From individual to group privacy in big data analytics
Open accessAbstract
Mature information societies are characterised by mass production of data that provide insight into human behaviour. Analytics (as in big data analytics ) has arisen as a practice to make sense of the data trails generated through interactions with networked devices, platforms and organisations. Persistent knowledge describing the behaviours and characteristics of people can be constructed over time, linking individuals into groups or classes of interest to the platform. Analytics allows for a new type of algorithmically assembled group to be formed that does not necessarily align with classes or attributes already protected by privacy and anti-discrimination law or addressed in fairness- and discrimination-aware analytics. Individuals are linked according to offline identifiers (e.g. age, ethnicity, geographical location) and shared behavioural identity tokens, allowing for predictions and decisions to be taken at a group rather than individual level. This article examines the ethical significance of such ad hoc groups in analytics and argues that the privacy interests of algorithmically assembled groups in inviolate personality must be recognised alongside individual privacy rights. Algorithmically grouped individuals have a collective interest in the creation of information about the group, and actions taken on its behalf. Group privacy is proposed as a third interest to balance alongside individual privacy and social, commercial and epistemic benefits when assessing the ethical acceptability of analytics platforms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The American Journal of Human Genetics
S., J. (1950) · Population · doi:10.2307/1523704 · Cited by 5,124 · see citing works
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890) · University of Washington Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780295803661-014 · Cited by 4,092 · see citing works
The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716679679 · Cited by 3,432 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Auditing functions built into analytics systems may go some way to solving this problem by allowing for ex post detection of violations through examination of the inputs and decision-making rules resulting in a problematic decision (cf. Sandvig et al. 2014; Zarsky 2016; Mittelstadt et al. 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHow the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Data analytics has arisen to make sense of the data trails generated through interactions with networked devices, platforms and organisations (Burrell 2016; Grindrod 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialBarocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048 · see citing works
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001 · Cited by 1,344 · see citing works
Collective and Corporate Responsibility
French, P. A. (1984) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/fren90672 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
The ethics of big data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts
Mittelstadt, B. D., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Self-citationFloridi, L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific?
Altman, I. (1977) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01883.x · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.02.001 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Building Classifiers with Independency Constraints
Calders, T., Kamiran, F., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2009.83 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Zarsky, T. (2016) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915605575 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness
Ananny, M. (2016) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915606523 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
The Method of Levels of Abstraction
Floridi, L. (2008) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9113-7 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care
Cohen, I. G., Amarasingham, R., Shah, A., Xie, B., & Lo, B. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0048 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Lupton, D. A. (2014) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12109 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Romei, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2014) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888913000039 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge
Floridi, L. (2012) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Leese, M. (2014) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010614544204 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective
Rubel, A., & Jones, K. M. L. (2014) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2016.1130502 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Taylor, L., Floridi, L., & van der Sloot, B. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46608-8 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Open Data, Data Protection, and Group Privacy
Floridi, L. (2014) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0157-8 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The Informational Nature of Personal Identity
Floridi, L. (2011) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-011-9259-6 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Defining Profiling: A New Type of Knowledge?
Hildebrandt, M. (2008) · Profiling the European Citizen · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7_2 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
The limits of privacy in automated profiling and data mining
Schermer, B. W. (2011) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2010.11.009 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy
Floridi, L. (2006) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Wellman, C. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195095005.001.0001 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
All That Glitters is Not Gold: Digging Beneath the Surface of Data Mining
Danna, A., & Gandy, O. H. (2002) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1020845814009 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Genetic discrimination and the law.
