Cited by 78Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects

Haslberger, Alexander G·2003·Nature Biotechnology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt0703-739

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transgenic plant examples cited by Haslberger (2003) as illustrating unintended effects are not truly representative because they had not gone through the selection processes associated with transformation, lead event selection, and commercialization of GM crops.

    “Haslberger (2003) presents a number of transgenic plant examples claimed to illustrate such unintended effects; however, none of the cited examples are truly representative, as they had not gone through the selection processes associated with the transformation, lead event selection and commercialization of GM crops.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslberger, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Haslberger, Alexander G
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2003-07
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
739-741
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2088742796
Cited by
78
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
genetically modified foods, Codex Alimentarius, unintended consequences, food safety, biosafety assessment, regulatory guidelines, transcriptomic differences
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Consumer Product Safety, European Union, Genetic Engineering, Public Opinion, Public Policy, World Health Organization, Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Advisory Committees, Food, Genetically Modified, Government Regulation, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review