CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher voices from an online elementary mathematics community: examining perceptions of professional learning

Beilstein, Shereen Oca, Henricks, Genevieve M., Jay, Victoria, Perry, Michelle, Bates, Meg Schleppenbach, Moran, Cheryl G., Cimpian, Joseph Robinson·2021·Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
DOI 10.1007/s10857-020-09459-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10857-020-09459-z

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  2. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 71–96. · DOI
  3. Bates, M. S., Phalen, L., & Moran, C. G. (2016a). If you build it, will they reflect? Examining teachers' use of an online video-based learning website. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 17–27. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bates, M. S., Phalen, L., & Moran, C. (2016b). Online professional development: A primer. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(5), 70–73. · DOI
  5. Beilstein, S. O., Perry, M., & Bates, M. S. (2017). Prompting meaningful analysis from pre-service teachers using elementary mathematics video vignettes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 285–295. · DOI
  6. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436. · DOI
  8. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 3–7. · DOI
  9. Brophy, J. (2004). Introduction. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 10. Using video in teacher education (p. ix–xxiv). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  10. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195–207. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520–525. · DOI
  12. Chval, K. B., Lannin, J. K., Arbaugh, F., & Bowzer, A. D. (2009). Videos and prospective teachers. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(2), 98–105. · DOI
  13. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Coles, A. (2013). Using video for professional development: The role of the discussion facilitator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 165–184. · DOI
  15. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Research, 34(3), 3–14. · DOI
  16. De Carvalho Borba, M., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: Overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 697–704. · DOI
  17. Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8–19. · DOI
  18. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Farooq, U., Schank, P., Harris, A., Fusco, J., & Schlager, M. (2007). Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: A case study of designing Tapped In. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16, 397–429. · DOI
  20. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. · DOI
  22. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 5–17.
  24. Hollingsworth, H., & Clarke, D. (2017). Video as a tool for focusing teacher self-reflection: Supporting and provoking teacher learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20, 457–475. · DOI
  25. Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools. Knowledge, 4, 478–510. · DOI
  26. Hur, J. W., & Hara, N. (2007). Factors cultivating sustainable online communities for K-12 teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 245–268. · DOI
  27. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K., Sotelo, F., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analysis of classroom video predicts student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172–181. · DOI
  28. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Thompson, B. J., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 568–589. · DOI
  29. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321–334). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  31. Moon, J., Passmore, C., Reiser, B. J., & Michaels, S. (2014). Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD: Commentary in response to Fishman et al., “Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation”. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 172–176. · DOI
  32. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15. · DOI
  33. Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on pre-service teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 339–349. · DOI
  34. Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 153–165. · DOI
  35. Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 10. Using video in teacher education (pp. 259–286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  36. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37. · DOI
  37. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Shulman, L. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. In Speech delivered at the math science partnerships (MSP) workshop: “Teacher education for effective teaching and learning,” hosted by the National Research Council’s Center for Education, Irvine, California.
  39. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. · DOI
  40. Sun, J., & van Es, E. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers’ classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 201–214. · DOI
  41. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100. · DOI
  42. van Es, E. A. (2010). A framework for facilitating productive discussions in video clubs. Educational Technology, 50(1), 8–12.
  43. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155–176. · DOI
  44. van Es, E. A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 340–356. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Beilstein, S. O., Henricks, G. M., Jay, V., Perry, M., Bates, M. S., Moran, C. G., & Cimpian, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Beilstein, Shereen Oca
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-04-04
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
283-308
ISSN
  • 1386-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1820
DOI
10.1007/s10857-020-09459-z
OpenAlex
W3014808048
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1621253)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
online professional development, primary school mathematics teachers, classroom video, teacher learning, web usage data, teacher commentary, reflective practice, student thinking, online learning communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review