Cited by 191Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Testing the construct validity of proposed criteria for DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Mandy, William P.L., Charman, Tony, Skuse, David H.·2012·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To use confirmatory factor analysis to test the construct validity of the proposed DSM-5 symptom model of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in comparison to alternative models, including that described in DSM-IV-TR. Method Participants were 708 verbal children and young persons (mean age, 9.5 years) with mild to severe autistic difficulties. Autistic symptoms were measured using the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic interview (3Di). The fit of the two-factor DSM-5 model, which has a social communication and a restricted, repetitive behavior (RRB) factor, was compared with that of alternative models. In one half of the sample, properties of the DSM-5 model were examined to investigate the validity of specific diagnostic criteria, informing the development of a better fitting DSM-5 model. This was then cross-validated in the remaining "hold-out" half of the sample; and its stability was tested across groups defined by age, sex, and symptom severity. Results The DSM-5 model was superior to the three-factor DSM-IV-TR model. It was improved by the removal of items measuring "play and imagination" and "stereotyped and repetitive use of language." A scale measuring sensory abnormalities was added to the model, and loaded onto its RRB factor. This DSM-5 model fit well in the hold-out sample; was stable across age and sex; and fit adequately in those with clinical and sub-threshold autistic presentations. Conclusions Among higher-functioning individuals, ASD is a dyad,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.013

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 39 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Study design and conductcitation

    Our participants were mainly high-functioning.

    “Firstly, in line with other clinic-based 33 and epidemiological 34 samples, our participants were mainly high-functioning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [33] Fischbach, 2010, The Simons Simplex Collection: a resource for the identification of autism genetic risk factors, Neuron source
    • cites [34] Kim, 2010, Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample, Am J Psychiatry source
  • Findingcitation

    Autism is not well conceptualized as a single dimension.

    “We also confirmed previous findings that autism is not well conceptualized as a single dimension.9,11,12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] Frazier, 2008, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Autism Diagnostic Interview—revised, J Autism Dev Disord source
    • cites [11] Snow, 2009, The structure of the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised: diagnostic and phenotypic implications, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
    • cites [12] Lecavalier, 2009, Deconstructing the PDD clinical phenotype: internal validity of the DSM-IV, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
  • Findingown data

    All standardized residuals for the sensory abnormalities variable were comfortably in the range of -2 to 2.

    “all standardized residuals for this variable were comfortably in the range of Ϫ2 to 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • Findingown data

    Only the DSM-5 model had acceptable values for all indices of fit.

    “Only the DSM-5 model had acceptable values for all the indices of fit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • Findingown data

    In the estimation sample, C3 (stereotyped and repetitive use of language) appeared to be a problematic item, as its standardized residual covariance was outside the acceptable range (>2) for two other communication subscales (C1 and C4).

    “C3 appeared to be a problematic item, as its standardized residual covariance was outside the acceptable range (greater than Ϯ2) for two other communication subscales (C1 and C4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The triadic model proposed in DSM-IV-TR lacks validity, as all but one CFA study found it inferior to alternative models.

    “They are strongly suggestive that the triadic model proposed in DSM-IV-TR lacks validity, [7][8][9][10][11] as all but one study 12 found it to be inferior to alternative models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7][8][9][10][11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12] Lecavalier, 2009, Deconstructing the PDD clinical phenotype: internal validity of the DSM-IV, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source

      The CFA findings and Discussion report the opposite result for this study: the DSM-based three-factor model fit better than the one- and two-factor alternatives. The Abstract also says more research is needed before discarding the current classification system. The paper discusses mixed findings from other studies, but does not establish the claimed all-but-one pattern. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Models of autistic symptoms can vary according to participant characteristics.

    “Previous CFA findings have shown that models of autistic symptoms can vary according to participant characteristics.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Lecavalier, 2009, Deconstructing the PDD clinical phenotype: internal validity of the DSM-IV, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The factor structure of the autistic phenotype can vary with IQ such that better model fit is found in more intellectually able groups.