Natowicz, M. R., Alper, J. K., & Alper, J. S. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 113 · see citing works
KDD: The challenge to individualism
Vedder, A. (1999) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1010016102284 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Mature Information Societies—a Matter of Expectations
Floridi, L. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0214-6 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Big Data| Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology | Special Section Introduction
Crawford, K., Gray, M. L., & Miltner, K. M. (2014) · International journal of communication · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Unblinking eyes: The ethics of automating surveillance
Macnish, K. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Interpretability in Machine Learning – Principles and Practice
Lisboa, P. J. G. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03200-9_2 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Disparate Impact under Title VII: An Objective Theory of Discrimination
Rutherglen, G. A. (1987) · Virginia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1072940 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Who Needs Stories if You Can Get the Data? ISPs in the Era of Big Number Crunching
Hildebrandt, M. (2011) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0041-8 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Hiring by Algorithm: Predicting and Preventing Disparate ImpactPreprint
Ajunwa, I., Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Fobe, M. (1978) · The Military Law and the Law of War Review · doi:10.4337/mllwr.1978.04.24 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Mathematical Underpinnings of Analytics: Theory and Applications
Grindrod, P. (2015) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The Concept of Group Rights in International Law
Bisaz, C. (2012) · Brill | Nijhoff eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004228719 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Group Privacy: The Right To Huddle
Bloustein, E. J. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351319966-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mathematical Underpinnings of Analytics
Grindrod, P. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725091.001.0001 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Laurie, G. T., Stevens, L., Dobbs, C., et al. (2014) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Privacy in the Post-NSA Era: Time for a Fundamental Revision?Preprint
van der Sloot, B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Barocas, Solon. 2014. Data mining and the discourse on discrimination. https://dataethics.github. io/proceedings/DataMiningandtheDiscourseOnDiscrimination.pdf.
- Floridi, Luciano. 2013b. The philosophy of information. Reprint edition. OUP Oxford. Oxford.
- Floridi, Luciano. 2016a. Three problems with group privacy and their solutions. In Group privacy: new challenges of data technologies. Vol. forthcoming. Philosophical Studies. New York: Springer.
- Harcourt, Bernard E.. 2006. Against prediction: profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. University of Chicago Press. http://bibliovault.org/BV.landing.epl?ISBN=9780226316147.
- Kamiran, Faisal, and Toon Calders. 2010. Classification with no discrimination by preferential sampling. In Proc. 19th Machine Learning Conf. Belgium and The Netherlands. http://wwwis.win.tue. nl/~tcalders/pubs/benelearn2010.
- Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Harlan, Y. (2016). Accountable algorithms. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2765268. Rochester: Social Science Research Network http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2765268.
- Laurie, Graeme, Kerina H. Jones, Leslie Stevens, and Christine Dobbs. 2014. A review of evidence relating to harm resulting from uses of health and biomedical data. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/FINAL-Report-on-Harms-Arising-from-Use-of-Health- and-Biomedical-Data-30-JUNE-2014.pdf.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. SSRN scholarly paper ID 534622. Rochester: Social Science Research Network http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=534622.
- Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wellman, C. (1995). Real rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Zarsky, Tal. 2013. Transparent predictions. University of Illinois Law Review 2013 (4). http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2324240.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms that remember: model inversion attacks and data protection law
Veale, M., Binns, R., & Edwards, L. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0083 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
A high-level overview of AI ethics
Kazim, E., & Koshiyama, A. S. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100314 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Wachter, S. (2018) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2018.02.002 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
McStay, A. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720904386 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda
Trocin, C., Mikalef, P., Papamitsiou, Z., & Conboy, K. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10146-4 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Beyond the individual: Governing AI’s societal harm
Smuha, N. A. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.3.1574 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Marelli, L., Lievevrouw, E., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724929 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Wang, C., Zhang, J., Lassi, N., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10101878 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Mühlhoff, R. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231166886 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Epistemic fragmentation poses a threat to the governance of online targeting
Milano, S., Mittelstadt, B., Wachter, S., & Russell, C. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00358-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mittelstadt, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mittelstadt, Brent
- ORCID
- Mittelstadt, Brent
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2017-02-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-494
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2587401662
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 28.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (PETRAS IoT Hub)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- group privacy, personal privacy, big data analytics, behavioral profiling, collective interests, right to privacy, data-driven decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
