Cited by 88Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples

Open access
Mazefsky, C. A., McPartland, J. C., Gastgeb, H. Z., Minshew, N. J.·2013·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using multiple sources of information together in assessment can dramatically increase the likelihood of identifying autism.

    “which can dramatically increase the likelihood of identifying autism [27, 28].”

    From Lobbying Autism's Diagnostic Revision in the DSM-5 (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (page not provided) show that combining ADOS and ADI-R data increased the proportion with evidence across the required DSM-5 domains compared with either measure alone. But the study assessed participants who already had ASD research diagnoses; it does not establish a dramatic increase in identifying autism in assessments generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ASAN successfully encouraged language in the DSM-5 recommending that multiple sources of information be used together in assessment to identify behaviors that do not always present clinically.

    “Through our comments on confidential drafts of the diagnostic text, ASAN successfully encouraged language recommending that multiple sources of information be used together in assessment to identify behaviors that do not always present clinically, such as direct observation and interaction, interview on history, and other reports, which can dramatically increase the likelihood of identifying autis”

    From Lobbying Autism's Diagnostic Revision in the DSM-5 (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion reports that observation alone identified fewer participants meeting the proposed DSM-5 criteria than interview information did, and concludes that collateral information becomes more essential with DSM-5. It supports the value of combining information to identify symptoms missed in observation, but does not say that ASAN influenced DSM-5 wording or establish what the final diagnostic text recommended. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Le Couteur A Rutter M Lord C Rios P Robertson S Holdgrafer M McLennan JD 1989 Autism diagnostic interview: A semi-structured interview for parents and caregivers of autistic persons Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 19 3 363 387 2793783
  2. Lord C Rutter M DiLavore PC Risi S 1999 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (WPS Edition) Los Angeles Western Psychological Services
  3. Weschler D 1997 Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Third Edition San Antonio The Psycological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazefsky, C. A., McPartland, J. C., Gastgeb, H. Z., & Minshew, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Mazefsky, C. A.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-09-26
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
1236-1242
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2094507998
Cited by
88
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH086785, K23MH086785)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS033355)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD060601, P01HD035469, HD35469, U19HD035469, P50HD055748, HD 055748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, DSM-IV, high-functioning autism, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, ADI-R, diagnostic assessment instrument
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review