Cited by 45Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Therapy and Development

Mechanisms of Behavioral and Affective Treatment Outcomes in a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Boys

Open access
Burke, Jeffrey D., Loeber, Rolf·2016·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Evidence for effective treatment for behavioral problems continues to grow, yet evidence about the effective mechanisms underlying those interventions has lagged behind. The Stop Now and Plan (SNAP) program is a multicomponent intervention for boys between 6 and 11. This study tested putative treatment mechanisms using data from 252 boys in a randomized controlled trial of SNAP versus treatment as usual. SNAP includes a 3 month group treatment period followed by individualized intervention, which persisted through the 15 month study period. Measures were administered in four waves: at baseline and at 3, 9 and 15 months after baseline. A hierarchical linear modeling strategy was used. SNAP was associated with improved problem-solving skills, prosocial behavior, emotion regulation skills, and reduced parental stress. Prosocial behavior, emotion regulation skills and reduced parental stress partially mediated improvements in child aggression. Improved emotion regulation skills partially mediated treatment-related child anxious-depressed outcomes. Improvements in parenting behaviors did not differ between treatment conditions. The results suggest that independent processes may drive affective and behavioral outcomes, with some specificity regarding the mechanisms related to differing treatment outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-015-9975-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have already suggested the empirical superiority of deploying evidence-based treatment modules or kernels to target person-specific maladaptive processes of change, over global protocols targeting global syndromes.

    “Studies have already suggested the empirical superiority of deploying evidencebased treatment modules or kernels to target person-specific maladaptive processes of change, over global protocols targeting global syndromes 118,119 .”

    From “Third-wave” cognitive and behavioral therapies and the emergence of a process-based approach to intervention in psychiatry (2021) · cites this paper as [118]

    The passage on treatment mechanisms (page unavailable) reports that CBT components aimed at problem solving and anger regulation were associated with improved outcomes in a meta-analysis. The Abstract also reports that SNAP included individualized intervention. Neither passage establishes that person-specific modules or kernels outperform global protocols targeting syndromes. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, J. D., & Loeber, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Burke, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2015-01-27
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
179-189
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2084621828
Cited by
45
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH074148, MH074148)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
therapeutic mechanisms, cognitive-behavioral intervention, boys, child aggression, emotion regulation, prosocial behavior, problem-solving skills, parental stress, anxious/depressed symptoms, parental behavior, mediation analysis, child behavior problems
MeSH terms
Formative Feedback, Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Emotions, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Role Playing, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Parenting, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review