .001; I2 = 78.80%, and perfectionistic strivings, Qtotal (36) = 161.65, p < .001; I2 = 76.49%.

    “The tests of heterogeneity of the effect sizes were significant for both perfectionistic concerns, Qtotal (42) = 198.08, p &lt; .001; I 2 = 78.80%, and perfectionistic strivings, Qtotal (36) = 161.65, p &lt; .001; I 2 = 76.49%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results Meta-analysis of Procrastination and Perfectionism Dimensions

    After statistically accounting for the joint variance between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings (i.e., semi-partial correlations), the average effect size for procrastination and perfectionistic concerns remained positive and significant, and was larger by .025.

    “After statistically accounting for the joint variance between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings (i.e., semi-partial correlations), the average effect size remained positive and significant, and was larger by .025.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Analyses

    For the adjusted, semi-partial correlations of perfectionistic concerns, the moderation analysis was non-significant, indicating that once the contribution of perfectionistic strivings was accounted for, the effects from the authors' labs were no longer different from those from other studies.

    “However, for the adjusted, semi-partial correlations, the moderation analysis was non-significant, indicating that once the contribution of perfectionistic strivings were accounted for, the effects from studies in the authors' labs were no longer different from those from other studies (see supplemental Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    The effects of trait procrastination with perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings were robust to the measure of trait procrastination used and the respondent's sex.

    “Moderator analysis further confirmed that the effects of trait procrastination with perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings were robust to the measure of trait procrastination used and the respondent's sex”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § References

    The association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by lab origin (Q model = 4.39, p < .05), with studies from the authors' lab showing a stronger average correlation (.314) than other studies (.192).

    “| Overall | 43 | 10,000 | .221 | [.18, .26] | 4.39* | 78.80 | 32 | 7,909 | .243 | [.20, .29] | 3.24 | 80.53 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Table 4.

    Excluding studies that used the FMPS Parental Criticisms, Parental Concerns, and Doubts About Actions subscales, the association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by perfectionism scale (Q model = 19.80, p < .01), with the APSR yielding a stronger average correlation (.333) than the MPS-HF (.172) or FMPS (.122).

    “| Perfectionism scale | 35 | 8,531 | .268 | [.23, .31] | 19.80** | 80.49 | 29 | 7,601 | .310 | [.28, .34] | 16.94** | 76.64 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § References

    Excluding studies that used the PNPS, the association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by sample type (Q model = 4.14, p < .05), with community samples showing a stronger average correlation (.314) than student samples (.215).

    “| Sample | 40 | 9,675 | .238 | [.20, .28] | 4.14* | 79.81 | 29 | 7,584 | .257 | [.21, .30] | 3.00 | 81.99 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Limitations

    Of the 16 unpublished data sets, only 9 had not been previously subjected to peer review, and of these, 7 were in preparation for submission for peer-review.

    “Only 9 had not been previously subjected to peer review, and of these, 7 were in preparation for submission for peer-review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Conclusions

    The current meta-analysis confirms that trait procrastination is differentially associated with higher order perfectionism dimensions, such that there is a small sized positive association with perfectionistic concerns, and a small sized negative association with perfectionistic strivings.

    “The current meta-analysis confirms that trait procrastination is differentially associated with higher order perfectionism dimensions, such that there is a small sized positive association with perfectionistic concerns, and a small sized negative association with perfectionistic strivings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of studies retrieved for the meta-analysis is representative of all studies on procrastination and perfectionism.
    • Rests on an assumption: The measures of perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings used across the included studies are sufficiently comparable to be pooled in the meta-analysis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § References

    The association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by sample type (Q model = 4.53, p < .05), with community samples showing a stronger average correlation (.314) than student samples (.212).

    “| Sample | 43 | 10,000 | .233 | [.19, .27] | 4.53* | 78.80 | 32 | 7,909 | .252 | [.21, .30] | 3.26 | 80.53 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § References

    The association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic strivings is moderated by publication status (Q model = 5.19, p < .05), with unpublished studies showing a stronger negative average correlation (-.248) than published studies (-.140).

    “| Publication status | 39 | 9,544 | -.219 | [-.26, -.18] | 5.19* | 76.49 | 32 | 7,909 | -.261 | [-.29, -.23] | 2.71 | 62.12 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Supplemental Table 4.

