Cited by 5Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The Perceived Social Context Modulates Rule Learning in Autism

Lu, Haoyang, Li, Pengli, Fang, Jing, Yi, Li·2019·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

This study examines how the awareness of social situation affects rule learning in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using computer-based distrust and deception games. Twenty-eight 4- to 7-year-old children with ASD and 28 age- and IQ-matched typically developing (TD) peers learned the distrusting and deceptive rules in a non-social condition, in which they were playing with a computer, or a social condition with another person pretending to interact via a computer. Results showed intact rule-learning ability in the ASDs in the non-social condition, but poorer overall performance and slower learning process than TD children when they thought that they interacted with a human opponent. Rule learning in ASD was affected by their beliefs about the social context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-019-04174-y

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autistic children did not show a performance gain comparable to non-autistic children when social information relating to a hypothetical person's trustworthiness was offered, but did show a comparable performance gain for helpful non-social information.

    “autistic children did not show a performance gain comparable to non-autistic children when social information relating to the hypothetical person's trustworthiness was offered to them, but did show a comparable performance gain for helpful non-social information [36].”

    From Autistic Cognition: Charting Routes to Anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, H., Li, P., Fang, J., & Yi, L.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yi, Li
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2019-08-24
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
4698-4706
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2969647652
Cited by
5
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571135, 31470974)
  • Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z171100000117015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, rule induction, social environment, distrust, deception, social cognition, children, video games
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Deception, Male, Peer Group, Social Environment, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review