The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This algorithm mainly relies on Maximin procedure, a strategy of maximizing the minimum payoffs.”
From Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study (2023) · cites this paper as Leben (2017)
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, this approach also received criticism about inequitable distribution of risks (Leben, 2017; Keeling, 2018).”
From Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study (2023) · cites this paper as Leben, 2017
In the citing paper
“However, this approach met with significant criticism about prioritizing the lives of passengers over other vulnerable road users, such as children (Leben, 2017, p. 99).”
From Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study (2023) · cites this paper as Leben, 2017, p. 99
In the citing paper
“Mercedes-Benz, for instance, has remarked that their AVs would prioritize safeguarding the car’s passengers in collision situations (Leben, 2017, pp. 98–99).”
From Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study (2023) · cites this paper as Leben, 2017, pp. 98–99
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Gauthier, D. (1987) · doi:10.1093/0198249926.001.0001 · Cited by 1,933
The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure
Skyrms, B. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165228 · Cited by 1,539
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles
Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654 · Cited by 1,527
Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4493 · Cited by 799
Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0844 · Cited by 790
Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 · Cited by 711
Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory
Harsanyi, J. C. (1975) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959090 · Cited by 653
Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations
Sassi, F. (2006) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czl018 · Cited by 574
Binmore, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178111.001.0001 · Cited by 472
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Anderson, M., Anderson, S. L., & Armen, C. (2004). Towards machine ethics. AAAI-04 Workship on Agent Orientations: theory and practice.
- Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. New York: Penguin Books.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract
Rahwan, I. (2018) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9430-8 · Cited by 553
Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry
Martinho, A. M., Herber, N., Kroesen, M., & Chorus, C. G. (2021) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2020.1862355 · Cited by 178
Autonomous Driving Ethics: from Trolley Problem to Ethics of Risk
Geisslinger, M., Poszler, F., Betz, J., Lütge, C., & Lienkamp, M. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00449-4 · Cited by 134
The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law
Contissa, G., Lagioia, F., & Giovanni Sartor, B. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9211-z · Cited by 124
Arnold, M. H. (2021) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-020-10080-1 · Cited by 121
Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles
Keeling, G. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1 · Cited by 98
The ethics of crashes with self‐driving cars: A roadmap, I
Nyholm, S. R. (2018) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12507 · Cited by 109
The ethics of crashes with self‐driving cars: A roadmap, II
Nyholm, S. (2018) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12506 · Cited by 85
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project
Evans, K., de Moura, N., Chauvier, S., Chatila, R., & Dogan, E. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8 · Cited by 82
Qian, L., Yin, J., Huang, Y., & Liang, Y. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122267 · Cited by 84
Umbrello, S., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00790-w · Cited by 62
Community-in-the-loop: towards pluralistic value creation in AI, or—why AI needs business ethics
Häußermann, J. J., & Lütge, C. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00047-2 · Cited by 64
From Deep Learning to Rational Machines
Buckner, C. J. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197653302.001.0001 · Cited by 57
Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city
Kaßens-Noor, E., Dake, D., Decaminada, T., Kotval-K, Z., Qu, T., Wilson, M. I., & Pentland, B. T. (2020) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.022 · Cited by 49
Virtuous vs. utilitarian artificial moral agents
Bauer, W. A. (2018) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0871-3 · Cited by 42
Poszler, F., Geisslinger, M., Betz, J., & Lütge, C. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102350 · Cited by 40
Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles
Dubljević, V. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00242-0 · Cited by 38
Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment
Zhi‐Xuan, T., Carroll, M., Franklin, M., & Ashton, H. (2024) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02249-w · Cited by 82
Safety requirements vs. crashing ethically: what matters most for policies on autonomous vehicles
Lundgren, B. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00964-6 · Cited by 37
Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Westerstrand, S. (2024) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y · Cited by 40
From machine ethics to computational ethics
Segun, S. T. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01010-1 · Cited by 35
Ethical decision making for autonomous vehicles
de Moura, N., Chatila, R., Evans, K., Chauvier, S., & Dogan, E. (2020) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv47402.2020.9304618 · Cited by 29
Autonomous Vehicles and Moral Judgments under Risk
Krügel, S., & Uhl, M. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.016 · Cited by 29
Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles
Keeling, G., Evans, K., Thornton, S. M., Mecacci, G., & de Sio, F. S. (2019) · Lecture notes in mobility · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22933-7_6 · Cited by 27
AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES)
Critch, A., & Krueger, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04948 · Cited by 25
Legal Necessity, Pareto Efficiency & Justified Killing in Autonomous Vehicle Collisions
Keeling, G. (2018) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9887-5 · Cited by 24
Against Leben’s Rawlsian collision algorithm for autonomous vehicles
Keeling, G. (2018) · Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_29 · Cited by 24
Distributive justice as an ethical principle for autonomous vehicle behavior beyond hazard scenarios
Dietrich, M., & Weisswange, T. H. (2019) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-019-09504-3 · Cited by 23
Ethical issues concerning automated vehicles and their implications for transport
Doğan, E., Costantini, F., & Boënnec, R. L. (2020) · Advances in transport policy and planning · doi:10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.05.003 · Cited by 25
A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles
Resnik, D. B., & Andrews, S. L. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00277-6 · Cited by 20
Emerging Urban Mobility Technologies through the Lens of Everyday Urban Aesthetics
Mladenović, M. N., Lehtinen, S., Soh, E., & Martens, K. (2019) · Essays in Philosophy · doi:10.7710/1526-0569.1633 · Cited by 19
Rawls’s Original Position and Algorithmic Fairness
Franke, U. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00488-x · Cited by 20
The Relativistic Car: Applying Metaethics to the Debate about Self-Driving Vehicles
Pölzler, T. (2021) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-021-10190-8 · Cited by 16
An Extension of Asimov's Robotics Laws
Nagler, J., van den Hoven, J., & Helbing, D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90869-4_5 · Cited by 20
Of trolleys and self-driving cars: What machine ethicists can and cannot learn from trolleyology
Königs, P. (2022) · Utilitas · doi:10.1017/s0953820822000395 · Cited by 14
Is tomorrow’s car appealing today? Ethical issues and user attitudes beyond automation
Vrščaj, D., Nyholm, S. R., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00941-z · Cited by 17
Enacting Responsible AI: A Configurational Analysis of AI Principles in Practice
Akbarighatar, P., Pappas, I. O., Purao, S., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10618-x · Cited by 15
Fairness in AI systems development: EU AI Act compliance and beyond
Westerstrand, S. (2025) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107864 · Cited by 14
Autonomous Driving and Public Reason: a Rawlsian Approach
Brändle, C., & Schmidt, M. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00468-1 · Cited by 13
Addressing inequal risk exposure in the development of automated vehicles
Dietrich, M. (2021) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-021-09610-1 · Cited by 12
Approaching the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles with a general social welfare function
Ebina, T., & Kinjo, K. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104390 · Cited by 12
Jiang, L., Xie, Y., & Evans, N. G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283649 · Cited by 12
Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study
Sui, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1229245 · Cited by 10
“Mercedes-Benz, for instance, has remarked that their AVs would prioritize safeguarding the car’s passengers in collision situations (Leben, 2017, pp. 98–99).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAchieving Ethical Algorithmic Behaviour in the Internet of Things: A Review
Loke, S. W. (2021) · IoT · doi:10.3390/iot2030021 · Cited by 10
Ethical machine decisions and the input-selection problem