    Excluding studies that used the FMPS Parental Criticisms, Parental Concerns, and Doubts About Actions subscales, the association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by sample type (Q model = 3.97, p < .05), with community samples showing a stronger average correlation (.314) than student samples (.216).

    “| Sample | 40 | 9,511 | .240 | [.20, .28] | 3.97* | 80.33 | 32 | 7,926 | .266 | [.23, .30] | 2.12 | 75.06 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § References

    The association between trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns is moderated by the perfectionism scale used (Q model = 28.40, p < .01), with the APSR yielding a stronger average correlation (.333) than the MPS-HF (.172) or FMPS (.140).

    “| Perfectionism scale | 36 | 8,737 | .243 | [.21, .28] | 28.40** | 80.49 | 26 | 7,146 | .314 | [.28, .35] | 16.41** | 78.45 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Perfectionism as a Multidimensional Construct

    According to the multidimensional view of perfectionism, two higher-order dimensions of trait perfectionism are commonly identified from the most frequently used and well-validated measures in the field.

    “According to the multidimensional view of perfectionism, two higher-order dimensions of trait perfectionism are commonly identified from the most frequently used and well-validated measures in the field”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites P. L. Hewitt & Flett, 1991 source
    • cites Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990 source
    • cites Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract

    From a multi-dimensional perspective, trait procrastination is both positively and negatively associated with higher order perfectionism dimensions.

    “Our findings confirm that from a multi-dimensional perspective, trait procrastination is both positively and negatively associated with higher order perfectionism dimensions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualisations of Procrastination

    Procrastination can be viewed along a spectrum ranging from a chronic pattern of behaviour that is akin to a relatively enduring personality-like trait that manifests across a range of life domains at one end, to a domain specific phenomena that manifests as unnecessary delay in specific contexts, such as academic life at the other end.

    “Procrastination can be viewed along a spectrum ranging from a chronic pattern of behaviour that is akin to a relatively enduring personality-like trait that manifests across a range of life domains at one end, to a domain specific phenomena that manifests as unnecessary delay in specific contexts, such as academic life at the other end (Sirois, 2016a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sirois, 2016a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    The FMPS assesses perfectionistic concerns with four subscales: concern over mistakes, doubts about actions, parental criticism, and high parental expectations.

    “For example, the FMPS (Frost et al., 1990) assesses perfectionistic concerns with 4 subscales, concern over mistakes, doubts about actions, parental criticism, and high parental expectations (Frost, Heimberg, Holt, Mattia, &amp; Neubauer, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Frost et al., 1990 source
    • cites Frost et al., 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Procrastination and Perfectionism: Convergence and Divergence in Self-Regulation Failure

    According to Cybernetic Big Five theory, the higher order personality factors, conscientiousness and (low) neuroticism, are two of three superordinate traits key for successful self-regulation, being subsumed under the meta-trait stability that is essential for shielding goals from the disruptive influence of impulses.

    “According to Cybernetic Big Five theory (DeYoung, 2014, 2015), the higher order personality factors, conscientiousness and (low) neuroticism, are two of three superordinate traits key for successful self-regulation, being subsumed under the meta-trait stability that is essential for shielding goals from the disruptive influence of impulses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DeYoung, 2014, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    There is little research into the potential differences in standards between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, and what research there is tends to not support the position that they differ in standards.

    “However, there is little research into the potential differences in standards between perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, and what research there is tends to not support this position.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    The two key dimensions of perfectionism (perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings) are generally viewed as separate, yet related factors that are often divergent with respect to consequential outcomes.

    “As noted previously, the two key dimensions of perfectionism (i.e., perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings), are generally viewed as separate, yet related factors that are often divergent with respect to consequential outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualisations of Procrastination

    When measured as a trait, procrastination shows good long-term stability, with a 10-year test-retest correlation of .77.

    “Indeed, there is some evidence that when measured as a trait, procrastination shows good long-term stability, with a 10-year test-retest correlation of .77 (Steel, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Procrastination is known to be negatively related to conscientiousness, whereas perfectionism can be viewed as being positively related to conscientiousness given its characteristic tendencies towards being organized.

