Cited by 179Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAction Observation and Synchronization

Event Related Potentials in the Understanding of Autism Spectrum Disorders: An Analytical Review

Open access
Jeste, Shafali S., Nelson, Charles A.·2009·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

In this paper we critically review the literature on the use of event related potentials (ERPs) to elucidate the neural sources of the core deficits in autism. We review auditory and visual ERP studies, and then review the use of ERPs in the investigation of executive function. We conclude that, in autism, impairments likely exist in both low and higher level auditory and visual processing, with prominent impairments in the processing of social stimuli. We also discuss the putative neural circuitry underlying these deficits. As we look to the future, we posit that tremendous insight can be gained by applying ERPs to the definition of endophenotypes, which, in turn, can facilitate early diagnosis and the creation of informed interventions for children with autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-008-0652-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced amplitude of the frontal novelty P3 or P3a component in ASD is a largely consistent finding across multiple studies.

    “A largely consistent finding across multiple studies has been reduced amplitude of the frontal (novelty) P3 or P3a component in ASD (Jeste and Nelson, 2009).”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Jeste and Nelson, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeste, S. S., & Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Jeste, Shafali S.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2008-10-11
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
495-510
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1987602273
Cited by
179
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (AS1609)
  • Child Neurology Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, event-related potentials, auditory processing deficits, visual processing deficits, social processing, executive function, neural circuits, endophenotypes, early diagnosis, children
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Social Perception, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review