    “There is some evidence that the factor structure of the autistic phenotype can vary with IQ such that better model fit is found in more intellectually able groups.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Lecavalier, 2009, Deconstructing the PDD clinical phenotype: internal validity of the DSM-IV, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A scale measuring sensory abnormalities was added to the DSM-5 model and loaded onto its RRB factor, with a loading of 0.58.

    “A scale measuring sensory abnormalities was added to the model, and loaded onto its RRB factor.”
    • Also stated in: § Modifying the DSM-5 Model · plain
      “The loading of the sensory abnormalities variable onto RRB was 0.58”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    C4 (play and imagination) appeared to be misspecified, as it was highly correlated with C2 (conversational abilities), indicated by their high standardized residual covariance (2.79) and the largest reduction of the model chi2 (19.18) would be achieved by allowing their error terms to co-vary.

    “C4 (play and imagination) also appeared to be misspecified, as it was highly correlated with C2 (conversational abilities), as indicated by their high standardized residual covariance (2.79) and the fact that the largest reduction of the model 2 (19.18) would be achieved by allowing their error terms to co-vary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    S3, S4, and C1 have weaker loadings onto the social communication factor in the BAP compared with the ASD group.

    “All had weaker loadings onto the social communication factor in the BAP compared with the ASD group.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · hedged
      “However there was evidence that loadings onto the SC factor for subscales measuring sharing (S3), socio-emotional reciprocity (S4), and non-verbal communication (C1) were lower in the BAP than in ASD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Agreement between the 3Di and the ADI-R for threshold scores that comprise the ADI-R algorithm is high: 86% for reciprocal social interaction, 100% for communication and 76% for repetitive and stereotyped behaviors.

    “Agreement between the 3Di and the ADI-R for threshold scores that comprise the ADI-R algorithm is also high: 86% for reciprocal social interaction, 100% for communication and 76% for repetitive and stereotyped behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Skuse, 2004, The Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3di): a novel computerized assessment for autism spectrum disorders, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
    • cites [19] Santosh, 2009, The construction and validation of a short form of the Developmental, Diagnostic and Dimensional Interview, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Draft DSM-5 criteria propose reassignment of stereotyped and repetitive use of language as a form of RRB, not a symptom of communication impairment.

    “the reassignment of stereotyped and repetitive use of language as a form of RRB, not a symptom of communication impairment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Among higher-functioning individuals, ASD is a dyad, not a triad, with distinct social communication and repetitive behavior dimensions.

    “Among higher-functioning individuals, ASD is a dyad, not a triad, with distinct social communication and repetitive behavior dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ASD is a dimensional disorder.

    “given the strong evidence that ASD is a dimensional disorder, 13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Constantino, 2003, Autistic traits in the general population: a twin study, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Draft DSM-5 criteria propose removal of impaired imagination from the list of core autistic symptoms.

    “Furthermore draft criteria propose the removal of impaired imagination from the list of core autistic symptoms 6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Wing, 2011, Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: better or worse than the DSM-IV?, Res Dev Disabil source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The fit of the best-fitting DSM-5 model was tested in subgroups defined according to sex, age, and symptom severity to see if its structure and parameters were stable and generalizable.

    “Finally, fit of the best-fitting DSM-5 model was tested in subgroups defined according to sex, age, and symptom severity, to see if this model's structure and parameters were stable and generalizable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The 3Di has strong psychometric properties.

    “Research indicates that the 3Di has strong psychometric properties.14,19”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Skuse, 2004, The Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3di): a novel computerized assessment for autism spectrum disorders, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
    • cites [19] Santosh, 2009, The construction and validation of a short form of the Developmental, Diagnostic and Dimensional Interview, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Draft DSM-5 criteria propose inclusion of hypo- or hyperreactivity to sensory stimuli as a core criterion within the RRB domain.

    “the inclusion of hypo-or hyperreactivity to sensory stimuli as a core criterion within the RRB domain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The overall sample was randomly divided into an estimation sample (n=367) and a hold-out sample (n=341).

    “For the purpose of these model fitting procedures, the overall sample was randomly divided in two to create an “estimation sample” (n ϭ 367) and a “holdout sample” (n ϭ 341).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The sensory abnormalities scale created from five 3Di items concerning hypo- and hypersensitivity to sounds and textures had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.8.