    “From this perspective, procrastination is known to be negatively related to conscientiousness (Steel, 2007; Van Eerde, 2003), whereas, perfectionism can be viewed as being positively related to conscientiousness given its characteristic tendencies towards being organized (Steel, 2010b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
    • cites Van Eerde, 2003 source
    • cites Steel, 2010b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Procrastination and Perfectionism: Convergence and Divergence in Self-Regulation Failure

    Trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns share commonalities with respect to constructs related to self-regulation, whereas trait procrastination and perfectionistic strivings show divergent relations.

    “Table 1 provides an illustrative summary of how trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns share commonalities with respect to constructs related to self-regulation, whereas trait procrastination and perfectionistic strivings show divergent relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § Procrastination and Perfectionism: Convergence and Divergence in Self-Regulation Failure

    Both procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are consistently linked to more maladaptive forms of coping such as disengagement and avoidance, which favor immediate needs over behaviour for meeting long-term goals.

    “Both procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are consistently linked to more maladaptive forms of coping such as disengagement and avoidance, which favor immediate needs over behaviour for meeting long-term goals (see Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Negative self-evaluations can bias the expectancy-assessment process towards judging that one is not capable of reducing the perceived discrepancy between the desired and current states, and such thoughts may contribute to poor self-regulation.

    “To the extent that negative self-evaluations can bias the expectancy-assessment process towards judging that one is not capable of reducing the perceived discrepancy between the desired and current states, such thoughts may contribute to poor self-regulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings are generally accepted as the two overarching dimensions of perfectionism.

    “Although perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings are generally accepted as the two overarching dimensions of perfectionism (Sirois &amp; Molnar, 2016a), the way in which each is conceptualized and measured can vary considerably across different measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sirois & Molnar, 2016a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    The current evidence suggests that perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings perfectionists do not differ with respect to their referent points.

    “However, the current evidence suggests that perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings perfectionists do not differ with respect to their referent points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    It is important that perfectionism be examined as a multidimensional construct in relation to procrastination because the associations of each dimension with key outcomes are often in opposing directions, and could therefore yield attenuated or nonsignificant associations if perfectionism is viewed as a unidimensional construct.

    “It is important that perfectionism be examined as a multidimensional construct in relation to procrastination because the associations of each dimension with key outcomes are often in opposing directions, and could therefore yield attenuated or nonsignificant associations if perfectionism is viewed as a unidimensional construct.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    The shared associations of perfectionistic concerns and trait procrastination with negative self-evaluations are posited to incline people high on these traits to have unfavourable expectancies about being able to reduce discrepancy, which will result in disengaging from or abandoning their goal.

    “The shared associations of perfectionistic concerns and trait procrastination with negative self-evaluations (e.g., self-criticism), are posited to incline people high on these traits to have unfavourable expectancies about being able to reduce discrepancy, which will result in disengaging from or abandoning their goal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    In 2007, Steel conducted the first meta-analysis on the topic of procrastination, which included a sub-analysis of the relations of procrastination and perfectionism.

    “In 2007, Steel conducted the first meta-analysis on the topic of procrastination, which included a sub-analysis of the relations of procrastination and perfectionism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    The previous meta-analysis does not address the associations between multidimensional perfectionism and procrastination, making an update both prudent and necessary.

    “For these reasons, the previous meta-analysis does not address the associations between multidimensional perfectionism and procrastination, making an update both prudent and necessary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Current evidence generally supports the proposition that both trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are associated with fewer perceived resources for self-regulation and negative self-evaluations, whereas perfectionistic strivings is associated with greater perceived resources, and high self-efficacy.

    “Current evidence generally supports this proposition, as both trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are associated with fewer perceived resources for self-regulation and negative self-evaluations, whereas perfectionistic strivings is associated with greater perceived resources, and high self-efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § Procrastination and Perfectionism: Convergence and Divergence in Self-Regulation Failure

    Procrastination and perfectionistic concerns show consistent links to self-regulation constructs associated with negative affect, whereas perfectionistic strivings has a more inconsistent and negative pattern of associations with these constructs.

    “As outlined in Table 1, procrastination and perfectionistic concerns show consistent links to self-regulation constructs associated with negative affect, whereas perfectionistic strivings has a more inconsistent and negative pattern of associations with these constructs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Similar differential relations have been noted with goal-related optimism, with perfectionistic concerns linked to less optimism about goal success, whereas perfectionistic strivings was linked to greater optimism about goal success.

