The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops
Abstract
The intentional introduction into the environment or market of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is nearly always governed by a framework of science-based risk assessment and risk management measures. This is usually implemented through the integration of hazard identification and characterisation of all of the elements of risk associated with a new GM crop or derived product. Typical categories of hazards arising from the introduction of transgenic crops include: possible unintended negative health effects in a susceptible subgroup of the consumer (target) population; the evolution of resistance in the targeted pest/pathogen populations when the transgene confers resistance to a pest or pathogen; non-target hazards associated directly or indirectly with the transgenic plant or transgene product outside the plant; and those associated with the integration and subsequent expression of the transgene in a different organism or species following gene flow. The consequences of likely exposure to these and other hazards are considered in this introduction to the main issues raised when evaluating the possible risks arising from the importation or cultivation of genetically modified crops.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Bt maize transformation events that have been cultivated commercially worldwide have all gone through regulatory environmental risk assessments that concluded that no unacceptable risks for non-target organisms and biodiversity exist [2, 73, 74].”
From Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
Trumbo (2001) · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00078-5 · Cited by 4,852
Kay, H. (1980) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.33.6.608-c · Cited by 3,813
Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae
Losey, J. E., Rayor, L. S., & Carter, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20338 · Cited by 1,171
Gene Flow and Introgression from Domesticated Plants into their Wild Relatives
Ellstrand, N. C., Prentice, H. C., & Hancock, J. F. (1999) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.539 · Cited by 1,050
The release of genetically modified crops into the environment
Conner, A. J., Glare, T. R., & Nap, J. (2003) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.0960-7412.2002.001607.x · Cited by 606
Overexpression of the Bt cry2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals
Cosa, B. D., Moar, W. J., Lee, S.-B., Miller, M., & Daniell, H. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/83559 · Cited by 583
Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods
Kuiper, H. A., Kleter, G. A., Noteborn, H. P. J. M., & Kok, E. J. (2001) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01119.x · Cited by 557
Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety
Miki, B. L. A., & McHugh, S. G. (2004) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.011 · Cited by 527
Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment
Sears, M. K., Hellmich, R. L., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Oberhauser, K. S., Pleasants, J. M., Mattila, H. R., Siegfried, B. D., & Dively, G. P. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211329998 · Cited by 492
Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture
Butler, S. J., Vickery, J. A., & Norris, K. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136607 · Cited by 452
A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Cotton and Maize on Nontarget Invertebrates
Marvier, M., McCreedy, C., Regetz, J., & Kareiva, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139208 · Cited by 445
Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops
Dale, P. J., Clarke, B. R., & Fontes, E. M. G. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0602-567 · Cited by 428
Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops
Cellini, F., Chesson, A., Colquhoun, I., Constable, A., Davies, H. V., Engel, K. H., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Kärenlampi, S., Kok, E. J., Leguay, J.-J., et al. (2004) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.003 · Cited by 397
Managing the Evolution of Insect Resistance to Transgenic Plants
Alstad, D. N., & Andow, D. A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.268.5219.1894 · Cited by 395
Gene Flow from Cultivated Rice (Oryza sativa) to its Weedy and Wild Relatives
Chen, L. J. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mch006 · Cited by 357
Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops
König, A., Cockburn, A., Crevel, R., Debruyne, E., Grafstroem, R., Hammerling, U., Kimber, I., Knudsen, I., Kuiper, H. A., Peijnenburg, A., et al. (2004) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.019 · Cited by 347
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ORGANISMS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: CURRENT STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS1
Snow, A. A., Andow, D. A., Gepts, P., Hallerman, E. M., Power, A. G., Tiedje, J. M., & Wolfenbarger, L. L. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-0539 · Cited by 337
Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants
Andow, D. A., & Zwahlen, C. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00846.x · Cited by 327
Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow
Ellstrand, N. C. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1299 · Cited by 315
Warwick, S. I., Légère, A., Simard, M., & James, T. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03567.x · Cited by 298
Hall, L. M., Topinka, K. C., Huffman, J. W., Davis, L., & Good, A. G. (2000) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0688:pfbhrb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 283
Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis - purified proteins and pollen
