Cited by 58Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

MMR-vaccine and regression in autism spectrum disorders: negative results presented from Japan

Uchiyama, Tokio, Kurosawa, Michiko, Inaba, Yutaka·2007·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

It has been suggested that the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) is a cause of regressive autism. As MMR was used in Japan only between 1989 and 1993, this time period affords a natural experiment to examine this hypothesis. Data on 904 patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were analyzed. During the period of MMR usage no significant difference was found in the incidence of regression between MMR-vaccinated children and non-vaccinated children. Among the proportion and incidence of regression across the three MMR-program-related periods (before, during and after MMR usage), no significant difference was found between those who had received MMR and those who had not. Moreover, the incidence of regression did not change significantly across the three periods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-006-0157-3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cohort study of Uchiyama 2007 was potentially affected by bias because participants were from a private clinic and definitions of ASD diagnosis and methods for ASD regression ascertainment were not clearly reported.

    “The cohort study of Uchiyama 2007 was potentially affected by a different type of bias, considering that the participants were from a private clinic and that definitions of applied Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD) diagnosis and of methods used for ASD regression ascertainment were not clearly reported.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Uchiyama 2007

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uchiyama, T., Kurosawa, M., & Inaba, Y.
Affiliations
  • Otsuma Women's University (JP)
  • Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Uchiyama, Tokio
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2006-07-25
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
210-217
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1991698391
Cited by
58
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
MMR vaccine, regressive autism, autism spectrum disorder, vaccine safety, natural experiment, Japan, childhood immunization
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Immunization, Japan, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review