    “Similar differential relations have been noted with goal-related optimism, with perfectionistic concerns linked to less optimism about goal success, whereas perfectionistic strivings was linked to greater optimism about goal success (Eddington, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eddington, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    The MPS-HF and the APSR, revised, each assesses perfectionistic concerns with one subscale: socially-prescribed perfectionism (SPP) for the MPS-HF, and discrepancy for the APSR.

    “In contrast, the MPS-HF (P. L. Hewitt &amp; Flett, 1991) and the APSR (Slaney et al., 2001), revised, each assesses perfectionistic concerns with one subscale, socially-prescribed perfectionism (SPP) for the MPS-HF, and discrepancy, for the APSR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites P. L. Hewitt & Flett, 1991 source
    • cites Slaney et al., 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Procrastination and Perfectionism: Convergence and Divergence in Self-Regulation Failure

    The evidence on self-regulation is primarily descriptive and does not provide clear insights into the self-regulatory mechanisms that might explain the potential convergent and divergent relations between procrastination and perfectionism.

    “Nonetheless this evidence is primarily descriptive and does not provide clear insights into the self-regulatory mechanisms that might explain the potential convergent and divergent relations between procrastination and perfectionism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Perfectionism as a Multidimensional Construct

    Consistent support for a multidimensional model of trait perfectionism has been garnered from behaviour genetics research with a sample of 1,022 twin pairs and from studies establishing that the different dimensions of perfectionism are differentially related to a wide range of consequential outcomes.

    “Consistent support for a multidimensional model of trait perfectionism has been garnered not only from behaviour genetics research with a sample of 1,022 twin pairs (Tozzi et al., 2004), but also from studies which have established that the different dimensions of perfectionism are differentially related to a wide range of consequential outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tozzi et al., 2004 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Such studies were categorized as reflecting the construct fear of failure and grouped with studies using measures of evaluation anxiety, self-consciousness, and fear of failure (k = 57).

    “Instead, such studies were categorized as reflecting the construct fear of failure and grouped with studies using measures of evaluation anxiety, self-consciousness, and fear of failure ( k = 57; Steel, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Socially prescribed perfectionism on its own was weakly related to procrastination (r = .18).

    “Although it was noted that socially prescribed perfectionism on its own was weakly related to procrastination ( r = .18)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Previous Meta-Analysis of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    The conclusion that procrastination is negatively, if at all, related to perfectionism was based on the average negative correlation reported for perfectionism as assessed by self-oriented and other-oriented perfectionism (r = -.03), suggesting that socially prescribed perfectionism (or perfectionistic concerns as the higher order dimension) was not conceptualised as part of the perfectionism构造.

    “The conclusion that procrastination is negatively, if at all, related to perfectionism (Steel, 2007; 2010b), was based on the average negative correlation reported for perfectionism as assessed by selforiented and other-oriented perfectionism ( r = -.03), suggesting that socially prescribed perfectionism (or perfectionistic concerns as the higher order dimension) was not conceptualised as part of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
    • cites Steel, 2010b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § A Control Theory View of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Relationship

    Given the subjective nature of perceptions and expectancies, individual differences should play a pivotal role in both the assessment of resources, and subsequent expectancies for being able to reduce (or increase) the discrepancy between the current and desired states.

    “Given the subjective nature of perceptions and expectancies, individual differences should play a pivotal role in both the assessment of resources, and subsequent expectancies for being able to reduce (or increase) the discrepancy between the current and desired states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analyses

    According to Cohen's guidelines, effects of r = .10 are considered small, r = .30 medium, and r = .50 large.

    “According to Cohen's (1992) guidelines, effects of r = .10 are considered to be small, r = .30 to be medium, and r = .50 to be large.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen's (1992) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    The discrepancy subscale of the APSR taps more directly into the self-regulation expectancy-assessment proposed to link trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns.

    “In addition, the discrepancy subscale of the APSR taps more directly into the self-regulation expectancy-assessment proposed to link trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Both the MPS-HF and the APSR appear to adequately assess perfectionistic strivings.

    “For example, both the MPS-HF and the APSR appear to adequately assess perfectionistic strivings (R. W. Hill, McIntire, &amp; Bacharach, 1997; Molnar, Sadava, Flett, &amp; Colautti, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites R. W. Hill, McIntire, & Bacharach, 1997
    • cites Molnar, Sadava, Flett, & Colautti, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    All coding of effects was performed independently by two of the authors who conduct research regularly on procrastination and/or perfectionism.