Lundgren, B. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03296-0 · Cited by 10
Altay, B. C., Boztas, A. E., Okumuş, A., Gül, M., & Çelik, E. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118916 · Cited by 10
Moral disagreement and artificial intelligence
Robinson, P. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01697-y · Cited by 10
A practical role-based approach for autonomous vehicle moral dilemmas
Etienne, H. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221123305 · Cited by 10
Beyond Categories: A Flow-Oriented Approach To Social Justice on Online Labor Platforms
Baygi, S. R. M., Introna, L. D., & Ostovar, M. (2024) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/18253 · Cited by 9
Safety criticism and ethical dilemma of autonomous vehicles
Li, W., Huang, Y., Wang, S., & Xu, X. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00128-2 · Cited by 9
Chance as a value for artificial intelligence
Grinbaum, A. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495032 · Cited by 9
Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice
Esteban, E. G., Feenstra, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33177-0 · Cited by 8
Xu, Z., Sengar, N., Chen, T., Chung, H., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó. (2025) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101039 · Cited by 11
Millan-Blanquel, L., Veres, S. M., & Purshouse, R. C. (2020) · Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) · doi:10.1109/med48518.2020.9183263 · Cited by 8
Autonomous Vehicles and the Basic Structure of Society
Dubljević, V., & Bauer, W. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197639191.003.0018 · Cited by 8
“Choose for No Choose”—Random-Selecting Option for the Trolley Problem in Autonomous Driving
Zhao, L., & Li, W. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5682-1_48 · Cited by 8
Taking ethics seriously in AV trajectory planning algorithms
Kirchmair, L., & Paulo, N. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00706-5 · Cited by 7
Moral decision making: Explainable insights into the role of working memory in autonomous driving
Singh, A., Murzello, Y., Lee, H., Abdalla, S., & Samuel, S. (2024) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100599 · Cited by 7
JURI SAYS: An Automatic Judgement Prediction System for the European Court of Human Rights
Medvedeva, M., Xu, X., Wieling, M. B., & Vols, M. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200883 · Cited by 10
RAWLSNET: Altering Bayesian Networks to Encode Rawlsian Fair Equality of Opportunity
Liu, D., Shafi, Z., Fleisher, W., Eliassi‐Rad, T., & Alfeld, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462618 · Cited by 7
The Ethics of Automated Vehicles
Keeling, G. (2020) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.28316.10889 · Cited by 7
Classification of Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Driving: Efficacy of Boosting Procedures
Singh, A., Murzello, Y., Pokhrel, S., & Samuel, S. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15090562 · Cited by 7
Zhan, H. K., & Wan, D. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15090404 · Cited by 7
Moral Disagreement and Artificial Intelligence
Robinson, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462534 · Cited by 6
Ethics and Development of Advanced Technology Systems in Public Administration
Alexandre, A. D. C., & Pereira, L. M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33177-0_14 · Cited by 7
Applying AVWEWM to ethical decision-making during autonomous vehicle crashes
Liu, G., Luo, Y., & Sheng, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54363-8 · Cited by 6
Ethics in the Driver's Seat: Unravelling the Ethical Dilemmas of AI in Autonomous Driving
Wani, A., Kumari, D., & Singh, J. (2024) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2024-01-2023 · Cited by 10
Zhou, Z., & Zhu, L. (2023) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.06.011 · Cited by 5
Singh, A., Murzello, Y., Pokhrel, S., & Samuel, S. (2025) · Decision Analytics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100548 · Cited by 5
Schäffner, V. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie · doi:10.1007/s42048-020-00061-9 · Cited by 5
Lim, A., & Pan, E. (2021) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100011 · Cited by 8
Cowley, B. U., Charles, D. K., Pfuhl, G., & Rusanen, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09687-7_18 · Cited by 5
Unavoidable Collisions. The Automation of Moral Judgment
Fossa, F. (2023) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22982-4_4 · Cited by 5
What should AI see? Using the public’s opinion to determine the perception of an AI
Chan, R., Dardashti, R., Osinski, M., Rottmann, M., Brüggemann, D., Rücker, C., Schlicht, P., Hüger, F., Rummel, N., & Gottschalk, H. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00248-3 · Cited by 4
Computational Approaches to Morality
Bello, P., & Malle, B. F. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108755610.036 · Cited by 5