Hellmich, R. L., Siegfried, B. D., Sears, M. K., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Daniels, M. J., Mattila, H. R., Spencer, T., Bidne, K. G., & Lewis, L. C. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211297698 · Cited by 273
Transgenic crops in natural habitats
Crawley, M. J., Brown, S. L., Hails, R. S., Kohn, D. D., & Rees, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35055621 · Cited by 252
Gene Flow from Genetically Modified Rice and Its Environmental Consequences
Lu, B., & Snow, A. A. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0669:gffgmr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 238
Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen
Oberhauser, K. S., Prysby, M., Mattila, H. R., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Sears, M. K., Dively, G. P., Olson, E. R., Pleasants, J. M., Lam, W.-K. F., & Hellmich, R. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211234298 · Cited by 234
Breakthrough in chloroplast genetic engineering of agronomically important crops
Daniell, H., Kumar, S. B., & Dufourmantel, N. (2005) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.008 · Cited by 231
Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants
Downey, R. K. (2003) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.4470 · Cited by 226
Corn pollen deposition on milkweeds in and near cornfields
Pleasants, J. M., Hellmich, R. L., Dively, G. P., Sears, M. K., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Mattila, H. R., Foster, J. E., Clark, P., & Jones, G. D. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211287498 · Cited by 224
Impact of Genetically Modified Crops on Soil‐ and Plant‐Associated Microbial Communities
Dunfield, K. E., & Germida, J. J. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0806 · Cited by 214
Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies
Stanley-Horn, D. E., Dively, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., Mattila, H. R., Sears, M. K., Rose, R., Jesse, L. C. H., Losey, J. E., Obrycki, J. J., & Lewis, L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211277798 · Cited by 196
Hérouet-Guicheney, C., Esdaile, D. J., Mallyon, B. A., Debruyne, E., Schulz, A., Currier, T. C., Hendrickx, K., van der Klis, R.-J., & Rouan, D. (2005) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.11.002 · Cited by 191
Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract
Netherwood, T., Martín-Orúe, S. M., O’Donnell, A. G., Gockling, S., Graham, J. B., Mathers, J. C., & Gilbert, H. J. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt934 · Cited by 188
Safety considerations of DNA in food
Jonas, D. A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.-H., Heller, K. J., Kozianowski, G., König, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J. F., Wackernagel, W., & Kleiner, J. (2001) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000046734 · Cited by 187
Horizontal gene transfer as a biosafety issue: A natural phenomenon of public concern
Dröge, M., Pühler, A., & Selbitschka, W. (1998) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1656(98)00105-9 · Cited by 181
Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild speciesOryza rufipogonunder experimental field conditions
Song, Z., Lu, B., Zhu, Y. G., & Chen, J. K. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00699.x · Cited by 181
Hybridization Between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a National Scale in the United Kingdom
Wilkinson, M. J., Elliott, L. J., Allainguillaume, J., Shaw, M. W., Norris, C. E., Welters, R., Alexander, M., Sweet, J., & Mason, D. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088200 · Cited by 173
Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops
Kok, E. J., & Kuiper, H. A. (2003) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.08.003 · Cited by 168
Fitt, G. P., Mares, C. L., & Llewellyn, D. J. (1994) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583159409355367 · Cited by 165
Sanvido, O., Romeis, J., & Bigler, F. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/10_2007_048 · Cited by 165
Zangerl, A. R., McKenna, D. D., Wraight, C. L., Carroll, M. J., Ficarello, P., Warner, R., & Berenbaum, M. R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.171315698 · Cited by 164
The mutational consequences of plant transformation
Latham, J. R., Wilson, A. K., & Steinbrecher, R. A. (2006) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/jbb/2006/25376 · Cited by 155
Pollen competition between cultivated and wild rice species (Oryza sativaandO. rufipogon)
Song, Z., Lu, B., Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00319.x · Cited by 152
Genetic diversity in the northernmost Oryza rufipogon populations estimated by SSR markers
Song, Z. P., Xu, X. C., Wang, B., Chen, J. K., & Lu, B. ‐. (2003) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1380-3 · Cited by 148
New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture
Messéan, A., Angevin, F., Gómez‐Barbero, M., Menrad, K., & Rodríguez‐Cerezo, E. (2006) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 147
Andersson, C., Bartsch, D. K., Buhk, H.-J., Davies, H. V., Loose, M. D., Gasson, M. J., Hendriksen, N. B., Hill, C., Kärenlampi, S. O., Kryspin-Sørensen, I., et al. (2004) · Cited by 145
Ramessar, K., Peremartí, A., Gómez‐Galera, S., Naqvi, S., Moralejo, M., Muñoz, P., Capell, T., & Christou, P. (2007) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9083-1 · Cited by 142
Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods. Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects
Skovgaard, N. (2005) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.01.004 · Cited by 140
Nielsen, K. M., van Elsas, J. D., & Smalla, K. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.3.1237-1242.2000 · Cited by 133
den Eede, G. V., Aarts, H. J. M., Buhk, H.-J., Corthier, G., Flint, H. J., Hammes, W. P., Jacobsen, B., Midtvedt, T., van der Vossen, J., von Wright, A., et al. (2004) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.001 · Cited by 130
Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock?
