Cited by 209Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyScience Education and Pedagogy

Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms

Warshauer, Hiroko Kawaguchi·2015·Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warshauer, H. K.
Affiliations
Texas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Warshauer, Hiroko Kawaguchi
Venue
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Published
2014-08-14
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
375-400
ISSN
  • 1386-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1820
OpenAlex
W2049550299
Cited by
208
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
productive struggle, junior high school mathematics, proportional reasoning, student struggle, teacher response, cognitive demand, mathematical activity, student thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review