    “For the current study, we also created a sensory abnormalities scale from five 3Di items concerning hypo-and hypersensitivity to sounds and textures.Cronbach's ␣ for this scale was 0.8.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Interrater and test-retest reliability of the 3Di are high, yielding intraclass correlations greater than 0.86.

    “Interrater and test-retest reliability of the 3Di are high, yielding intraclass correlations greater than 0.86.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Skuse, 2004, The Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3di): a novel computerized assessment for autism spectrum disorders, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
    • cites [19] Santosh, 2009, The construction and validation of a short form of the Developmental, Diagnostic and Dimensional Interview, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Current diagnostic criteria conceptualize the autism syndrome as a triad of observable impairments in social reciprocity, communication, and flexibility of thought and behavior.

    “Current diagnostic criteria conceptualize the autism syndrome as a triad of observable impairments in social reciprocity, communication, and flexibility of thought and behavior.1,2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2] 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The ASD and BAP groups did not differ according to age or intelligence, but there were a higher proportion of males among those with an ASD diagnosis.

    “These did not differ according to age or intelligence, but there were a higher proportion of males among those with an ASD diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Draft DSM-5 criteria propose replacing the autism triad with an autism dyad comprising social communication and restricted repetitive behavior (RRB) dimensions.

    “Foremost among these is the suggested replacement of the autism triad with an autism dyad comprising social communication and restricted repetitive behavior (RRB) dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CFI values above 0.9 are considered acceptable, with a CFI above 0.95 indicating good fit.

    “Values above 0.9 are considered acceptable, with a CFI above 0.95 indicating good fit.26”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Struct Equat Model source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The proposed autism dyad of DSM-5 has greater validity, with the core impairments of ASD being manifestations of separable social communication and RRB dimensions.

    “and that the proposed autism dyad of DSM-5 has greater validity, with the core impairments of ASD being manifestations of separable social communication and RRB dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    High- and low-functioning ASD may have distinct factor structures.

    “In fact there is a possibility that high-and low-functioning ASD have distinct factor structures, because those CFA studies that included a large proportion of ASD individuals with comorbid intellectual disability have tended not to endorse a two-factor DSM-5-type model, 7,8,10 be-cause they report, in addition to social communication and RRB, an”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] Boomsma, 2008, A new symptom model for autism cross-validated in an independent sample, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
    • cites [8] Van Lang, 2006, Structural equation analysis of a hypothesised symptom model in the autism spectrum, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
    • cites [10] Georgiades, 2007, Structure of the autism symptom phenotype: a proposed multidimensional model, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RMSEA values below 0.05 are considered good, and models with values above 0.1 should not be accepted.

    “Values below 0.05 are considered good, and models with values above 0.1 should not be accepted.25”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Byrne, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    SRMR values below 0.08 indicate good fit.

    “Values below 0.08 indicate good fit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Byrne, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The subscales S3, S4, and C1 are somewhat better indicators of social communication difficulties in ASD than in individuals with sub-threshold presentations.

    “One interpretation of this finding is that these subscales, which were initially designed to measure difficulties of clinical severity, are somewhat better indicators of social communication difficulties in ASD than in individuals with sub-threshold presentations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sensory abnormalities are more strongly correlated with RRB than with autistic social and communication difficulties.

    “This is consistent with findings elsewhere that sensory abnormalities are more strongly correlated with RRB than with autistic social and communication difficulties.29”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Chen, 2009, Restricted and repetitive behaviours, sensory processing and cognitive style in children with autism spectrum disorders, J Autism Dev Disord source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Distinct aetiologies may underpin different dimensions of autistic impairment.

    “and that distinct aetiologies may underpin different dimensions of autistic impairment.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Mandy, 2008, Research review: what is the association between the social-communication element of autism and repetitive interests, behaviours and activities?, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It is time to give up on a single explanation for autism.

    “Evidence is emerging that it is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Happe, 2006, Time to give up on a single explanation for autism, Nat Neurosci source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The finding that C4 is problematic is compatible with the notion that difficulties with play and imagination are relevant to an ASD diagnosis, but the key issue is the extent to which they occur socially in reciprocal exchange.