Wilkinson, M. J., Sweet, J., & Poppy, G. M. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00057-8 · Cited by 125
Quantification of transgenic plant marker gene persistence in the field
Widmer, F., Seidler, R. J., Donegan, K. K., & Reed, G. L. (1997) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00145.x · Cited by 121
Faria, C. A., WÄCKERS, F. L., Pritchard, J., Barrett, D. A., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000600 · Cited by 120
Stress and domestication traits increase the relative fitness of crop–wild hybrids in sunflower
Mercer, K. L., Andow, D. A., Wyse, D. L., & Shaw, R. G. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01029.x · Cited by 118
How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis?
JOHNSON, K., Raybould, A. F., HUDSON, M., & Poppy, G. M. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.11.004 · Cited by 116
Why Is Golden Rice Golden (Yellow) Instead of Red?
Schaub, P., Al‐Babili, S., Drake, R., & Beyer, P. (2005) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.104.057927 · Cited by 116
Monitoring and management strategy for Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bt cotton in China
Wu, K. (2007) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.012 · Cited by 115
Wilkinson, M. J., Davenport, I. J., Charters, Y. M., Jones, A. M. E., Allainguillaume, J., Butler, H. T., Mason, D. C., & Raybould, A. F. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00986.x · Cited by 112
Rodrigo-Simón, A., de Maagd, R. A., Avilla, C., Bakker, P. L., Molthoff, J. W., González-Zamora, J. E., & Ferré, J. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.72.2.1595-1603.2006 · Cited by 106
Torres, J. B., & Ruberson, J. R. (2007) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9109-8 · Cited by 105
Monitoring the escape of transgenic oilseed rape around Japanese ports and roadsides
Saji, H., Nakajima, N., Aono, M., Tamaoki, M., Kubo, A., Wakiyama, S., Hatase, Y., & Nagatsu, M. (2005) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2006003 · Cited by 105
Flachowsky, G., Aulrich, K., Böhme, H., & Halle, I. (2006) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.002 · Cited by 102
Adamczyk, J. J., & Sumerford, D. V. (2001) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1673/031.001.1301 · Cited by 101
Goldstein, D. A., Tinland, B., Gilbertson, L. A., Staub, J. M., Bannon, G. A., Goodman, R. E., McCoy, R. L., & Silvanovich, A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02595.x · Cited by 101
Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?
Rischer, H., & Oksman‐Caldentey, K. (2006) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.009 · Cited by 97
Bennett, P. M. (2004) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh087 · Cited by 96
The Value of Short Amino Acid Sequence Matches for Prediction of Protein Allergenicity
Silvanovich, A., Nemeth, M. A., Song, P., Herman, R. A., Tagliani, L. A., & Bannon, G. A. (2005) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj068 · Cited by 93
de Vries, J., Heine, M., Harms, K., & Wackernagel, W. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.8.4455-4462.2003 · Cited by 91
Viitanen, P. V., Devine, A. L., Khan, M. S., Deuel, D. L., Dyk, D. E. V., & Daniell, H. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.104.050054 · Cited by 90
Hill, R. A., & Sendashonga, C. (2003) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2003004 · Cited by 90
Transgenic Plants and Biosafety: Science, Misconceptions and Public Perceptions
Stewart, C. N., Richards, H. A., & Halfhill, M. D. (2000) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/00294bi01 · Cited by 86
Clinical and laboratory investigation of allergy to genetically modified foods.
