Cited by 28Behavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Efficacy of habit-based weight loss interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Cleo, Gina, Beller, Elaine, Glasziou, Paul, Isenring, Elisabeth, Thomas, Rae·2020·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Habit-based interventions are a novel and emerging strategy to help reduce excess weight in individuals with overweight or obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of habit-based interventions on weight loss. We identified potential studies through electronic searches in February 2019. Included studies were randomized/quasi randomized controlled trials comparing weight loss interventions founded on habit-theory with a control (active or non-active) and enrolled adults with overweight or obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m 2). Five trials (630 participants) met our inclusion criteria. After the intervention period (range 8-14 weeks), weight loss was modest but statistically different between groups (1.4 kg [95% confidence interval 0.5, 2.3; P = 0.004]) favoring habit-based interventions. Intervention groups averaged 2.5 kg weight loss (range 1.7 to 6.7 kg) compared with control 1.5 kg (range 0.4 to 5.8 kg) and were 2.4 times more likely to achieve clinically beneficial weight loss (≥ 5% weight reduction). Average weight losses in adults with overweight and obesity using habit-based interventions appear to be of clinical benefit. There were statistically significant differences in weight loss between habit-based interventions and controls, post-intervention. Longer studies powered to examine at least 12-month follow-up are required to more accurately determine the role of habit-based interventions on long-term weight loss maintenance.Trial registration Prospero ID: CRD42017065589. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42017065589 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-019-00100-w

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program]. The Cochrane Collaboration: Copenhagen 2014.
  2. Roqué i Figuls M, Martinex Gracia L, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Pacheco R, Mauricio D, Bonfill CX. Interventions for treating overweight or obesity in adults: an overview of systematic review (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleo, G., Beller, E., Glasziou, P., Isenring, E., & Thomas, R.
Affiliations
Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cleo, Gina
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2019-09-16
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
519-532
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2974028257
Cited by
28
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1104136, APP1044904, GNT1080042)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight loss, obesity, overweight, habit theory, behavioral weight management, weight loss maintenance
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Obesity, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review