    “This finding is compatible with the notion embodied in draft DSM-5 criteria that difficulties with play and imagination are relevant to an ASD diagnosis, but that the key issue is the extent to which they can occur socially, in the context of reciprocal exchange.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study used a large, heterogeneous sample and a well-validated measurement instrument to test construct validity and factor invariance of ASD.

    “This study used a large, heterogeneous sample to test the construct validity and factor invariance of ASD using a well-validated measurement instrument.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A DSM-5 model was developed in an estimation sample and cross-validated in a holdout sample to test its generalisability.

    “A DSM-5 model was developed in an estimation sample and cross-validated in a holdout sample, to test its generalisability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The model tested approximates but is not identical to the model proposed in DSM-5 draft criteria.

    “Second, because we used subscales from the 3Di validated diagnostic algorithm, which was based on DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria, we were able to test a model that approximates, but that is not identical to, the model proposed in DSM-5 draft criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
33 of 33
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Autism is a behavioral syndrome in which a specific cluster of signs and symptoms signifies a latent disease entity.

    “autism is defined as a behavioral syndrome, such that a specific cluster of signs and symptoms are assumed to signify a latent disease entity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 3Di subscale scores validly represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.

    “Individual items are summed to generate 12 subscale scores, which represent the 12 individual DSM-IV-TR autistic symptom criteria.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shift from multiple subcategories to a single dimension resulted in improved diagnostic specificity and good diagnostic sensitivity, with over 90% of children with PDDs meeting DSM-5 ASD criteria, and the remainder likely captured by the new social communication disorder diagnosis.

    “Furthermore, the shift from multiple subcategories to a single dimension resulted in improved diagnostic specificity and good diagnostic sensitivity, with over 90% of children with PDDs meeting DSM-5 ASD criteria (Huerta et al. 2012; Mandy et al. 2012), and with the remainder likely captured by the new social communication disorder diagnosis.”

    From The Diagnosis of Autism: From Kanner to DSM-III to DSM-5 and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as Mandy et al. 2012

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although extensive data exist about the presence of each defined RRB in children with autism, the groupings themselves were not empirically derived.

    “Though extensive data exist about the presence of each of the defined RRBs in children with autism (Cuccaro et al. 2003, Honey et al. 2012, Mandy et al. 2012, Szatmari et al. 2006), the groupings themselves were not empirically derived.”

    From Recent Advances in Autism Research as Reflected in DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Mandy et al. 2012

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes empirical studies of autistic symptoms and this paper’s analysis of RRB subscales in children, supporting the existence of data on RRBs. It does not establish that extensive data exist on the presence of each defined RRB. The statement about how the groupings were derived follows the citations and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DSM-IV subtypes have poor predictive ability of later outcome.

    “and poor predictive ability of later outcome based on these subtypes [17,18]”

    From DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes (2013) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Comparison of DSM-5, DSM-IV-TR, and One-Factor Models section reports that the DSM-IV-TR symptom model did not meet criteria for acceptable fit. The Method and Statistical Analyses sections describe diagnostic categories and cross-sectional model testing, but no passage found on DSM-IV subtype diagnoses predicting later outcomes (searched: predictive ability, longitudinal outcome, diagnostic subtypes). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The 3Di citation points to a different publication

    Minor

    The text cites reference 14 for the 3Di, but reference 14 is about diagnostic classification. The 3Di publication appears as reference 13.

  • Sex counts disagree with the subgroup percentages

    Minor

    The reported subgroup sizes and male percentages imply 398 boys in the ASD group and 161 in the BAP group, for 559 altogether, rather than the stated 560.

  • Age categories exclude the oldest reported participant

    Minor

    The oldest participant was 21.1 years old, but the oldest age category ends before age 21. The age-group counts in Table 3 nevertheless total the full sample of 708.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mandy, W. P. L., Charman, T., & Skuse, D. H.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084245469
Cited by
191
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, construct validity, social communication, restricted and repetitive behaviors, sensory disturbances, DSM-IV-TR, factor structure, children and adolescents, autism symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenotype, Severity of Illness Index, Models, Statistical, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review