Bernstein, J. A., Bernstein, I., Bucchini, L., Goldman, L., Hamilton, R. G., Lehrer, S., Rubin, C., & Sampson, H. A. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.5811 · Cited by 86
Monitoring the presence and expression of transgenes in living plants
Stewart, C. N. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.06.003 · Cited by 79
Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects
Haslberger, A. G. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0703-739 · Cited by 78
Pollen flow of cultivated rice measured under experimental conditions
Song, Z., Lu, B., & Chen, J. (2003) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000009491.24573.1d · Cited by 73
Alexander, T. W., Reuter, T., Aulrich, K., Sharma, R., Okine, E. K., Dixon, W. T., & McAllister, T. A. (2006) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.003 · Cited by 71
Chassy, B. M., Hlywka, J. J., Kleter, G. A., Kok, E. J., Kuiper, H. A., McGloughlin, M. N., Munro, I. C., Phipps, R. H., Reid, J. E., Stein, J., et al. (2008) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00029_1.x · Cited by 70
Genetically modified plants for food use and human health - an update
Smith, J. W., Brunner, E. J., Fearon, D., Holmes, E. A., Jackson, A. L., Leaver, C. J., Meade, T. L., Mills, E. N. C., Sherratt, D., Walker, D. J., et al. (2002) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 63
Are GM and conventionally bred cereals really different?
Shewry, P. R., Baudo, M., Lovegrove, A., Powers, S. J., Napier, J. A., Ward, J. L., Baker, J. M., & Beale, M. H. (2007) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.12.010 · Cited by 62
Foreign DNA in mammalian systems
Doerfler, W., Schubbert, R., Heller, H., Hertz, J., Remus, R., Schröer, J., Kämmer, C., Hilger-Eversheim, K., GERHARDT, U., Schmitz, B., et al. (1998) · Apmis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.1998.tb05650.x · Cited by 62
Bitrophic and tritrophic effects of Bt Cry3A transgenic potato on beneficial, non-target, beetles
Ferry, N., Mulligan, E. A., Majerus, M. E. N., & Gatehouse, A. M. R. (2007) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9088-9 · Cited by 59
Transgenic Crops: An Environmental Assessment
Ervin, D. E., Batie, S. S., Welsh, R., Carpentier, C. L., Fern, J. I., Richman, N. J., & Schulz, M. A. (2000) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · Cited by 54
Genetically modified sunflower release: Opportunities and risks
Cantamutto, M., & Poverene, M. (2006) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.11.007 · Cited by 53
Genetically Modified Crops and the Environment
Barton, J. E., & Dracup, M. (2000) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2000.924797x · Cited by 53
Exploring the Plant Transcriptome through Phylogenetic Profiling
Vandepoele, K., & de Peer, Y. V. (2005) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.104.054700 · Cited by 46
Can transgenic rice cause ecological risks through transgene escape?*
Lu, B., Song, Z., & Chen, J. (2003) · Progress in Natural Science Materials International · doi:10.1080/10020070312331343070 · Cited by 46
Foreign DNA in Mammalian Systems
Doerfler, W. (1999) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527613465 · Cited by 45
Raybould, A. F., & Cooper, I. (2005) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2005018 · Cited by 44
Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products
Kapuscinski, A. R. D., Goodman, R. M., Hann, S. D., Jacobs, L. R., Pullins, E. E., Johnson, C. S., Kinsey, J. D., Krall, R. L., Viña, A. G. L., Mellon, M., et al. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0603-599 · Cited by 42
Prescott, V., & Hogan, S. P. (2005) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.10.005 · Cited by 41
Rong, J., Xia, H., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, B. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01100.x · Cited by 35
Mitigation of indirect environmental effects of GM crops
Pidgeon, J. D., May, M. J., PERRY, J. N., & Poppy, G. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0401 · Cited by 34
Kleter, G. A., Peijnenburg, A., & Aarts, H. J. M. (2005) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/jbb.2005.326 · Cited by 33
Food and Agricultural Biotechnology Policy: How Much Autonomy Can Developing Countries Exercise?
