The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bankins (2021) in her ethical framework for AI in human resource management proposes that organizations must align actual AI use with its intended use by instructing employees on how to interact and rely on AI.”
From Check the box! How to deal with automation bias in AI-based personnel selection (2023) · cites this paper as Bankins (2021)
Citations
Cites
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774 · cited 7×
“The field generally adopts a socio-technical stance (i.e., that social and technological contexts must be examined in tandem, Selbst et al., 2019) and takes the view that AI should be developed and applied by, with, and for people to aid the betterment of humans (e.g., Floridi et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlgorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · Cited by 2,772
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8 · Cited by 1,911 · cited 1×
“Recent reviews (e.g., Floridi & Cowls, 2019; Hagendorff, 2020; Jobin et al., 2019) suggest a significant overlap exists across these approaches that supports an emerging global consensus on such ethical principles.”
BackgroundThe Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03425 · Cited by 1,907 · cited 1×
“Recent reviews (e.g., Floridi & Cowls, 2019; Hagendorff, 2020; Jobin et al., 2019) suggest a significant overlap exists across these approaches that supports an emerging global consensus on such ethical principles.”
BackgroundA Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 · Cited by 1,631 · cited 1×
“Recent reviews (e.g., Floridi & Cowls, 2019; Hagendorff, 2020; Jobin et al., 2019) suggest a significant overlap exists across these approaches that supports an emerging global consensus on such ethical principles.”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work
Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7 · Cited by 633
Self-citationREVIEWING THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AI IN DECISION MAKING PROCESSES
Osasona, F., Amoo, O. O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T. O., Farayola, O. A., & Ayinla, B. S. (2024) · International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research · doi:10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773 · Cited by 188
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Advancing Adaptive and Personalized Learning
Guettala, M., Bourekkache, S., Kazar, O., & Harous, S. (2024) · Acta Informatica Pragensia · doi:10.18267/j.aip.235 · Cited by 218
Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI’s “Eradication of Difference”
Drage, E., & Mackereth, K. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00543-1 · Cited by 148
Bujold, A., Roberge‐Maltais, I., Parent‐Rocheleau, X., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00325-1 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Bankins, S.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bankins, Sarah
- ORCID
- Bankins, Sarah
- Venue
- Ethics and Information Technology
- Published
- 2021-11-25
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 841-854
- ISSN
- 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8439
- OpenAlex
- W3216241100
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, human resource management, ethical AI, decision-making framework, task-technology fit, human-AI collaboration, recruitment and selection, staff allocation, career coaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
