Cited by 64Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

Social processing in early adolescence: associations between neurophysiological, self-report, and behavioral measures

Open access
Kujawa, Autumn, Kessel, Ellen M., Carroll, Ashley, Arfer, Kodi B., Klein, Daniel N.·2017·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Peer relationships play a major role in adolescent development, but few methods exist for measuring social processing at the neurophysiological level. This study extends our pilot study of Island Getaway, a task for eliciting event-related potentials (ERPs) to peer feedback. We differentiated ERPs using principal components analysis (PCA) and examined associations with behavioral and self-report measures in young adolescents (N=412). PCA revealed an early negativity in the ERP enhanced for rejection feedback, followed by a series of positivities (consistent with reward positivity [RewP], P300, and late positive potential) that were enhanced for acceptance feedback. Greater self-reported task engagement correlated with a larger RewP to acceptance and lower rates of rejecting peers. Youth higher in depressive symptoms exhibited a blunted RewP to social acceptance and reported lower engagement. Results highlight ERP components sensitive to peer feedback that may inform understanding of social processes relevant to typical and atypical development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.001

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent improvements in assessment at self-report, behavioral, and neurophysiological levels are beginning to offer a more detailed understanding of how social pleasure develops and goes awry.

    “Recent improvements in assessment (at self-report, behavioral, and neurophysiological levels) are beginning to offer a more detailed understanding of how social pleasure develops and goes awry (193, 194).”

    From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [194]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kessel EM Kujawa A Proudfit GH Klein DN 2015 Neural sensitivity to reward diffentiates social from generalized anxiety in children Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 56 7 792 800 25363803 PMC4667724
  2. Nelson BD Perlman G Klein DN Kotov R Hajcak G 2016 Blunted neural response to rewards prospectively predicts the development of depression in adolescent girls The American Journal of Psychiatry 173 12 1223 1230 27363510

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kujawa, A., Kessel, E. M., Carroll, A., Arfer, K. B., & Klein, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kujawa, Autumn
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
128
Pages
55-62
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734619791
Cited by
64
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH069942)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social processing, early adolescence, peer relationships, peer feedback, event-related potentials, reward positivity, P300, late positive potential, social rejection, social acceptance, task engagement, depressive symptoms, neurophysiological measures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Reward, Psychological Distance, Feedback, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review