    “All coding of effects was performed independently by two of the authors who conduct research regularly on procrastination and/or perfectionism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    There is less empirical evidence regarding the equivalencies of different measures of chronic or trait procrastination.

    “There is less empirical evidence regarding the equivalencies of different measures of chronic or trait procrastination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analyses

    When used in tandem and there is consensus among the results, multiple approaches can help reduce Type 1 error in assessing publication bias.

    “When used in tandem and there is consensus among the results, these multiple approaches can help reduce Type 1 error in assessing publication bias (Card, 2012; Ferguson &amp; Brannick, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Card, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ferguson & Brannick, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Methods

    The agreement rate from the double coding was high (98 percent), with only one discrepancy, which was settled through discussion.

    “The agreement rate from the double coding was high (98 percent), with only one discrepancy, which was settled through discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Lay's General Procrastination scale focuses on procrastination as a tendency across a wider range of settings.

    “Lay's (1986) General Procrastination scale focuses on procrastination as a tendency across a wider range of settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lay, 1986 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Supplemental Analyses

    To the extent that self-report measures of perfectionism and procrastination include items with overlapping content, associations between these constructs may be artificially inflated.

    “To the extent that self-report measures of perfectionism and procrastination include items with overlapping content, associations between these constructs may be artificially inflated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overview of the Present Research

    This is a particularly salient issue when examining correlates and outcomes of perfectionistic strivings, in which raw correlations often illustrate mixed findings whereas semi-partial correlations often reveal relatively more positive aspects of perfectionistic strivings.

    “This is a particularly salient issue when examining correlates and outcomes of perfectionistic strivings in which raw correlations often illustrate mixed findings whereas semi-partial correlations often reveal relatively more positive aspects of perfectionistic strivings (Stoeber &amp; Otto, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stoeber & Otto, 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Moderators of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    The TPS and API were specifically developed and designed to test procrastination as a characteristic way of behaving in academic settings, and have been used most frequently with student populations.

    “However, the latter two were specifically developed and designed to test procrastination as a characteristic way of behaving in academic settings, and have been used most frequently with student populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overview of the Present Research

    Research on procrastination, perfectionism and their correlates has burgeoned in recent years, indicating that an update is timely and important to gain current insights into the nomological networks of each.

    “Research on procrastination, perfectionism and their correlates has burgeoned in recent years indicating that such an update is both timely and important to gain current insights into the nomological networks of each (Cumming, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cumming, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Overview of the Present Research

    The previous meta-analysis did not take a multidimensional view of perfectionism, making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions about the ways in which trait procrastination is related to widely accepted major dimensions of perfectionism.

    “More importantly, the previous meta-analysis did not take a multidimensional view of perfectionism (Steel, 2007), making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions about the ways in which trait procrastination is related to widelyaccepted major dimensions of perfectionism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel, 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Implications of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Associations

    Trait procrastination and perfectionism are each known to have consequences for academic performance.

    “Trait procrastination and perfectionism are each known to have consequences for academic performance (e.g., Rice, Richardson, &amp; Ray, 2016; Solomon &amp; Rothblum, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rice, Richardson, & Ray, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Solomon & Rothblum, 1984 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Discussion

    The current meta-analysis examined a much larger sample of studies than the Steel (2007) meta-analysis, including 44 studies (N = 10,454) for trait procrastination, compared to 24 studies (N = 3,884) in the 2007 meta-analysis.

    “We also examined a much larger sample of studies than the Steel (2007) meta-analysis, including 44 studies ( N = 10,454) for trait procrastination, compared to 24 studies ( N = 3,884) in the 2007 meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steel (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Alternative Views of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Perfectionistic strivings was consistently related to all components of reward sensitivity (BAS), but was also associated with the BIS, whereas perfectionistic concerns was linked to the BIS and the impulsivity component of the BAS.

    “Although perfectionistic strivings was consistently related to all components of reward sensitivity (BAS), it was also associated with the BIS, whereas perfectionistic concerns was linked to the BIS, and the impulsivity component of the BAS (Stoeber &amp; Corr, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stoeber & Corr, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Alternative Views of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    Perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings have been differentially associated with approach and avoidance behavior.

