Cited by 141Philosophical Ethics and TheoryEthics and Social Impacts of AIAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles

Leben, Derek·2017·Ethics and Information Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-017-9419-3

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leben, D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (US)
Corresponding author
Leben, Derek
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2017-03-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
107-115
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
OpenAlex
W2593875122
Cited by
141
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
67.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, trolley problem, original position, utilitarianism, survival probability, self-interested agents, fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review