The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish
Open accessAbstract
Behaviour represents a reaction to the environment as fish perceive it and is therefore a key element of fish welfare. This review summarises the main findings on how behavioural changes have been used to assess welfare in farmed fish, using both functional and feeling-based approaches. Changes in foraging behaviour, ventilatory activity, aggression, individual and group swimming behaviour, stereotypic and abnormal behaviour have been linked with acute and chronic stressors in aquaculture and can therefore be regarded as likely indicators of poor welfare. On the contrary, measurements of exploratory behaviour, feed anticipatory activity and reward-related operant behaviour are beginning to be considered as indicators of positive emotions and welfare in fish. Despite the lack of scientific agreement about the existence of sentience in fish, the possibility that they are capable of both positive and negative emotions may contribute to the development of new strategies (e.g. environmental enrichment) to promote good welfare. Numerous studies that use behavioural indicators of welfare show that behavioural changes can be interpreted as either good or poor welfare depending on the fish species. It is therefore essential to understand the species-specific biology before drawing any conclusions in relation to welfare. In addition, different individuals within the same species may exhibit divergent coping strategies towards stressors, and what is tolerated by some individuals may be detrimental to others. Therefore, the assessment of welfare in a few individuals may not represent the average welfare of a group and vice versa. This underlines the need to develop on-farm, operational behavioural welfare indicators that can be easily used to assess not only the individual welfare but also the welfare of the whole group (e.g. spatial distribution). With the ongoing development of video technology and image processing, the on-farm surveillance of behaviour may in the near future represent a low-cost, noninvasive tool to assess the welfare of farmed fish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wendelaar Bonga, S. E. (1997) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.591 · Cited by 4,188
Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999 · cited 3×
“Physiologically, the proactive coping style is characterised by low production of corticosteroid hormones in response to stress production, but high sympathetic reactivity, while the opposite is true for the reactive coping style (Koolhaas et al. 1999; Pottinger and Carrick 2001a; Øverli et al. 2007).”
BackgroundAssessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain.
Rose, J. D. (2002) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/20026491051668 · Cited by 413
Corticotropin-Releasing Factor in Brain: A Role in Activation, Arousal, and Affect Regulation
Heinrichs, S. C., & Koob, G. F. (2004) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.103.052092 · Cited by 353
A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis
Korte, S. M., Olivier, B., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018 · Cited by 340
Stress and Dominance in a Social Fish
Fox, H. E., White, S. A., Kao, M. H. F., & Fernald, R. D. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-16-06463.1997 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Schreck, C. B., & Tort, L. (2016) · Fish Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802728-8.00001-1 · Cited by 431
Stress management in aquaculture: a review of dietary interventions
Ciji, A., & Akhtar, M. S. (2021) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12565 · Cited by 265
Lawrence, K., Sherwen, S. L., & Larsen, H. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11102979 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Martins, C. I. M., Galhardo, L., Noble, C., Damsgård, B., Spedicato, M. T., Zupa, W., Beauchaud, M., Kulczykowska, E., Massabuau, J.-C., Carter, T., Planellas, S. R., & Kristiansen, T.
- Venue
- Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
- Published
- 2011-07-28
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-41
- ISSN
- 0920-1742 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5168
- OpenAlex
- W1968467263
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10695-011-9518-8
- The paper
- Martins, C. I. M., Galhardo, L., Noble, C., Damsgård, B., Spedicato, M. T., Zupa, W., Beauchaud, M., Kulczykowska, E., Massabuau, J.-C., Carter, T., Planellas, S. R., & Kristiansen, T. (2012). Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9518-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.