Cited by 187Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Safety considerations of DNA in food

Open access
Jonas, D.A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.-H., Heller, K.J., Kozianowski, G., König, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J.F. +2 more·2001·Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Recombinant DNA techniques are capable of introducing genetic changes into food organisms that are more predictable than those introduced through conventional breeding techniques. This review discusses whether the consumption of DNA in approved novel foods and novel food ingredients derived from genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be regarded as being as safe as the consumption of DNA in existing foods. It concludes that DNA from GMOs is equivalent to DNA from existing food organisms that has always been consumed with human diets. Any risks associated with the consumption of DNA will remain, irrespective of its origin, because the body handles all DNA in the same way. The breakdown of DNA during food processing and passage through the gastrointestinal tract reduces the likelihood that intact genes capable of encoding foreign proteins will be transferred to gut microflora. The review does not specifically address food safety issues arising from the consumption of viable genetically modified microorganisms but it shows that the likelihood of transfer and functional integration of DNA from ingested food by gut microflora and/or human cells is minimal. Information reviewed does not indicate any safety concerns associated with the ingestion of DNA per se from GMOs resulting from the use of currently available recombinant DNA techniques in the food chain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000046734

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DNA from GE crops is chemically equivalent to DNA from other sources and both are thoroughly broken down in the gastrointestinal tract during digestion.

    “The DNA from GE crops is chemically equivalent to DNA from other sources and both are thoroughly broken down in the gastrointestinal tract during digestion (Beever and Kemp, 2000; Jonas et al., 2001; CAST, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonas, D. A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.-H., Heller, K. J., Kozianowski, G., König, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J. F., Wackernagel, W., & Kleiner, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Südzucker (Germany) (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Procter & Gamble (Germany) (DE)
  • Université Bordeaux-I (FR)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Venue
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2001
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
235-254
ISSN
  • 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9697
OpenAlex
W2142655284
Cited by
187
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
genetically modified organisms, novel foods, food safety, recombinant DNA, gut microbiota, DNA transfer, food processing, gastrointestinal tract
MeSH terms
Consumer Product Safety, Digestion, DNA, Food Microbiology, Food Technology, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Food, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review