    “perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings have been differentially associated with approach and avoidance behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Slade & Owens, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    From this self-regulation perspective, the findings from the current meta-analysis indicate that perfectionistic concerns can be detrimental for achieving goals, whereas perfectionistic strivings may have some benefits.

    “From this self-regulation perspective, the findings from the current meta-analysis indicate that perfectionistic concerns can be detrimental for achieving goals, whereas perfectionistic strivings may have some benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-regulation framework's proposed mechanisms (negative self-evaluations and expectancy-assessment) are valid for explaining the procrastination-perfectionism associations.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    The current findings contribute to the debate about perfectionism in the extant literature, which suggests that some forms and foci of perfectionism (perfectionistic strivings) may be beneficial, whereas other manifestations (perfectionistic concerns) are generally deleterious.

    “Consequently, the current findings contribute to the debate about perfectionism in the extant literature, which suggests that some forms and foci of perfectionism (perfectionistic strivings) may be beneficial (e.g., Stoeber &amp; Corr, 2016), whereas other manifestations (perfectionistic concerns) are generally deleterious (e.g., Sirois &amp; Molnar, 2016a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stoeber & Corr, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sirois & Molnar, 2016a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Implications of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Associations

    The interaction of perfectionism and procrastination within the health domain is understudied, despite the fact that each is well-known to have consequences for health and well-being.

    “The interaction of perfectionism and procrastination within the health domain is also understudied, despite the fact that each is well-known to have consequences for health and well-being (e.g., Sirois &amp; Molnar, 2016b; Sirois &amp; Pychyl, 2016b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sirois & Molnar, 2016b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sirois & Pychyl, 2016b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    Both trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are associated with tendencies to perceive oneself as being less capable of reducing the discrepancy between desired and current states that is central to taking timely, goal-directed action.

    “As noted previously, both trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are associated with tendencies to perceive oneself as being less capable of reducing the discrepancy between desired and current states that is central to taking timely, goal-directed action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    The increased numbers reflect the growth in research into perfectionism and procrastination since the meta-analysis conducted in 2007.

    “These increased numbers reflect the growth in research into perfectionism and procrastination since the meta-analysis conducted in 2007.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    When goals are routinely set too high, this creates a greater discrepancy between current and desired states, which, when coupled with enduring tendencies to view success as being less likely, can contribute to goal withdrawal.

    “For example, when goals are routinely set too high, this creates a greater discrepancy between current and desired states, which, when coupled with enduring tendencies to view success as being less likely, can contribute to goal withdrawal (Carver &amp; Scheier, 1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carver & Scheier, 1982 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § The Procrastination-Perfectionism Association from a Self-Regulation Perspective

    According to Control Theory, perceiving oneself as less capable of reducing the discrepancy can result in avoidance or withdrawal from the goal, or continued effort with less enthusiasm or intensity and thus less chance of success.

    “According to Control Theory (Carver &amp; Scheier, 1982), this can result in avoidance or withdrawal from the goal, which may or may not be resumed at a later time, or continued effort, albeit with less enthusiasm or intensity, and thus less chance of success.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carver & Scheier, 1982 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Alternative Views of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Association

    According to the dual process model of perfectionism, individuals with high levels of perfectionistic strivings are driven by the pursuit of success, whereas individuals with high levels of perfectionistic concerns are motivated by a fear of failure.

    “according to this 'dual process model' of perfectionism (Slade &amp; Owens, 1998), individuals with high levels of perfectionistic strivings are driven by the pursuit of success, whereas individuals with high levels of perfectionistic concerns are motivated by a fear of failure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Slade & Owens, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    Taking a multi-dimensional view of perfectionism provided a more accurate assessment of the differential associations of trait procrastination with perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, associations which were likely obscured in the previous meta-analysis.

    “Taking a multi-dimensional view of perfectionism provided a more accurate assessment of the differential associations of trait procrastination with perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings, associations which were likely obscured in the previous meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Implications of the Procrastination-Perfectionism Associations

    Both procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are linked to increased stress in response to self-regulation failures, which can further compromise health.

