Cited by 181AI and HR TechnologiesEthics and Social Impacts of AIImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework

Bankins, Sarah·2021·Ethics and Information Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-021-09619-6

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–181 of 181

Metadata

Authors
Bankins, S.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bankins, Sarah
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2021-11-25
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
841-854
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
OpenAlex
W3216241100
Cited by
181
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 8
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, human resource management, ethical AI, decision-making framework, task-technology fit, human-AI collaboration, recruitment and selection, staff allocation, career coaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review