Cited by 234Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationPersonality Traits and PsychologyStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Establishing Causality Using Longitudinal Hierarchical Linear Modeling: An Illustration Predicting Achievement From Self-Control

Open access
Duckworth, Angela Lee, Tsukayama, Eli, May, Henry·2010·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

The predictive validity of personality for important life outcomes is well established, but conventional longitudinal analyses cannot rule out the possibility that unmeasured third-variable confounds fully account for the observed relationships. Longitudinal hierarchical linear models (HLM) with time-varying covariates allow each subject to serve as his or her own control, thus eliminating between-individual confounds. HLM also allow the directionality of the causal relationship to be tested by reversing time-lagged predictor and outcome variables. We illustrate these techniques through a series of models that demonstrate that within-individual changes in self-control over time predict subsequent changes in GPA but not vice-versa. The evidence supporting a causal role for self-control was not moderated by IQ, gender, ethnicity, or income. Further analyses rule out one time-varying confound: self-esteem. The analytic approach taken in this study provides the strongest evidence to date for the causal role of self-control in determining achievement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550609359707

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Duckworth, Tsukayama and May [2010] show that changes in self-control predict subsequent changes in report card grades.

    “Likewise, Duckworth, Tsukayama and May [2010] use longitudinal hierarchical linear models to show that changes in self-control predict subsequent changes in report card grades.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Duckworth, Tsukayama and May [2010]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Almeida DM Wethington E Chandler AL 1999 Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent-child dyads Journal of Marriage and Family 61 49 61
  2. Bandura A Mischel W 1965 Modifications of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2 698 705 4158333
  3. Cohen J 1992 A power primer Psychological Bulletin 112 155 159 19565683
  4. Diamond A Barnett S Thomas J Munro S 2007 Preschool program improves cognitive control Science 318 1387 1388 18048670 PMC2174918
  5. Nunnally JC Salvendi G 1967 Psychometric theory McGraw-Hill series in psychology New York McGraw-Hill
  6. Ozer DJ Benet-Martinez V 2006 Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes Annual Review of Psychology 57 401 421 16318601
  7. Rosenberg M 1965 Society and the adolescent self-image Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
  8. Rosenthal R Rosnow RL 1991 Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis 2 New York McGraw-Hill
  9. Rueda MR Rothbart MK McCandliss BD Saccomanno L Posner MI 2005 Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 14931 14936 PMC1253585 16192352

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E., & May, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Consortium for Policy Research in Education (US)
Corresponding author
Tsukayama, Eli
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2010-08-05
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
311-317
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2121412132
Cited by
234
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG033182)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
self-control, academic performance, GPA, causal inference, time-lagged effects, within-person change, self-esteem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review