    “Both procrastination and perfectionistic concerns are also linked to increased stress in response to self-regulation failures (Dunkley, Solomon-Krakus, &amp; Moroz, 2016; Sirois, 2016b), which can further compromise health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dunkley, Solomon-Krakus, & Moroz, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sirois, 2016b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Limitations

    Perfectionism can also be viewed as the frequency with which automatic perfectionistic thoughts are experienced, and as a self-presentation style characterized by defensive self-concealment.

    “perfectionism can also be viewed as the frequency with which automatic perfectionistic thoughts are experienced (e.g., Perfectionistic Cognitions Inventory (PCI); Flett, Hewitt, Blankstein &amp; Gray, 1998), and as a self-presentation style characterized by defensive selfconcealment (e.g., Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale (PSPS); Hewitt et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Flett, Hewitt, Blankstein & Gray, 1998 source
    • cites Hewitt et al., 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Limitations

    The findings should be considered in light of the large number of unpublished studies and data sets included in the meta-analysis.

    “The findings should also be considered in light of the large number of unpublished studies and data sets included in the meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Limitations

    The research included in the current meta-analysis viewed perfectionism as a broad, multidimensional personality trait.

    “The research included in the current meta-analysis viewed perfectionism as a broad, multidimensional personality trait.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusions

    When viewed from the perspective of Control theory, these findings indicate that trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns may be characterized by similar negative self-evaluation tendencies that interfere with effective self-regulation and goal achievement, whereas perfectionistic strivings may have some benefits for timely goal achievement.

    “When viewed from the perspective of Control theory (Carver &amp; Scheier, 1982), these findings indicate that trait procrastination and perfectionistic concerns may be characterized by similar negative self-evaluation tendencies that interfere with effective self-regulation and goal achievement, whereas perfectionistic strivings may have some benefits for timely goal achievement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carver & Scheier, 1982 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-regulation framework's proposed mechanisms (negative self-evaluations and expectancy-assessment) are valid for explaining the procrastination-perfectionism associations.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Limitations

    All of the data from the unpublished studies was collected from cross-sectional studies or taken from the cross-sectional, pre-experimental baseline component of a study, and used well-validated and accepted measures of the key constructs.

    “all of the data from the unpublished studies was collected from cross-sectional studies or taken from the cross-sectional, pre-experimental baseline component of a study, and used well-validated and accepted measures of the key constructs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cross-sectional data from the included studies can support the meta-analytic associations without causal inference.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Limitations

    Research examining how alternative conceptualizations of perfectionism and procrastination relate is scarce.

    “Research examining how alternative conceptualizations of perfectionism and procrastination relate is scarce”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Limitations

    Currently, self-efficacy and impulsivity are rarely included in research examining the procrastination-perfectionism relationship, and so it was not possible to formally test the contribution of these traits.

    “Currently, however, self-efficacy and impulsivity are rarely included in research examining the procrastination-perfectionism relationship, and so it was not possible to formally test the contribution of these traits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Limitations

    Researchers have proposed cognitive construals of procrastination, such as procrastinatory cognitions, which reflect automatic negative thoughts related to procrastination that are important for understanding the cognitive-behavioral aspects of procrastination.

    “Similarly, researchers have proposed cognitive construals of procrastination, such as procrastinatory cognitions, which reflect automatic negative thoughts related to procrastination that are important for understanding the cognitive-behavioral aspects of procrastination (Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, &amp; Lay, 2012; Stainton, Lay, &amp; Flett, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, & Lay, 2012 source
    • cites Stainton, Lay, & Flett, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

101 of 101
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The set of studies retrieved for the meta-analysis is representative of all studies on procrastination and perfectionism.

    “it is likely that many did not, raising the possibility that there may be a number of unfound studies that were not included.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The measures of perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings used across the included studies are sufficiently comparable to be pooled in the meta-analysis.

    “The research included in the current meta-analysis viewed perfectionism as a broad, multidimensional personality trait.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The self-regulation framework's proposed mechanisms (negative self-evaluations and expectancy-assessment) are valid for explaining the procrastination-perfectionism associations.

    “We have also proposed that negative self-evaluations, which tend to plague both chronic procrastinators and those high in perfectionistic concerns (Flett et al., 1995; McCown et al., 2012; Sherry et al., 2016), may present an additional vulnerability for poor selfregulation by biasing perceptions during the expectancy-assessment process towards a lack of resources for coping with the goal”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cross-sectional data from the included studies can support the meta-analytic associations without causal inference.

