CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionEthics and Social Impacts of AILaw, Rights, and Freedoms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy

Open access
Floridi, Luciano·2006·Ethics and Information Technology
DOI 10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ariáes P., Duby. G. (1987) A History of Private Life 5 vols. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, London
  2. L. Floridi, Information Ethics. In Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, editors, Moral Philosophy and Information Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, forthcoming
  3. Johnson D.G. (2001) Computer Ethics, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 160

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
ORCID
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-10-25
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
109-119
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
DOI
10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3
OpenAlex
W2090444554
Cited by
160
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
informational privacy, information ethics, individualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review