Cited by 58Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Sensitivity to Peer Feedback in Young Adolescents with Symptoms of ADHD: Examination of Neurophysiological and Self-Report Measures

Open access
Babinski, Dara E., Kujawa, Autumn, Kessel, Ellen M., Arfer, Kodi B., Klein, Daniel N.·2019·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Many youth with ADHD experience peer difficulties, but the mechanisms underlying this dysfunction remain unknown. Very little work has examined neurophysiological measures of social feedback processing in relation to ADHD symptoms. The goal of this study was to examine associations of ADHD symptoms with indicators of sensitivity to social feedback in a laboratory task and self-report of rejection sensitivity. A large community sample of 10- to 15-year-old adolescents (N = 391; M age = 12.64, 48.6% girls) participated in the study. Mothers rated youth ADHD symptoms. Youth completed the Island Getaway task, which elicits neurophysiological (i.e., event-related potentials [ERP]) measures of sensitivity to peer rejection and acceptance feedback, and also completed self-ratings of rejection sensitivity. Greater ADHD symptoms were associated with an enhanced N1 ERP component, which correlated with higher levels of self-reported rejection sensitivity. In addition, greater ADHD symptoms were associated with reduced reactivity to social acceptance, as measured by the later reward positivity ERP component. Youth with elevated ADHD symptoms exhibited enhanced sensitivity to peer rejection at the neurophysiological and self-report level, as well as reduced neurophysiological reactivity to peer acceptance. Future work including neural measures of social functioning may serve to elucidate mechanisms underlying the social dysfunction characteristic of ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-018-0470-2

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong, understanding, and accommodating social connections can significantly enhance the overall quality of life of individuals with ADHD.

    “The presence of strong, understanding, and accommodating social connections can significantly enhance their overall quality of life (Babinski et al. 2019; Eakin et al. 2004; Fuller‐Thomson et al. 2022).”

    From “I Felt Like a Burden”: An Exploration Into the Experience of Romantic Relationships for People With ADHD (2026) · cites this paper as Babinski et al. 2019

    The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says peer functioning is increasingly salient in adolescence and links peer dysfunction among adolescents with ADHD to serious negative outcomes. This supports the importance of social relationships, but the paper does not establish that strong, understanding, and accommodating connections significantly enhance overall quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McQuade JD & Hoza B (2014). Peer relationships of Children with ADHD. Barkley RA (Ed.), Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a handbook for diagnosis and treatment (pp. 210– 222). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  2. Nieminen P, Lehtiniemi H Vähäkangas K, Huusko A, & Rautio A (2013). Standardised regression coefficient as an effect size index in summarizing findings in epidemiological studies. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health, 10, 1– 15. 10.2427/8854 · DOI
  3. Pelham WE, & Bender ME (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. Gadow K & Bialer I (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 365– 436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babinski, D. E., Kujawa, A., Kessel, E. M., Arfer, K. B., & Klein, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Babinski, Dara E.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
605-617
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2888824845
Cited by
58
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH069942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, peer acceptance, event-related potentials, N1 component, reward positivity, self-report, social dysfunction, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Psychological Distance, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review