    “all of the data from the unpublished studies was collected from cross-sectional studies or taken from the cross-sectional, pre-experimental baseline component of a study”
4 of 4

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(41) = 1.29reported p = .2 · recomputed p = .204

    “t (41) = 1.29, p = .20”

  • Consistentt(37) = 0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .494

    “t (37) = 0.69, p = .50”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Overall participant total differs between discussion and Table 2

    Minor

    The discussion gives 10,454 participants across 44 studies, whereas the heading for the same 44-study set in Table 2 gives 10,554.

  • Perfectionistic strivings-self-criticism direction conflicts with Table 1

    Minor

    The text says perfectionistic strivings is negatively related to self-criticism, while Table 1 summarizes that association as positive or nonsignificant.

  • Moderator rationale says all four heterogeneity values exceed 75%

    Minor

    The paper says all four I2 values exceed 75%, but it reports 62.12% for the perfectionistic-strivings semi-partial correlations.

  • Community semi-partial estimate falls outside its confidence interval

    Minor

    Table 3 reports a community-sample semi-partial estimate of .235 with a confidence interval starting at .24. The supplemental analysis reports .333 with that same interval and subgroup size.

  • Perfectionistic-strivings participant total differs across reported results

    Minor

    The abstract reports N = 9,544 for the 38-study perfectionistic-strivings analysis, but Table 2 reports N = 9,554 for its PS-TP correlation.

  • Abstract gives a positive upper confidence limit for a negative association

    Minor

    The abstract reports a 95% confidence interval extending to +0.18 for the negative perfectionistic-strivings association. The results report the upper limit as −0.18, which also matches the statement that the association is significant.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Aitken M. E., 1982, A personality profile of the college student procrastinator
  2. * Beadman K. (2014). Perceptions of procedural and distributive justice in a teleworking context. (BA Psychology thesis), Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  3. Borenstein M., 2005, Comprehensive meta–analysis (version 2)
  4. Burns L. R., 2000, Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15, 35
  5. * Campbell M. (2015). Identifying with a future body image: Effects on intentions to engage in health behaviours and self–evaluations. (BA Psychology thesis), Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  6. Elison J., 2012, Journal of Sport Behavior, 35, 19
  7. * Eren E. (2010). Better late than never: Exploring procrastination in the academic setting: studying intentions, academic self–efficacy, and vulnerability to temptations. (BA Psychology thesis), University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
  8. * Essau C., Ederer E., O'Callaghan J. & Aschemann B. (2008). Doing it now or doing it later? Correlates, predictors and prevention of academic, decisional, and general procrastination among students in Austria. Paper presented at the 8th Alps–Adria Psychology Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  9. Fee R. L., 2000, Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15, 167
  10. Hill R. W., 1997, Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 257
  11. Martin L. L., 1989, Unintended thought, 306
  12. Molnar D. S., The psychology of perfectionism: Theory, research, applications
  13. 10.1080/15298860390129863 · DOI
  14. Onwuegbuzie A. J., 2000, Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15, 103
  15. * Simpson M. (2004). Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: A reaction to our perfectionism. (BA Psychology thesis), University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
  16. * Sirois F. M. & Bean M. (2016). Rumination and health behaviours: A self–regulation resource perspective. Paper presented at the 30th conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Aberdeen, Scotland.
  17. Sirois F. M., 2014, Health Psychology
  18. Sirois F. M. & Stout D. (2011). When knowing better doesn't mean doing better: Understanding the roles of procrastination and self–blame in the health and well–being of nurses. Paper presented at the 7th Biennial Conference on Procrastination, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  19. Steel P., 2010, Procrastination and the perfectionism myth: Does perfectionism cause procrastination?
  20. Taylor S. E., 2014, Health psychology
  21. * Tosti N. (2010). Day dreamer or skilled thinker: Exploring personality, mindfulness, and well–being. (BA Psychology thesis), University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
  22. * Towers A. J. (2000). Student procrastination: A clarification and longitudinal analysis of it's relationship to perfectionism, locus of control, and stress in university students. (MA Psychology thesis), Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sirois, F. M., Molnar, D. S., & Hirsch, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sirois, Fuschia M.
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2017-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
137-159
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W2598903962
Cited by
108
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
procrastination, perfectionism, perfectionistic concerns, perfectionistic strivings, trait procrastination, self-regulation theory, multidimensional perfectionism, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review