Ethical and moral decision-making for self-driving cars based on deep reinforcement learning
Qian, Z., Guo, P., Wang, Y., & Xiao, F. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-224553 · Cited by 4
Rawlsian Algorithmic Fairness and a Missing Aggregation Property of the Difference Principle
Franke, U. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00779-z · Cited by 5
Moral Dilemmas in the A.I. Era: A New Approach
Sommaggio, P., & Marchiori, S. (2020) · Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) · doi:10.14658/pupj-jelt-2020-1-5 · Cited by 4
Expanding Nallur's Landscape of Machine Implemented Ethics
Bauer, W. A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00237-x · Cited by 4
Advance Car-Crash Planning: Shared Decision Making between Humans and Autonomous Vehicles
Shaw, D., & Schneble, C. O. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00358-x · Cited by 4
Autonomous Vehicles, Business Ethics, and Risk Distribution in Hybrid Traffic
Berkey, B. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197639191.003.0013 · Cited by 4
Schäffner, V. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00591-7 · Cited by 4
Social Contracts for Non-Cooperative Games
Davoust, A., & Rovatsos, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375829 · Cited by 5
Autonomous Driving Ethics Case Study for Engineering Ethics Education
Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Li, G., Chen, F., & Zhiyuan, G. (2019) · International Conference on Modern Educational Technology (ICMET) · doi:10.1145/3341042.3341060 · Cited by 4
An ethical decision-making framework for autonomous vehicles based on public moral preferences
Yi, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, H., Shen, J., Ma, C., & Nie, B. (2025) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2025.108241 · Cited by 3
Distributive Justice, Institutionalism, and Autonomous Vehicles
Smith, P. T. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197639191.003.0017 · Cited by 3
Milford, S. R., Malgir, B. Z., Elger, B. S., & Shaw, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1544272 · Cited by 4
A Genetic Approach to the Ethical Knob
Iacca, G., Lagioia, F., Loreggia, A., & Giovanni Sartor, B. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200854 · Cited by 3
Trajectory planning for traffic safety with dynamic ethical risk adjustment
Liu, C., Hu, H., Ma, T., Zhang, Y., Jia, M., Li, L., Gan, J. Y., Qu, X., & Ran, B. (2026) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2026.108425 · Cited by 2
Moral Relevance Approach for AI Ethics
Fang, S. (2024) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies9020042 · Cited by 2
Pluralism and the Design of Autonomous Vehicles
Henschke, A., & Arora, C. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00802-3 · Cited by 2
A Confucian Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles
Sui, T., & Grève, S. S. (2024) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-024-00514-z · Cited by 2
An Ethical Decision Making Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles During an Inevitable Collision
Tang, J., Luo, X., Chen, J., Yuan, Y., & Loo, J. Y. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Risk Management (ICBAR) · doi:10.1145/3718751.3718928 · Cited by 2
Philosophical grounds for regulating the lawful operation of autonomous vehicles
Kasap, A. (2025) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600869.2025.2506312 · Cited by 2
Towards just democracies in the age of pervasive digital systems—a Rawlsian approach
Westerstrand, S. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02503-7 · Cited by 2
Public perception of ethical issues concerning automated mobility
Doğan, E., Barbier, C., & Peyrard, E. (2021) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3452853.3452877 · Cited by 3
Ethics for Times of CrisisPreprint
Nagler, J., van den Hoven, J., & Helbing, D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3112742 · Cited by 2
Perrier, E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04234 · Cited by 3
RAWLSNET: Altering Bayesian Networks to Encode Rawlsian Fair Equality of OpportunityPreprint
Liu, D., Shafi, Z., Fleisher, W., Eliassi‐Rad, T., & Alfeld, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.03909 · Cited by 2
Beyond the Veil: why Rawlsian Fairness is Too Blind
Woods, D. (2026) · Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40647-025-00457-0 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Leben, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leben, Derek
- ORCID
- Leben, Derek
- Venue
- Ethics and Information Technology
- Published
- 2017-03-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-115
- ISSN
- 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8439
- OpenAlex
- W2593875122
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 67.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, trolley problem, original position, utilitarianism, survival probability, self-interested agents, fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review