Cited by 1,884Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses

Gehring, William J., Willoughby, Adrian R.·2002·Science

Abstract

We report the observation of neural processing that occurs within 265 milliseconds after outcome stimuli that inform human participants about gains and losses in a gambling task. A negative-polarity event-related brain potential, probably generated by a medial-frontal region in or near the anterior cingulate cortex, was greater in amplitude when a participant's choice between two alternatives resulted in a loss than when it resulted in a gain. The sensitivity to losses was not simply a reflection of detecting an error; gains did not elicit the medial-frontal activity when the alternative choice would have yielded a greater gain, and losses elicited the activity even when the alternative choice would have yielded a greater loss. Choices made after losses were riskier and were associated with greater loss-related activity than choices made after gains. It follows that medial-frontal computations may contribute to mental states that participate in higher level decisions, including economic choices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1066893

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MFN is apparent from 200 to 300 ms after reward feedback, and it appears to reflect activity involved in the assessment of motivational impact.

    “The MFN is apparent from 200 to 300 ms after reward feedback, and it appears to reflect activity involved in the assessment of motivational impact (Gehring and Willoughby, 2002).”

    From Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate (2010) · cites this paper as Gehring and Willoughby, 2002

  • The behavioral impact of intertrial reward priming positively correlates with a midline anterior ERP component called medial frontal negativity, suggested to reflect assessment of motivational impact.

    “the behavioral impact of intertrial reward priming has been shown to positively correlate with a midline anterior ERP component, called medial frontal negativity, which has been suggested to reflect the assessment of motivational impact (Gehring & Willoughby, 2002; Hickey et al., 2010a).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Gehring & Willoughby, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Gehring, William J.
Venue
Science
Published
2002-03-22
Volume
295
Issue
5563
Pages
2279-2282
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2039483201
Cited by
1,884
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 87
FWCI
22.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
medial frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, monetary gains and losses, gambling, event-related potentials, loss aversion, risk-taking, economic decision-making, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Economics, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gambling, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review