Cited by 88Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesResilience and Mental Health

Main and interactive effects of distress tolerance and negative affect intensity in relation to PTSD symptoms among trauma-exposed adults

Open access
Vujanovic, Anka A., Hart, Ashley S., Potter, Carrie M., Berenz, Erin C., Niles, Barbara, Bernstein, Amit·2013·Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Abstract

The present investigation evaluated the main and interactive effects of distress tolerance and negative affect intensity in relation to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity and symptom cluster severity. Participants were 190 trauma-exposed adults (52.6 % women; Mage=25.3 years, SD=11.4) recruited from the community. Distress tolerance (i.e., perceived ability to withstand distressing emotional states) demonstrated significant incremental associations with global PTSD symptom severity as well as Re-Experiencing, Emotional Numbing, and Hyperarousal symptom cluster severity. Negative affect intensity (i.e., perceived intensity of negative emotional responses) demonstrated significant incremental associations with each of the PTSD symptom outcomes. Moreover, the incremental interactive effect of distress tolerance and negative affect intensity was significantly associated with PTSD symptom severity as well as PTSD-Emotional Numbing symptom cluster severity. These incremental effects were evident after accounting for the variance explained by anxiety sensitivity (i.e., fear of anxiety-related sensations). Post hoc probing analyses supported the moderating role of negative affect intensity in the association between distress tolerance and PTSD symptom severity, such that low levels of distress tolerance, in the context of elevated levels of negative affect intensity, were associated with the greatest levels of PTSD symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10862-012-9325-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M Spitzer R Williams J Gibbon M Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-Non-patient edition (SCID-NP, version 1.0) 1995 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vujanovic, A. A., Hart, A. S., Potter, C. M., Berenz, E. C., Niles, B., & Bernstein, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Vujanovic, Anka A.
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2012-10-13
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
235-243
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 0882-2689
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W2024606333
Cited by
88
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Psychology Beyond Borders
  • European Commission
  • Rothschild Caesarea Foundation
  • Council for Higher Education
  • University of Haifa
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31mh073205-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH073205, F31MH080453)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA021006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
distress tolerance, post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD symptom severity, symptom clusters, re-experiencing, emotional numbing, hyperarousal, anxiety sensitivity, trauma exposure, moderating effect, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review