Millstone, E. P., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2003) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2003.00230.x · Cited by 32
A global approach to resistance monitoring
Sivasupramaniam, S., Head, G., English, L. H., Li, Y. J., & Vaughn, T. T. (2007) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.013 · Cited by 32
Nordgård, L., Nguyen, T., Midtvedt, T., Benno, Y., Traavik, T., & Nielsen, K. M. (2007) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2007029 · Cited by 32
Food Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops
Kaeppler, H. F. (2000) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2000.924793x · Cited by 31
Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops
Firbank, L. G., Lonsdale, M., & Poppy, G. M. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1205-1475 · Cited by 29
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2006) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2006.319 · Cited by 26
Smalla, K., Borin, S., Heuer, H., Gebhard, F., van Elsas, J. D., & Nielsen, K. M. (2000) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 25
Heinemann, J. A. (2007) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · Cited by 24
Relative stability of transgene DNA fragments from GM rapeseed in mixed ruminal cultures
Sharma, R., Alexander, T. W., John, S. J., Forster, R. J., & McAllister, T. A. (2004) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20041100 · Cited by 24
Editorial. Transgene containment by molecular means - is it possible and cost effective?
Lu, B. (2003) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr/2003000 · Cited by 24
OECD (2007) · OECD Papers · doi:10.1787/oecd_papers-v7-art35-en · Cited by 24
Brinkmann, N., & Tebbe, C. C. (2007) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2007028 · Cited by 17
Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management
Dove, A. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/86623 · Cited by 16
Causes and consequences of international trade conflict over agricultural biotechnology
Bernauer, T. (2005) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2005.006442 · Cited by 16
Arpaia, S., Leo, G. M. D., Fiore, M. C., Schmidt, J. E. U., & Scardi, M. (2007) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1603/0046-225x(2007)36[213:coasai]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 15
Assessment of allergenic potential of genetically modified foods: an agenda for future research.
Selgrade, M. K., Kimber, I., Goldman, L. R., & Germolec, D. R. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.5815 · Cited by 14
Petersen, W., Umbeck, P. F., Hokanson, K. E., & Halsey, M. E. (2005) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2005016 · Cited by 13
Assessing the potential for ecological harm from gene flow to crop wild relatives.
Wilkinson, M. J., & Ford, C. S. (2007) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845930998.0287 · Cited by 13
Experience with environmental issues in GM crop production and the likely future scenarios
Gaugitsch, H. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00519-7 · Cited by 12
The effects of GMHT crops on bird abundance in arable fields in the UK
Chamberlain, D., Freeman, S. N., & Vickery, J. A. (2006) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.012 · Cited by 12
Spök, A., Hofer, H., Lehner, P., Valenta, R., Stirn, S., & Gaugitsch, H. (2004) · Cited by 12
Ray, J. L., Andersen, H. K., Young, S., Nielsen, K. M., & O’Callaghan, M. (2007) · Environmental Biosafety Research · doi:10.1051/ebr:2007032 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- European Parliament (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 106/1:0001-0039. http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/l_106/l_10620010417en00010038.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- GM Science Review Panel (2003) GM science review. First report. An open review of the science relevant to GM crops and food based on interests and concerns of the public. Submitted to the UK Government on 21 July 2003. http://www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk/report/pdf/gmsci-report1-full.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- ILSI Task Force (2004) Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. Task Force of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) International Food Biotechnology Committee. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Food Saf 3(2):35–104. http://www.members.ift.org/NR/rdonlyres/27BE106D-B616-4348-AE3A-091D0E536F40/0/crfsfsv3n2p00350104ms20040106.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- Kleter GA, Peijnenburg AACM (2006) Prediction of the potential allergenicity of novel proteins, Chapter 10. In: Gilissen LJEJ, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HFJ, Bogers RJ (eds) Allergy matters. New Approaches to Allergy Prevention and Management Series: Wageningen UR Frontis Series, vol 10, p 205. http://www.library.wur.nl/frontis/allergy_matters/10_kleter.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- Kranthi KR, Naidu S, Dhawad CS, Tatwawadi A, Mate K, Patil E, Bharose AA, Behere GT, Wadaskar RM, Kranthi S (2005) Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt-cotton and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Curr Sci 89(2):291–298
- Lehrer SB (2000) Potential health risks of genetically modified organisms: how can allergens be assessed and minimized? In: Persley GJ, Lantin MM (eds) Agricultural biotechnology, the environment and the poor. Proceedings of an International Conference, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 21–22 October 1999. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington DC, USA, 235 pp. http://www.cgiar.org/biotech/rep0100/Lehrer.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- OECD (2000c) Widening the debate on health and safety. The OECD Edinburgh Conference on the Scientific and Health Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods, 28 February–1 March 2000, Edinburgh, UK. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/30/2097312.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1996a) Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(b) delta-endotoxin and the genetic material necessary for its production in all plants; exemption from requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 61(150):40340–40343, August 2, 1996, http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1996/August/Day-02/pr-838.html. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1997a) Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki CryIA(c) and the genetic material necessary for its production in all plants; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance on all raw agricultural commodities. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 62(70):17720–17722, April 11, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1997/April/Day-11/p9376.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1997b) Coat protein of cucumber mosaic virus and the genetic material necessary for its production; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 62(163):44575–44579, August 22, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1997/August/Day-22/p22393.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1997c) Coat protein of papaya ringspot virus and the genetic material necessary for its production; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, Federal Register 62(163):44572–44575, August 22, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1997/August/Day-22/p22395.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1997d) Coat protein of potato virus Y and the genetic material necessary for its production; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 62(158):43653–43657, August 15, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1997/August/Day-15/p21690.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1997e) Coat proteins of watermelon mosaic virus-2 and zucchini yellow mosaic virus and the genetic material necessary for its production; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 62(163):44579–44582, August 22, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1997/August/Day-22/p22394.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1998b) Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies tolworthi Cry9C protein and the genetic material necessary for its production in corn; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 63(69):17687–17690, April 10, 1998. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1998/April/Day-10/p9245.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (1999b) Potato leaf roll virus resistance gene (also known as orf1/orf2 gene); exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 64(51):13078–13080, March 17, 1999. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/1999/March/Day-17/p6176.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2001a) Exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Residues of Nucleic Acids that are Part of Plant-Incorporated Protectants (Formerly Plant-Pesticides). Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 174, Federal Register 66(139):37817–37830, July 19, 2001. http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/nucleic_acid_residues.pdf. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2004a) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2; amended exemption from requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 69(62):16819–16823, March 31, 2004. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/2004/March/Day-31/p7076.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2004b) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 96(62):16809–16814, March 31, 2004. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/2004/March/Day-31/p6930.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2005e) Bacillus thuringiensis modified Cry3A Protein (mCry3A) and the genetic material necessary for its production in corn; temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA. Federal Register 70(65):17323–17327, April 6, 2005. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/2005/April/Day-06/p6499.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2005f) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins and the genetic material necessary for their production in corn; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 70(182):55254–55260, September 21, 2005. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/2005/September/Day-21/p18582.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
- USA EPA (2005g) Bacillus thuringiensis VIP3A protein and the genetic material necessary for its production; temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, Environmental Protection Agency (USA EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 40 CFR Part 180, Federal Register 70(81):21962–21966, April 28, 2005. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-PEST/2005/April/Day-28/p8530.htm. Cited 14 Dec 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings
Jouzani, G. S., Valijanian, E., & Sharafi, R. (2017) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y · Cited by 310
Hartung, F., & Schiemann, J. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12413 · Cited by 277
Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001 · Cited by 231
“Worldwide, GE plants are subject to an environmental risk assessment (ERA) before being released for cultivation (Craig et al., 2008).”
BackgroundVeresoglou, S. D., Halley, J. M., & Rillig, M. C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9862 · Cited by 228
Rethinking biorational insecticides for pest management: unintended effects and consequences
Haddi, K., Turchen, L. M., Jumbo, L. O. V., Guedes, R. N. C., Pereira, E. J. G., Aguiar, R. W. D. S., & de Oliveira, E. E. (2020) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.5837 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, W., Tepfer, M., Degrassi, G., & Ripandelli, D.
- Affiliations
- AREA Science Park (IT)
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Craig, Wendy
- Venue
- Euphytica
- Published
- 2008-01-10
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 853-880
- ISSN
- 0014-2336 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5060
- OpenAlex
- W2155336937
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Euphytica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- genetically modified crops, risk assessment, risk management, hazard identification, hazard characterization, pest resistance, gene flow, transgene integration, transgenic plants, biosafety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review